Actually this doesnt adress the argument at all. His argument is that Herrera would 'easily' get into the PSG midfield, and that it's not 'even debatable'. PSG's midfielders - Krychowiak, Verratti, Motta, Matuidi, and Rabiot, possibly ADM, whilst Draxler and Pastore could take up the attacking midfield roles if they play a two-man midfield. It is very much debatable that Herrera would walk into a midfield consisting of these players, all of whom have actually achieved a lot more than Herrera, whilst being younger than him. In the context of this thread, my ideal midfield (which I've posted before), is:
Fabinho--Verratti
---Pogba
with Verratti replacing Herrera. Verratti's a muppet signing in these boards, and for me it's not even in question that he's a better player than Herrera.
The comparison is disingenuous, why did you pick Herrera's best season, and compare to those 3 players' worst seasons (i.e. this season)? Let's make the comparison a little fairer:
http://www.squawka.com/comparison-m..._bad_tackles/yellow_cards/pass_completion#avg
(I dont know how to embed the image, if someone could tell me, that would be great).
This shows some of those respective players stronger seasons. I've also added in Modric, who has just won La Liga with Real and got the CL final (and won it last year) - I suppose Herrera's clearly superior to him, since Squawka gives him a higher Total Score? I know who I'd rather have, and goes to show how misleading these stats are. The comparator looks a lot more equal if you are fair to the other players, and once again proves my point that it is very much debatable that Herrera would get into the PSG team. It's not some feat of achievement to get into Utd's midfield atm, Fellaini starts for us. When there's greater competition, it's not so easy to judge.