elmo
Can never have too many Eevees
raining here in Singapore. Hopefully it’ll be wet for qualifying later.
yes 60% chanceIs it forecast rain for tomorrow?
yes 60% chance
yeah but that’s about 107% in red bull parlance.
I admire your determination to find fault and blame with everyone but Red Bull for Red Bull allegedly breaking the rulesProbably wasn’t a good idea for the FIA to hire Toto’s personal lawyer. Their integrity is going to come massively under the spotlight whether the claims are right or not.
totally disagree, if any team is found to be breeching the budget cap rules, then absolutely they should be punished to the fullest.I don’t think that retrospective point penalties would be good for the sport. I know that it probably makes sense to do that from a competitive point of view but it would be a foolish decision for f1 to change results now all these months down the line
If their recent policy is anything to go by, they'll let it slide for RB and then change the rules for future incidents
I admire your determination to find fault and blame with everyone but Red Bull for Red Bull allegedly breaking the rules
I read his post but don't bite.Hobbers is Helmut in disguise.
Must be Porsche after the deal fell apart.Horner is not happy and has every right to be, somebody has leaked the claims.
https://www.skysports.com/f1/live-b...on-drivers-title?postid=4562394#liveblog-body
Must be Porsche after the deal fell apart.
I would go with this, leaked to one or 2, who the leaker knew would spread it around.it feels like an internal fia leak to me.
If horner ever left RedBull, flavio briatorrie would be the perfect replacement as team prinicpal for RedBull, they are so alike.Horner is not happy and has every right to be, somebody has leaked the claims.
https://www.skysports.com/f1/live-b...on-drivers-title?postid=4562394#liveblog-body
totally disagree, if any team is found to be breeching the budget cap rules, then absolutely they should be punished to the fullest.
Not doing anything would be stupid, it would just mean the rest could do and say, well you never did anything to that team, why us.
Breaking the budget caps is cheating, pure and simple.
Have to agree with @pauldy on this. People have been made redundant, there has been massive restructing off the track within the f1 teams to stay within the financial restrictions. A £5mil spend is equivalent to a seasons worth of inhouse developement on your race car. The book needs to be thrown at RB and AM if they are found guilty. Otherwise we will have ffp equivalent of financial doping ala man city and psg.For example McLaren and Renault more or less got away with murder (and in Renault’s case almost literally), so it’s all nothing new. If RB are found guilty then the most likely outcome will be a similar penalty as with McLaren in their spygate scandal. I think the problem is more that F1 doesn’t clearly set out the punishment if certain rules are broken and everything gets twisted by lawyers, it all becomes very complicated by the way the rules are set & written.
RB tempering with evidence most likelySo I signed up to the F1 fantasy using facebook, and trying to log in now, and I get this error:
This app is not accessible right now and the app developer is aware of the issue. You will be able to log in when the app is reactivated.
Tried on my phone as well
RB tempering with evidence most likely
Lewis has been to the stewards, about his nose ring.
Its a stupid rule, but rules are rule.
probably just asking him how he’d like to be presented with last year’s title.
Yeah, feck Lee Way! Hate that guy.why is there a 5% leeway on penalties.
5% of 145m is 7.25m, thats massive and is a hell of a lot of extra development.
There should not NO leeway.
totally disagree, if any team is found to be breeching the budget cap rules, then absolutely they should be punished to the fullest.
Not doing anything would be stupid, it would just mean the rest could do and say, well you never did anything to that team, why us.
Breaking the budget caps is cheating, pure and simple.
Yeah, feck Lee Way! Hate that guy.
UEFA did it to Marseille when they cheated to win. They lost all their titles. The Olympics strip medals after the fact if someone is found to have cheated. It's the right thing to do. I don't think the FIA will do it because they are a joke.I don’t think that retrospective point penalties would be good for the sport. I know that it probably makes sense to do that from a competitive point of view but it would be a foolish decision for f1 to change results now all these months down the line
I think they absolutely must do it , if any team is found guilty.I love Lewis and would love a retrospective penalty but I feel that f1 just can’t do it because of what it would do to the image of the sport after the crazy title race last year. I wouldn’t blame them either because in the end it’s a business as well which needs to protect its interests. I think a future penalty with the message that any team found guilty after this could get retrospective penalties will be the most likely outcome.
Yeah, feck Lee Way! Hate that guy.
A far more apt comparison would be Juventus following Calciopoli, where the players (who did nothing wrong) didn’t lose out on their individual records however the team were reprimanded.UEFA did it to Marseille when they cheated to win. They lost all their titles. The Olympics strip medals after the fact if someone is found to have cheated. It's the right thing to do. I don't think the FIA will do it because they are a joke.
That is not something I am doing, I dont think it would be right, but cheating is cheating.A far more apt comparison would be Juventus following Calciopoli, where the players (who did nothing wrong) didn’t lose out on their individual records however the team were reprimanded.
The Olympics comparison doesn’t hold up in any sense, in that every event that I can think of it would have to be a competitor cheating rather than their boss. Desperately trying to cling onto some way where Lewis wins the world title is pretty daft, it’s not like Max is the Red Bull accountant