It makes sense to talk about it still considering the meeting was this week. Would be odd if there was no discussion about it.
It makes sense to talk about it still considering the meeting was this week. Would be odd if there was no discussion about it.
Honestly, when the sample F1 car came out years ago the general consensus was that the constraints were such that all the cars were going to be badass, and they are.Where is that post from a few weeks back saying these cars are going to be ugly? Best they've been in years.
It's as if everytime Calciopoli is mentioned in the football forum all the Italian posters show up en masse and tell everyone to shut up about it because it wasn't this season.
It's such odd behaviour.
Yeah, the engineering part is really important. That and the driver mutually reinforce each other though: a mediocre driver doesn't just stunble into the best car and win everything. The best teams have the the most money to build the best car, can contract the best driver (they're all the global top, but the best have just that bit more consistency, driving skills, and understanding of the car), who can then win - and you're back at the top with the money (which is also dependent on sponsors of course). That's why Mercedes managed to dominate for so long, and it took Red Bull an exceptional talent (Verstappen), a change in regulations, and a good bit of luck (that final race especially) to unseat them last year - and why this year is particularly interesting.Bit of a noob question perhaps, but I was talking to one of my F1 enthousiast mates about the typical tiresome question, why don't they all have the same car and he said he sees F1 as an engineering championship first and a racing championship 2nd. Do people agree with that? And do you support a team first and the drivers second (like in football)? Or is it driver first and team second?
I actually don't really support any team in particular, but I would think supporting a driver is more fun than a team?
Yep. It would be a weird F1 fan who doesn't want to discuss the major events of this week.Pretty much this. Its classic diversion tactics from the same lot.
The report on Abu Dhabi literally came out this week, which as a result has shaken up the management of races, resulted in the race director losing his job, made changes to rules as a direct consequence to the abu dhabi incident..
So the weird thing would be if nobody was discussing it.
The best drivers also give the best feedback and actually contribute more to technical development of the car with their engineers.Yeah, the engineering part is really important. That and the driver mutually reinforce each other though: a mediocre driver doesn't just stunble into the best car and win everything. The best teams have the the most money to build the best car, can contract the best driver (they're all the global top, but the best have just that bit more consistency, driving skills, and understanding of the car), who can then win - and you're back at the top with the money (which is also dependent on sponsors of course). That's why Mercedes managed to dominate for so long, and it took Red Bull an exceptional talent (Verstappen), a change in regulations, and a good bit of luck (that final race especially) to unseat them last year - and why this year is particularly interesting.
Good job max doesn't drive for them .. he'd kill somebody in the first cornerThat Ferrari does look nice. The nose is so sharp it could stab someone!
No, that would be the case if the rear end was sharp.Good job max doesn't drive for them .. he'd kill somebody in the first corner
Interesting that Ferrari are the only ones who have gone for the fat inlets and using the body as the air guide.
Either they've made an innovation nobody else thought of, or they've gone the wrong way.
This is what's so great about f1 isn't it. Exciting, not knowing who's going to be hitting the ground from the start etc.
See, I would be even more interested if they reverse this and put Max and Lewis in Haas and Mazepin and Schumacher in a Merc.Yeah, the engineering part is really important. That and the driver mutually reinforce each other though: a mediocre driver doesn't just stunble into the best car and win everything. The best teams have the the most money to build the best car, can contract the best driver (they're all the global top, but the best have just that bit more consistency, driving skills, and understanding of the car), who can then win - and you're back at the top with the money (which is also dependent on sponsors of course). That's why Mercedes managed to dominate for so long, and it took Red Bull an exceptional talent (Verstappen), a change in regulations, and a good bit of luck (that final race especially) to unseat them last year - and why this year is particularly interesting.
Yeah I suspect they've gone old school but not sure it will work. Looks like an 80s beaut though and the rear wing looks sexy.
The Williams pods looked good to me but I have a feeling that the Merc front wing (beautiful btw!) and funky floorboard there is going to do something mad and get double the downforce or something.
Will be an interesting season like you say.
definitely, the ferrari is absolutely gorgeous. the sidepods are certainly unique.Yeah I suspect they've gone old school but not sure it will work. Looks like an 80s beaut though and the rear wing looks sexy.
The Williams pods looked good to me but I have a feeling that the Merc front wing (beautiful btw!) and funky floorboard there is going to do something mad and get double the downforce or something.
Will be an interesting season like you say.
Sorry, yes, that was what I was trying to get at with 'understanding of the car'; but I phrased it poorly.The best drivers also give the best feedback and actually contribute more to technical development of the car with their engineers.
To some extent, me too! But that's not how any sport works of course. I mean, top clubs in football also tend to have the best backroom staff (except United, it seems ).See, I would be even more interested if they reverse this and put Max and Lewis in Haas and Mazepin and Schumacher in a Merc.
Pauly, OK to start a 2024 thread?
His son.Who is Michael?
Pauly, OK to start a 2024 thread?
Wonder if Audi or Porsche would supply the engines to a andretti team. Alledgly RedBull/Porsche tie up is close and Audi still want Mclaren.
I might have missed something, but wouldn't Audi & Porsche mean VW investing twice in F1? I'm not sure why they'd want to do that.
To increase sales of cars under both brands.
The cost is prohibitive enough for most manufacturers with one brand though. It has to make commercial sense so we'll see, but I'm extremely doubtful unless they do something where the engines are shared but two brands,
Well this is their point about condition of entry in 2026, in that the changes to the engine specification makes it much more accessible commercially for them to enter multiple brands. Either as an engine supplier or as a works team.
Audi is the dead cert, Porsche will be on a prestige vote internally. Both have motorsport heritage, and the efuel movement is a strategical goal for Porsche. A similar strategy mooted by F1 in the future. Plus also the fact that the Porsche family have the majority vote share in the VW group means it’s likely we’ll see them feature over the VW brand.
The best drivers also give the best feedback and actually contribute more to technical development of the car with their engineers.
I personally think it's still super important that a driver have the ability to give feedback and help the engineering team as at the end of the day the driver is the one that knows where the balance needs to be to go around the track the fastest. I think Vetell has given Aston Martin an eye opener, I also think Williams will miss George Russell and his input.
Do you reckon it's important as it used to be? With all the sensors on the cars, I'd be surprised if a driver can tell the engineering team much they aren't already aware of from the data.