I have no idea what that means.
F1 2022 Season
- Thread starter pauldyson1uk
- Start date
I have no idea what that means.
I think hamilton was one lap away from retirement last year. I think he would have retired if not for michael masi.
Mercedes will fix the car at some point this season. If they can get it into the ferrari window of some porposing but still being extremely quick then I'd think they'd accept that.
Maybe a controversial view, but i think the cost cap ceiling should be lifted for only those teams with porposing. As the season goes on RB will get further away from ferrari as ferrari need to try to fix their porposing while developing the car to compete with RB. They cant do both for long. We really need Ferrari to challenge RB to keep the season from becoming a snore fest.
the car runs in a pocket of triple air. it’s richer in oxygen and carries more gravity than normal air, allowing for faster times and more downforce.
Jesus people give Lewis way too much leeway here. He got more great cars than anyone even the best drivers is ever likely to get.
Merc giving him one third place car ain't that big a deal.
Also got to laugh at your mans Red Bull conspiracy. If that was a thing Merc and Ferrari would be shouting it from the rooftops.
Fact is Red Bull and Ferrari just built better cars. Same as Merc where doing for years.
Merc giving him one third place car ain't that big a deal.
Also got to laugh at your mans Red Bull conspiracy. If that was a thing Merc and Ferrari would be shouting it from the rooftops.
Fact is Red Bull and Ferrari just built better cars. Same as Merc where doing for years.
BBC on next season:
"...For next season, the FIA told teams in the directive, which is not publicly available but which has been seen by BBC Sport: "The objective is to implement changes for 2023 which will inherently reduce the propensity of the cars to exhibit aerodynamic oscillations."
As part of this, they will assess technical changes, including "raising the floor edges, reduction of the floor planform, [elimination] of floor edge wing etc"....
"...For next season, the FIA told teams in the directive, which is not publicly available but which has been seen by BBC Sport: "The objective is to implement changes for 2023 which will inherently reduce the propensity of the cars to exhibit aerodynamic oscillations."
As part of this, they will assess technical changes, including "raising the floor edges, reduction of the floor planform, [elimination] of floor edge wing etc"....
Pretty sure rimaldo has just made this up as a laugh. As it makes absolutely no sense at all.
Haha good one.
Found Toto's caf account.
Hopefully any "Solution" they bring next season allows teams who build a better car to keep the pace they earned through their better car concept.
Now I know this is a windup.
You mean looking at the poster wasn't enough
?tbf he knows about rims.You mean looking at the poster wasn't enough
That would be ridiculously unfair. It's up to Mercedes etc to catch up on porpoising issues at the detriment of other advances. That's F1. If RBR are light years ahead then regs will likely change to level the playing field. It's just a matter of when.
Horner's position on ride height change across all teams being unfair but raising the spending cap for all teams is essential because food prices have increased was... creative
Who's giving him leeway? He's 37 in a young mans sport, the point is does he need to keep racing in F1 if it's not at the front, he's got nothing left to prove. Schumacher's come back was largely pointless, Alonso hasn't achieved anything since end of 2014, Raikkonen arguably raced a bit longer than he should.
Hamilton could go try something else and enjoy himself for a few more years, the guy is miserable if he's not in race winning machinery, Merc would do well to turn this around for 2023 at this rate.
One could strongly argue that he was a big foundation to the success Mercedes has seen for the past 8 seasons or so.
Yes I have no doubt but for Schumacher himself the achievements weren't there.
I think he played a huge part. Whilst we don't know what goes on behind the scenes 100% he's shown that he excels in helping build a team. He essentially did the same for Ferrari back in the late 90s which led to their all conquering early 00's
Monaco pole was probably the highlight I would say in that stint, and the podium in Valencia.
That would be ridiculously unfair. It's up to Mercedes etc to catch up on porpoising issues at the detriment of other advances. That's F1. If RBR are light years ahead then regs will likely change to level the playing field. It's just a matter of when.
Horner's position on ride height change across all teams being unfair but raising the spending cap for all teams is essential because food prices have increased was... creative
Glad that someone finally called him up on it.
Did he say food prices or inflation in general?That would be ridiculously unfair. It's up to Mercedes etc to catch up on porpoising issues at the detriment of other advances. That's F1. If RBR are light years ahead then regs will likely change to level the playing field. It's just a matter of when.
Horner's position on ride height change across all teams being unfair but raising the spending cap for all teams is essential because food prices have increased was... creative
RB, Ferrari and Mclaren upset with Mercedes second stays in FP1.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/rivals-question-mercedes-speedy-reaction-second-stay/
https://www.planetf1.com/news/rivals-question-mercedes-speedy-reaction-second-stay/
FFS moaning about a stay, that did not even work.
Are they implying Mercedes had insider knowledge of the directive.
He said inflation in general. Which he has a point that the cost cap probably should have been much more thought out to consider potential massive changes in the financial world.
The cost of transportation is supposed to have gone up by like 20+% in some cases.
He also made a good point that if this cost cap fails miserably there might never be another.
Both side of the argument does have some merit. I think it wasn't planned well at all but I am someone who hates rules changing mid season so that goes against changing the cost cap for me.
The issue is the punishments don't seem to be set either. So the teams don't even know what happens if they go over etc etc.
F1 needs to review it all and make a definitive plan by the mid season break. One way or another the teams need to know where they stand.
Also it's funny that only people always start to blame Red Bull for these thing. Supposedly there is atleast 50% support for cost cap to be reviewed.
Or like with the weight change earlier in the season. 9 teams wanted it but Red Bull got all the flack for it. That was a change I also disagreed with as Alfa earned their advantage being a he only team at the minimum.
Either way wether you think the cost cap should change or not it's certainly a discussion that needs to be had. Punishments for going over by X amounts should also have been very clear from before the start of season.
F1 is a fecking great sport but it is very poorly planned in a lot of ways. The rules are a mess for instance.
He mentioned costs of living, costs of parts, costs of putting fuel in your car, costs of freight, cost of electrics and costs of utilities.
From Jon Noble on twitter:
Mercedes has chosen to remove the second floor stay on its Formula 1 car, amid questions from rivals at the Canadian Grand Prix about whether or not the addition could be proteste d.
Mercedes has chosen to remove the second floor stay on its Formula 1 car, amid questions from rivals at the Canadian Grand Prix about whether or not the addition could be proteste d.
Leclerc to start at back of grid!
Ferrari have just confirmed that Charles Leclerc has taken a completely new power unit, and will therefore start from the back of the grid in Sunday's race.
There had been a lot of speculation that Ferrari would take this decision, at a track that provides plenty of overtaking opportunities.
It's not great news for Leclerc's world championship hopes, but it promises to add a thrilling layer to Sunday's race for the fans!
Ferrari have just confirmed that Charles Leclerc has taken a completely new power unit, and will therefore start from the back of the grid in Sunday's race.
There had been a lot of speculation that Ferrari would take this decision, at a track that provides plenty of overtaking opportunities.
It's not great news for Leclerc's world championship hopes, but it promises to add a thrilling layer to Sunday's race for the fans!
Damn need to change my fantasy predictions.
From what they were saying earlier sounds like Mick Schumacher has been given a warning to sort it out...
Have we traveled back in time to 2012.
Will be an interesting qualifying, that rain doesn't seem to be going anywhere.
Inters were doing well towards the end of FP3 but could be back to full wets by qualifying
Inters were doing well towards the end of FP3 but could be back to full wets by qualifying
They've really made an arse of the new regulations. Ungainly, blunt and heavy cars. Massively compromised in concept, and even the most refined version of the cars in a few years will still be just a well polished turd.
And the racing is no closer and overtaking is still all DRS. What was the point in all that?!
And the racing is no closer and overtaking is still all DRS. What was the point in all that?!
Canadian GP Free Practise 3 Time Sheet
A wet qualifying could really shake up the grid.
I don't see Leclerc really trying hard, he is back of the grid no matter what, he will save his tyres for the race.
Pity Lewis is in such a shit car in the wet he is brillant.
Think the wet still plays to Max's strengths he is good in the wet.
I don't see Leclerc really trying hard, he is back of the grid no matter what, he will save his tyres for the race.
Pity Lewis is in such a shit car in the wet he is brillant.
Think the wet still plays to Max's strengths he is good in the wet.
and the dry.
OK and in the dry.
I am not a fan of his, but I do think he is an excellent driver, is he the best on the grid this season, yes I think he is.
I might be wrong, but a very wet race and qually could be good for Mercedes. Everyone will have to raise the ride height of their cars to counteract any aquaplaning.
Its a guess on my part.
Maybe good for Russell, sadly don't see Lewis doing anything, but never say never.
if perez out qualifies max it’ll be three race weekends in a row. time for red bull to relegate max to the number 2 driver?
Yeah Hamilton doesn't have confidence in this car so in wet conditions I think he will actually be even further behind Russell than normal. No matter how good you are in the wet, if you don't trust the car you don't have much chance
I have been saying that, he has no confidence in the car and wont push it.