elmo
Can never have too many Eevees
I hope the Red Bull breaks down every race that Max is there. Never met a more self righteous hypocritical cnut of a duo than Horner and his ego.
I hope the Red Bull breaks down every race that Max is there. Never met a more self righteous hypocritical cnut of a duo than Horner and his ego.
This is very clever by Ferrari.
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/...-verstappen-move-goes-unpunished/6795327/amp/
I hope the Red Bull breaks down every race that Max is there. Never met a more self righteous hypocritical cnut of a duo than Horner and his ego.
Each and every team and their drivers should be entitled to do exactly as Max has done. And that spells danger and so the FIA really do have to stop sitting on their hands and take back control.
Yeah, there was a good post by @telstar96 on that on the previous page.Each and every team and their drivers should be entitled to do exactly as Max has done. And that spells danger and so the FIA really do have to stop sitting on their hands and take back control.
For me, since Max gained an advantage by going off track, the FIA should've asked him to hand over the position to Lewis. Since they decided to do nothing, it's tricky to come back and penalise Max retrospectively. How do you assess what is a fair penalty? A grid pen? Retrospective 5 seconds? Even, if you think Max deserves a penalty, the fact that the FIA didn't intervene has major repercussions.
After Lewis passed Max, the latter cruised to the finish, with his gap to Bottas going from 10 to 3 seconds. Obviously a penalty would impact the result, but then is it fair and in the spirit of the sport to penalise someone so late after the fact, especially when certain decisions were made (like Max cruising to the finish) based on the fact the FIA said there would be no action. Furthermore, now you have drivers like Leclerc, who've come out and said they would race differently, based on how the FIA judged the Brazilian GP. This is bad precedent the FIA have set, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see some outrageous driving towards the backend of the season.
Personally, I would rather the FIA move on from this situation with no penalty, but add more clarification to the sporting regulations. A lot of the decisions are at the discretion of stewards, which just allows for too many subjective takes. I'm convinced they allow for more leniency with drivers that are competing for the win, as opposed to those in the midfield. Tsunoda's penalty at the Brazilian GP is probably the best example of this.
Good postFor me, since Max gained an advantage by going off track, the FIA should've asked him to hand over the position to Lewis. Since they decided to do nothing, it's tricky to come back and penalise Max retrospectively. How do you assess what is a fair penalty? A grid pen? Retrospective 5 seconds? Even, if you think Max deserves a penalty, the fact that the FIA didn't intervene has major repercussions.
After Lewis passed Max, the latter cruised to the finish, with his gap to Bottas going from 10 to 3 seconds. Obviously a penalty would impact the result, but then is it fair and in the spirit of the sport to penalise someone so late after the fact, especially when certain decisions were made (like Max cruising to the finish) based on the fact the FIA said there would be no action. Furthermore, now you have drivers like Leclerc, who've come out and said they would race differently, based on how the FIA judged the Brazilian GP. This is bad precedent the FIA have set, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see some outrageous driving towards the backend of the season.
Personally, I would rather the FIA move on from this situation with no penalty, but add more clarification to the sporting regulations. A lot of the decisions are at the discretion of stewards, which just allows for too many subjective takes. I'm convinced they allow for more leniency with drivers that are competing for the win, as opposed to those in the midfield. Tsunoda's penalty at the Brazilian GP is probably the best example of this.
Agree with the others, good post. I do however disagree with Max cruising. It's a race at the end of the day and if they did go back for a 5-second penalty it's his own damn fault for not racing. My perspective anyhowFor me, since Max gained an advantage by going off track, the FIA should've asked him to hand over the position to Lewis. Since they decided to do nothing, it's tricky to come back and penalise Max retrospectively. How do you assess what is a fair penalty? A grid pen? Retrospective 5 seconds? Even, if you think Max deserves a penalty, the fact that the FIA didn't intervene has major repercussions.
After Lewis passed Max, the latter cruised to the finish, with his gap to Bottas going from 10 to 3 seconds. Obviously a penalty would impact the result, but then is it fair and in the spirit of the sport to penalise someone so late after the fact, especially when certain decisions were made (like Max cruising to the finish) based on the fact the FIA said there would be no action. Furthermore, now you have drivers like Leclerc, who've come out and said they would race differently, based on how the FIA judged the Brazilian GP. This is bad precedent the FIA have set, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see some outrageous driving towards the backend of the season.
Personally, I would rather the FIA move on from this situation with no penalty, but add more clarification to the sporting regulations. A lot of the decisions are at the discretion of stewards, which just allows for too many subjective takes. I'm convinced they allow for more leniency with drivers that are competing for the win, as opposed to those in the midfield. Tsunoda's penalty at the Brazilian GP is probably the best example of this.
do I detect some rear wing flex there...
I believe it was a problem they had during FP2. They worked on it during the session and fixed it I thinkStrange. Although I can’t see how that is aerodynamically efficient.
I wouldn't mind a new champ. But Red Bull and Max are insufferable. Horrible entitled pricks the lot of them.It’s annoying that F1 needs a new champ to break up the Hamilton dominance and it’s going to be these smeglords.
I expect toto wolf is looking for duct tapeI believe it was a problem they had during FP2. They worked on it during the session and fixed it I think
The FIA seems to have already chosen their champion.It already feels inevitable that Merc will punished for whatever RB moan about
Errrrm.Each and every team and their drivers should be entitled to do exactly as Max has done. And that spells danger and so the FIA really do have to stop sitting on their hands and take back control.
I already made a funny (in my mind) joke although no one gave me creditErrrrm.
Take back control of our borders (track limits)
Driver | Team | Time |
---|---|---|
1) Max Verstappen | Red Bull | 1:23.723 |
2) Pierre Gasly | AlphaTauri | +0.437 |
3) Valtteri Bottas | Mercedes | +0.471 |
4) Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | +0.786 |
5) Yuki Tsunoda | AlphaTauri | +0.925 |
6) Carlos Sainz | Ferrari | +0.990 |
7) Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | +1.067 |
8) Sergio Perez | Red Bull | +1.192 |
9) Esteban Ocon | Alpine | +1.249 |
10) Lando Norris | McLaren | +1.492 |
11) Daniel Ricciardo | McLaren | +1.568 |
12) Sebastian Vettel | Aston Martin | +1.605 |
13) Nicholas Latifi | Williams | +1.965 |
14) Antonio Giovinazzi | Alfa Romeo | +2.034 |
15) Kimi Raikkonen | Alfa Romeo | +2.105 |
16) George Russell | Williams | +2.148 |
17) Fernando Alonso | Alpine | +2.182 |
18) Mick Schumacher | Haas | +2.976 |
19) Lance Stroll | Aston Martin | +2.989 |
20) Nikita Mazepin | Haas | +3.777 |
Driver | Team | Time |
---|---|---|
1) Valtteri Bottas | Mercedes | 1:23.148 |
2) Pierre Gasly | AlphaTauri | +0.209 |
3) Max Verstappen | Red Bull | +0.350 |
4) Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | +0.422 |
5) Lando Norris | McLaren | +0.484 |
6) Lance Stroll | Aston Martin | +0.557 |
7) Yuki Tsunoda | AlphaTauri | +0.587 |
8) Sergio Perez | Red Bull | +0.639 |
9) Sebastian Vettel | Aston Martin | +0.872 |
10) Carlos Sainz | Ferrari | +0.885 |
11) Esteban Ocon | Alpine | +0.893 |
12) Fernando Alonso | Alpine | +0.908 |
13) Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | +0.947 |
14) Daniel Ricciardo | McLaren | +0.987 |
15) Kimi Raikkonen | Alfa Romeo | +1.483 |
16) George Russell | Williams | +1.806 |
17) Antonio Giovinazzi | Alfa Romeo | +1.924 |
18) Nicholas Latifi | Williams | +2.061 |
19) Mick Schumacher | Haas | +2.427 |
20) Nikita Mazepin | Haas | No time set |
You did well.I already made a funny (in my mind) joke although no one gave me credit
Where has this performance from Gasly come from lately?
Either the car has stepped up massively or he's riding some mega form. He's looked mega in the last 3/4 races.
I believe Horner is a terrible man manager unless you are his number one. Toxic environment for any young, up and coming driver.He is and has always been an incredibly talented driver. That’s why he got his promotion into the RB seat when he did.
However unfortunately he didn’t appear to be able to handle the higher pressure that comes with being in a top team. Perhaps he didn’t receive a long enough chance. Perhaps that environment is genuinely not meant for him. But regardless when he is relaxed he’s really very good.
Mate I’ve long gotten past the stage of listening to anything he says. I pay no attention to him and my life is better for it.what I find daft is that Horner really thinks the Merc wing is illegal, there is no way any team would drive with such a wing, with intention of cheating, there is far too much scrutiny.
I am not saying that Mercedes have not found a way to change things within the rules, maybe bending them, have RB not done the same in the past ?
But out and out cheating and that is what he is hinting at, then no I cant believe that.
He has always been a good driver, maybe his time at Red Bull came a tad to soon.Where has this performance from Gasly come from lately?
Either the car has stepped up massively or he's riding some mega form. He's looked mega in the last 3/4 races.
I hear you, he is just annoying the hell out of me.Mate I’ve long gotten past the stage of listening to anything he says. I pay no attention to him and my life is better for it.
It will be difficult for the FIA to punish a driver blocking anyone on the outside for the rest of the season now.
This may go against Red Bull if the Mercedes engine / drag advantage is enough to overtake in DRS zones. The car in front can do what they want to cover the outside while taking the inside line, so the only way to overtake is get in front on the straights.
His red bull car was a dog iircHe is and has always been an incredibly talented driver. That’s why he got his promotion into the RB seat when he did.
However unfortunately he didn’t appear to be able to handle the higher pressure that comes with being in a top team. Perhaps he didn’t receive a long enough chance. Perhaps that environment is genuinely not meant for him. But regardless when he is relaxed he’s really very good.
To be honest does anyone really expect them not to punish the next person who does exactly what Max does?It will be difficult for the FIA to punish a driver blocking anyone on the outside for the rest of the season now.
This may go against Red Bull if the Mercedes engine / drag advantage is enough to overtake in DRS zones. The car in front can do what they want to cover the outside while taking the inside line, so the only way to overtake is get in front on the straights.
There's probably a desire for max to become the champion from within the FIA. Hes young, will probably attract a new audience etc etc.To be honest does anyone really expect them not to punish the next person who does exactly what Max does?
It's not Max's action that was legal, it was Max who's nonpunishable for TV ratings.
They've to manage that engine to last for the last 3 race. Too much of a gamble to risk changing to a new one and getting hit with a grid penalty unless they know they'll be so dominant in a track like how Mercedes was at Sau Paolo.Agree with the others, good post. I do however disagree with Max cruising. It's a race at the end of the day and if they did go back for a 5-second penalty it's his own damn fault for not racing. My perspective anyhow
It has nothing to do with TV ratings, it's been clear for a few years now that Max is being treated with a separate rulebook from the rest.To be honest does anyone really expect them not to punish the next person who does exactly what Max does?
It's not Max's action that was legal, it was Max who's nonpunishable for TV ratings.
There's probably a desire for max to become the champion from within the FIA. Hes young, will probably attract a new audience etc etc.
Theres also probably a desire from somewhere in FIA not to have lewis win more WDC that schmacher.
It is strange given the intense scrutiny the whole issue has had with everyone from the global media to armchair fans searching every frame from every camera angle available.what I find daft is that Horner really thinks the Merc wing is illegal, there is no way any team would drive with such a wing, with intention of cheating, there is far too much scrutiny.
I am not saying that Mercedes have not found a way to change things within the rules, maybe bending them, have RB not done the same in the past ?
But out and out cheating and that is what he is hinting at, then no I cant believe that.
Appears they still haven't been able to fix it. Weird problem to have, a wing flapping like that can only cost timeI believe it was a problem they had during FP2. They worked on it during the session and fixed it I think