Redlambs
Creator of the Caftards comics
Ouch, some users earlier in the thread have some humble pie to eat on this one.
It won't happen.
Just remember those posters for what they are and move on
Ouch, some users earlier in the thread have some humble pie to eat on this one.
Vettel just decided to accelerate. His mistake since it is up to the car behind to not rearend someone. The sideswipe looked pretty deliberate to me. I wonder if there is an on board view?
I literally cannot believe anyone is seriously trying to defend Vettel here.
That's the worst bit of it. It's not the first time he's flown off the handle - Mexico's radio rant comes to mind. Most drivers manage to keep some kind of control when things have gone south for them, but clearly Mr Finger has a problem there.
No, one deliberately drove his car into an opponent.Hamilton mightn't have used brakes but he almost stopped after the turn, which could cause problems for someone, who's following him and expecting to naturally speed up a little at that point. Kind of understand Vettel was annoyed but should've just waved his hand and get on with it, the moron.
Both are major cnuts in my eyes. One as bad as the other.
And the other deliberately slowed in a position where he knew it would likely cause an incident. They were both at fault.No, one deliberately drove his car into an opponent.
Hamilton is like Mayweather of F1, such a cnut of a racer, he knew exactly what he was doing i.e. slowing down deliberately after the corner. Vettel is an idiot and was bang out of order by hitting Hamilton sideways. Both should have gotten penalties.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/40400301Hamilton mightn't have used brakes but he almost stopped after the turn, which could cause problems for someone, who's following him and expecting to naturally speed up a little at that point. Kind of understand Vettel was annoyed but should've just waved his hand and get on with it, the moron.
Both are major cnuts in my eyes. One as bad as the other.
See post above. If you repeat alternative facts they don't become real facts.And the other deliberately slowed in a position where he knew it would likely cause an incident. They were both at fault.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/40400301
... The stewards examined data from his car and found that he had maintained a more or less constant speed, had not lifted off the throttle or braked, and had behaved no differently at that restart at that point on the track than at the other two restarts.
1 person at fault for both events.
The stewards report said he didn't lift off "completely", he still lifted.See post above. If you repeat alternative facts they don't become real facts.
And the other deliberately slowed in a position where he knew it would likely cause an incident. They were both at fault.
Didn't even know people had drivers they support.
I've been watching for years and i don't support anybody.
Nobody is calling him a saint. F1 greats are never saints. But he did nothing wrong.Cool, so it's definitive then. Hamilton a saint confirmed.
Looked a bit different on tv but what do I know.
Or you know, vettel accelerated too soon anticipating Hamilton would, akin to jump starting.I should want to like Hamilton, British and all that, but the lad is just such a bellend...
Not on todays performance, but in general. What Vettel did was wrong, but I do think Hamilton slowed down. It looked nothing but.
I'm at Silverstone in a couple of weeks and I will be supporting Vettel
Jenson Button. Now he was a driver that anybody could like...
We've gone from stopped, braked hard, braked, and now lifted. Progress!The stewards report said he didn't lift off "completely", he still lifted.
I never said any of those things but ok.We've gone from stopped, braked hard, braked, and now lifted. Progress!
I'm more or less convinced now, now that FIA has found nothing wrong.
Or you know, vettel accelerated too soon anticipating Hamilton would, akin to jump starting.
Why is this even allowed? It's dangerous and at the very least looks like unsportsmanlike behaviour. To me at least.Even if you went with the onboard, he slowed for and through the corner and just didn't accelerate (and it was not abrupt, he scrubbed about 20-30kph off through the corner up until being rear ended which considering F1 cars performance is absolutely nothing) which he is perfectly entitled to do as he is now the pace car. If it also the way he has restarted on previous laps as well it is not erratic and unexpected. It's something we've seen on numerous restarts throughout the history of F1 when they 'back the pack up'. If a car in front of you on the motorway slows down you don't start to preempt them accelerating again, you slow down too.
Have to agree with this.Don't buy that now, at first I thought he might have been a bit naughty but the fact the FIA said he did not deviate from what he had done on previous laps and the fact they have reviewed actual telemetry and don't feel he slowed abnormally is damning.
Others here did even citing the telemetry data showing otherwise. So we have progress.I never said any of those things but ok.
The VSC makes far more sense. Keep well earned gaps that way as well.Why is this even allowed? It's dangerous and at the very least looks like unsportsmanlike behaviour. To me at least.
I love telementry, proves all you need. Regardless of that the move after was a discgrace.
Why is this even allowed? It's dangerous and at the very least looks like unsportsmanlike behaviour. To me at least.
You know that how?And the other deliberately slowed in a position where he knew it would likely cause an incident. They were both at fault.
Because he's not stupid?You know that how?
Will Buxton not giving up
At that second, no. But underlying damage may become evident at 180mph on a straight. Kind of dangerous then I think you'd agree.There's a difference between madness and stupidity. This wasn't even dangerous in any way.