sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,927
When Dyche keeps them up after a 10 point deduction, its going to be some flex for old gravel throat.
115 charges v 1 charge.I'm an old geezer. I don't understand why city has not been punished. Did they offer bigger bribes?
I guess I think if the reduction piece (sponsorship levels decreasing due to performance) is well know, it’s odd we’ve never heard of the latter.None of us are party to the details of sponsorship agreements so we can't say for definite either way, but such incentive type agreements are commonplace in business so it's not unrealistic to say that they may exist in sponsorship deals
I guess I think if the reduction piece (sponsorship levels decreasing due to performance) is well know, it’s odd we’ve never heard of the latter.
Righto chiefThis is conspiracy speak honestly
How do the PL justify City being guilty of the charges, but getting a less punishment than City?
And the PL can't influence the verdict, it's been referred to an independent panel.
Interesting. Thanks, yes hopefully we find out the details of what City has.
That is a good point - maybe more common when clubs look upwards at big qualification targets.I wonder if it depends on the general level of the club.
United's deal is a maximum that assumes CL qualification, and is reduced if that isn't achieved, but a side like Brighton might have more of a baseline deal that involves "bonuses" for European qualification.
Righto chief
If that’s the formula, why did the PL ask for a 12 point deduction?For anybody wondering why it's ten points,
It was related specifically to the amount of losses over the £105 million threshold. Any amount over at all is an automatic 6 points, and then every £5 million chunk of the overage amount garners one more additional point.
They didn't arbitrarily decide on 10 points from scratch, then. It was based on a standard calculation. £19.7 million / £5m = 4 points + 6 automatic points = 10 point deduction.
Probably outsourced their accounting dept to PGMOLIf that’s the formula, why did the PL ask for a 12 point deduction?
One is backed by a nation state with limitless funds and huge influence in UK and european football.Are Everton's owners too broke to hire some goons who could have influenced their ruling one way or another?
FFP : prevents Leeds, Portsmouth from happening again.FFP: elitist ring fencing BS.
But who are city. Everton are a bigger club than city. City were a league 2 bumbling mess who only got lucky because they had Manchester in their club name. Without the cheating they wouldn’t be winning that trebleIt’s the same logic behind the saying that if you owe your bank £100,000, you have problem, whereas if you owe your bank £100 million, the bank has a problem.
If they give City - the treble winners, the poster boys for the league - the punishment they obviously deserve, that will have serious ramifications for the league and English football. Whereas with Everton - who’s Everton?
Wait, wait; they admitted that they did it? Oh boy....what a bad move.
@SilentWitness . Am i reading that right? You did admit it (instead doing City and stalling)?
Hard to take the league seriously when Everton were massively punished like this and this fast too, while City has been alleged with ton of FFP charges for years and there hasn't been a single decision taken, not even a fine.
Well the powers that be have set a precedent now, 10 point deduction per FFP breach.
So presumably City are now inline for a potential points deduction of 1,150 points...
It was fast because they pled guilty and it was a single chargeHard to take the league seriously when Everton were massively punished like this and this fast too, while City has been alleged with ton of FFP charges for years and there hasn't been a single decision taken, not even a fine.
Given what has just happened to Everton , city are in for one hell of a beating, danish commentator 1981 styleI agree with this. Banish the club completely from any competition for 5 years... I can dream eh . The owners should be banished though, 115 charges is just outrageous. I'm just waiting for the technicalities to come out and they get off with a big fine.
Wait, wait; they admitted that they did it? Oh boy....what a bad move.
@SilentWitness . Am i reading that right? You did admit it (instead doing City and stalling)?
Well the powers that be have set a precedent now, 10 point deduction per FFP breach.
So presumably City are now inline for a potential points deduction of 1,150 points...
For anybody wondering why it's ten points,
It was related specifically to the amount of losses over the £105 million threshold. Any amount over at all is an automatic 6 points, and then every £5 million chunk of the overage amount garners one more additional point.
They didn't arbitrarily decide on 10 points from scratch, then. It was based on a standard calculation. £19.7 million / £5m = 4 points + 6 automatic points = 10 point deduction.
Is there any explanation why City havent been hit with this sort of fine?
I dont mean any conspiracy theory but any sort of explanation from the EPL?