Do you mean Britain being at the heart of a liberal and progressive European Union, upon which any country could base its economic stability? Oh wait...
As opposed to the alternative, a Britain marginalised, ostracised and subservient to the whims of the EU because a bunch of charlatans promised us milk, honey, and gobbies for everyone if we leave. See I can be hyperbolic too.
I think thats the most disappointing thing about this debate, because the EU is not perfect, nor should we assume that our membership in it is now – or will always be – a good thing. Yet only one side of the debate actually appears to have any interest whatsoever in discussing the arguments. For all the criticism of the Remain campaign's claims of a post Brexit UK they, at least, exist. The Leave Campaign have seemed content to whine about Remain, push half-truths, and lie. You will claim that the UK will not be beholden to EU law after a Brexit, but yet -still- no case has been made for what we
would do. It seems, to me at least, a tactic admission that no post-EU Britain would actually be worth the uncertainty of leaving Europe. You might argue otherwise, but until Leave can come up with a coherent plan, it seems awfully like they're dodging the question. In fact, looking at their 35 page pdf all they actually do is scaremonger about a future in the EU, but, of course, only one side of this debate is Project Fear.
This is a decision -and this is probably the one point that we actually agree on- that is one of the most important that we will have to make as a country for the foreseeable future. Surely what we need is an informed debate. Blatantly lying to the electorate as Vote Leave are doing with this ridiculous figure is to no-ones benefit. Yes you can argue that we'd have greater control over the money if we left, but according to polling issues of sovereignty are less important to people than economics, so I guess Vote Leave see lying about the economics to be a better vote winner.