Gehrman
Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 11,884
I'm glad we didn't sign him with that release clause. Can you imagine the circus that would have brought?
A title challenge?
I'm glad we didn't sign him with that release clause. Can you imagine the circus that would have brought?
The list is in comparison to Haaland. Not each entry in comparison to the next one.
I picked Lukaku as a comparison before I saw the feature, but their profiles really do look kind of similar:
The list is in comparison to Haaland. Not each entry in comparison to the next one.
I picked Lukaku as a comparison before I saw the feature, but their profiles really do look kind of similar:
You can get there without the circus. The club did right to reject that deal, similar to Juve and who knows what other big clubs were in the picture. That is not a compromise big clubs can ever make. He'll move next summer anyway.A title challenge?
That’s never guaranteed, whoever you buy but as @jackal&hyde there would be a lot of unwanted attention from both the media and other clubs if we had of agreed to that let alone fat lad throwing his weight about.A title challenge?
I still fail to understand the logic why signing him then with a release clause, and afterwards persuading him to stay, sign a new contract and get rid of the clause, would have been a less reasonable and more difficult thing to do than not buying him for 20m €, seeing him kill at another club for two seasons, and then trying to sign him for more money and among bigger competition.I'm glad we didn't sign him with that release clause. Can you imagine the circus that would have brought?
You can get there without the circus. The club did right to reject that deal, similar to Juve and who knows what other big clubs were in the picture. That is not a compromise big clubs can ever make. He'll move next summer anyway.
Maybe he is quite similar to the Lukaku we are seeing at Inter? But Haaland is better technically.
I would argue that Haaland is very similar to Ruud. But faster and bigger (he has not used that much yet, but is starting to).
I still fail to understand the logic why signing him then with a release clause, and afterwards persuading him to stay, sign a new contract and get rid of the clause, would have been a less reasonable and more difficult thing to do than not buying him for 20m, seeing him kill at another club for 2 seasons, € and then trying to sign him two years later for more money and among bigger competition.
If his wish were to play for your club, which is the prerequisite for signing him anyway, why wouldn't he stay?
Or are you secretly worried that, once he got to actually experience your club from the inside, he'd want out again quickly, as did happen with most star signing of the last 7 years?
His numbers are crazy. He looks like some sort of alien on the pitch lurching and learing after the ball. Strange player but one we need to sign.
Utd don't bow to release clauses and that's 100% the correct attitude. If a player doesn't want to commit his all to this team then it doesn't matter how good he is, he wont be welcome.Yeah I'm puzzled by this as well. Lets not sign for 20 mil because he might not want to stay, but then compete for him later for far higher transfer fee's and wages in competition with all the big clubs aching for a great striker.
Why didn't all other big Clubs go for him for 20m and now would suddenly compete by offering far higher fee's and wages ,maybe he just didn't want to directly go to a Big club he needed intermediate Club for Step Up and everything else is just pure noise from Club as well as the player.Yeah I'm puzzled by this as well. Lets not sign for 20 mil because he might not want to stay, but then compete for him later for far higher transfer fee's and wages in competition with all the big clubs aching for a great striker.
I still fail to understand the logic why signing him then with a release clause, and afterwards persuading him to stay, sign a new contract and get rid of the clause, would have been a less reasonable and more difficult thing to do than not buying him for 20m €, seeing him kill at another club for two seasons, and then trying to sign him for more money and among bigger competition.
If his wish were to play for your club, which is the prerequisite for signing him anyway, why wouldn't he stay?
Or are you secretly worried that, once he got to actually experience your club from the inside, he'd want out again quickly, as did happen with most star signings of the last 7 years?
Would Bayern have agreed to such conditions for any player thinking of joining the club no matter how good he is? If the answer is no then no further explanation is neededI still fail to understand the logic why signing him then with a release clause, and afterwards persuading him to stay, sign a new contract and get rid of the clause, would have been a less reasonable and more difficult thing to do than not buying him for 20m €, seeing him kill at another club for two seasons, and then trying to sign him for more money and among bigger competition.
If his wish were to play for your club, which is the prerequisite for signing him anyway, why wouldn't he stay?
Or are you secretly worried that, once he got to actually experience your club from the inside, he'd want out again quickly, as did happen with most star signings of the last 7 years?
I think that shows pretty well that Lukaku is significantly more involved in build up. The way he brings team mates into play and shields the ball really impressed me the few times I've seen him play for Inter. Not sure he was very consistent at that when playing for United. Haaland's passing is equally good but he rarely seems to hold on to the ball to let the team advance, but that's probably down to tactics.The list is in comparison to Haaland. Not each entry in comparison to the next one.
I picked Lukaku as a comparison before I saw the feature, but their profiles really do look kind of similar:
We aren't Bayern. We are Liverpool of the 2000s under Hicks and Gillette. But we won't be so lucky to have the courts force a sale.Would Bayern have agreed to such conditions for any player thinking of joining the club no matter how good he is? If the answer is no then no further explanation is needed
I don't know the answer, to be honest. It's true we don't usually do release clauses. But, I think if we'd been in need and looking for a striker that season, we'd been very tempted to make concessions in order to snap up a top prospect that cheaply.Would Bayern have agreed to such conditions for any player thinking of joining the club no matter how good he is? If the answer is no then no further explanation is needed
That goal against PSG. Lives rent free in my head.
Im hearing Chelsea are also in for him. Are we his preferred destination of city aren’t interested in him? I’d really hate for us to lose out like we did hazard.
They aren't going to pay him more than we can afford, clubs have wage structures and Chelsea don't pay big wages.I’d love him at United but there isn’t a chance he’ll come here. PSG, City or Chelsea can blow everyone else out of the water.
I’d love him at United but there isn’t a chance he’ll come here. PSG, City or Chelsea can blow everyone else out of the water.
Don't think any club will pay that in the current climate. He is going to leave on the release clause imo or slightly more if Dortmund accept it this summer or next winter. Clubs just don't have that kind of cash anymore.With his buyout clause activating next year no way he could cost more than 120-140 mil.
No brainer, go and bid that and let him make the choice.
He would be the biggest reason to keep Ole on tbh
Bollocks. Ole was the only reason he was at all considering it. His original plan was always to take it step by step. But now, United would be the perfect next move, with a manager he has a great relationship with, and a style of play that suits him just perfectly.If Ole was such a factor, he would already be playing for you.
No, I meant the "nobody loves me" syndrome.If it means not setting myself up for a disappointing transfer window then 100% yes. We probably only have about £100M to spend, if we waste all our time on Haaland and inevitably fail to get him we’ll panic and spend it on more average players.
Comparing like this is of no good, Serie A is not Champions League or Premier League, how well did you think Lukaku did when he was at Old Trafford?Benzema stats looks similar and even better, Lewandowski report is almost same as Lukaku's, doubt anyone would call them as similar players.
The way Lukaku is playing at Inter, yes you can see why they are compared.