- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,377
Haaland, he just scores in almost every game and looks threat in every game. He will break many goal scoring records.
I think Haaland will sign for City. Augero time is almost up and G.Jesus is not good enough.
Doesn't his release clause become effective next summer? If so, there won't be any shortage of interested parties.Haaland, easily.
Expect Raiola to whip up a mind blowing bidding war (my money is on City)
If Pep stays there for some reason (say they win the league) - I cant see him picking Haaland in my opinion.
He didnt want to start Aguero from the moment he came & as good as he has been I have a feeling he had a bit of force to play a legend of their club whilst he was better than Gabriel Jesus nearly every chance they got to play.
If the manager changes then yes City with all their history with the players dad etc.
If we progress under Ole to the point on a summer transfer window that we are looking like a trophy winning team & we are still playing 4222, 442 diamond, 352 or maybe even the 4231 - I can see us trying to convince Haaland to come with Ole convincing him that this is his next step in the PL.
Raiola will use Utd as the underbidder to ramp up his price, then probably tell us to feck off. (though, Pogba wanting out may have some bearing)Doesn't his release clause become effective next summer? If so, there won't be any shortage of interested parties.
Which club avoids buying Raiola players? The fact that this is a case shows me something.
Is it Haaland day today?
Casting doubts on Lukaku's intelligence is a bit harsh I think, he speaks well and is respectful from what I have seen.Haaland is far more mobile, two footed and intelligent than Lukaku
You'll be telling me next he's on Mastermind; specialist subject:PointingCasting doubts on Lukaku's intelligence is a bit harsh I think, he speaks well and is respectful from what I have seen.
Do people really expect us to sign either of these players?
We will still be interested in Sancho, but not for anything close to 120 mil. If Dortmund don’t lower the price big time and Sancho doesn’t force a move then we will and should move on, especially if the 2 kids we have bought look promising over the course of the season.Do people really expect us to sign either of these players?
I voted for Sancho as I think Ole is looking to play a fluid front 3 but then he also wanted Haaland so it's hard to say for sure. Truth is I don't see us getting either, the chance to get Sancho is gone imo and Dortmund won't sell Haaland until 2022 unless a club offers double his buyout clause imo, plus he already turned us down.
It could be kneelingYou'll be telling me next he's on Mastermind; specialist subject:Pointing
And not to forget doesn't have the first touch of a person touching "don't touch me" plant.Haaland is far more mobile, two footed and intelligent than Lukaku
Transfer fee, yes but Raiola and Co are certain to ask for massive agent and signing on fee not to mention wages. I'd be surprised if there's more than a couple of clubs who'll be able to afford the package especially as it'll all have to be upfront.Doesn't his release clause become effective next summer? If so, there won't be any shortage of interested parties.
And its 60 mil, right?Transfer fee, yes but Raiola and Co are certain to ask for massive agent and signing on fee not to mention wages. I'd be surprised if there's more than a couple of clubs who'll be able to afford the package especially as it'll all have to be upfront.
Re the clause date, there's too much confusion. Most journos reported 2022 summer but haaland was asked about it in an interview recently and there the interviewer mentioned 2021
65 iircAnd its 60 mil, right?
I think a certain Harry Kane may disagreeHaaland for sure. There hasn't been a striker of his caliber since the Lewa, Benz, Aguero, Suarez, Cavani generation. Plus he has to size to bully any defense, fancy him to score at least a brace even on a cold rainy night at Stoke.
If Kane moved to a club with any semblance of title winning expectations and then did it, I'd agree.I think a certain Harry Kane may disagree
Is this the same Kane who had 3 EPL goals to his name when he turned 21?I think a certain Harry Kane may disagree
Kane does it in the most competitive league in the world and Haaland has not as yet but I would be interested to see what sort of stats he knocks up if he makes the step up.Is this the same Kane who had 3 EPL goals to his name when he turned 21?
Fantastic striker, don't get me wrong, but his numbers looks average next to Haalands' numbers last season. And so does everyone elses for that matter, and he was 19 at the time.
Even Kanes' two best seasons (2016-2018) comes way short of what Haaland did last season:
Kane 2016/17 - 41 goals and 5 assists in 3953 minutes. 96 min/goal, 86 min/contribution
Kane 2017/18 - 35 goals and 7 assists in 3154 minutes. 90 min/goal, 75 min/contribution
Haaland 2019/20- 44 goals and 10 assists in 2751 minutes, 63 min/goal, 51 min/contribution
In words: Kane had a 50% worse goal and contribution rate per 90 than 19 years old Haaland in his so far peak seasons. 50% !! The difference between world class and generational talent.
He has started this season on recordbreaking form though.