Deery
Dreary
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
- Messages
- 18,590
Great finish, I think we’re witnessing the beginning of the new best player in the world..
It didn`t work because his agency wanted a release clause which shows he wanted a stepping stone first. If that get out of jail free card clause wasn`t part of the deal it would be a different story. His next move will be a more permanent/long term one provided we are competitive in some way Ole and Haaland`s history may be beneficial next time round. Like I said there will be competition but never say neverOle's history with Haaland didn't work when the choice was between United and Dortmund. Why would it work now when every big club will be after him? He will be the most sought after player in the world
If we stick to a 442 diamond or a 352 then we need 2 right footed attackers competing (Rashford & Martial) playing on the other side of 2 left footed strikers competing (Haaland & Greenwood)
They can all play around with each other so they aren't just playing for one slot but that's an evenly balanced 4 strikers for every position we need.
So Dortmund won’t even be receiving 75m euro as part of that fee is going to Raiola. My heart bleeds for Dortmund
It makes it even more lucrative for Dortmund to sell him this summer in that case as they would be able to get a significantly bigger fee.
Or he turns into a Rooney and he is already heading towards peaking as a player?The kid is going to be the best isn't he. It's actually ridiculous that he is doing what he is doing, and at that age it's unheard of.
Or he turns into a Rooney and he is already heading towards peaking as a player?
The quesiton I then ask, who was a bigger talent at this age? Rooney or Haaland?
True. Rooney was doing big things at an early age. But it would be wrong to insinuate that Rooney was heading towards peaking as a player at the age of 20. It's just weird. They play football professionally for about 15 years, more or less, and time speaks for itself. I don't think there is anything here other than to say both players is insanely good at an early age. Different bodies, different nationalities, personalities, different era and different style. I would much rather compare him to Zlatan because I see more similarities between them in build and mentality, so if anything I think he'll have long and fruitful career with few distractions, little pressure and always taking care of his body. All things that influenced Rooney and ultimately how he is perceived now in hindsight.Or he turns into a Rooney and he is already heading towards peaking as a player?
The quesiton I then ask, who was a bigger talent at this age? Rooney or Haaland?
Rooney without a doubt. Haaland is a great talent, but Rooney had the x-factor so few players have. Haaland could clearly end up the better player, but he’s got a bloody long way to go.
Really? Scored a hat trick on his CL debut and then failed to do anything until the Roma games in 07 almost 2 years later. Rooney always seemed to struggle in the Champions League. His levels of performance went up a level in 09/10 once Ronnie left but that was mid way through his career. Haaland at 20 years old has 12 CL goals, it took Rooney till he was 22 to get there. I always felt he lived in Ronnies shadow for far, far too long and he never truly reached his peak.
Whether Haaland can match Rooneys overall ability and accomplishments is the real question, but a 20 year old Haaland is imo a better player than Rooney at 20. Although it's hard to fully compare the two given Rooney tended to play wide and sacrificed himself for the team early on. I actually see a lot of Rooney in Haaland, he's got that same fire and energy.
so
We are just ignoring everything domestically?
its clearly very difficult to compare, as one has essentially completed his career, and the other at the very beginning.
I stand by my comments, that I’d take Rooney over Haaland. that doesn’t mean, I don’t think he’s a great player, and I’d take him at Uts every day of the week.
Rooney, and it’s not even close. Weird to say, since I’m Norwegian and never rated Rooney as one of the best players in the world during his time. Haaland is just made for scoring goals, which is the most important metric in football, but not the only one. If he can keep delivering beautiful assists (like so far this season), I think he’ll eventually surpass Rooney.Or he turns into a Rooney and he is already heading towards peaking as a player?
The quesiton I then ask, who was a bigger talent at this age? Rooney or Haaland?
I know these 4 will be quite the attacking threat but playing with 10 men only? I think that's pushing itYeh of course all 4 of them will all be happy to compete for 2 starting spots in our 442 diamond or 342 line up.
Rooney was a great player and was fantastic to watch on his days, but the fact that Rooney had freak physique for his small size and age, was English and had a great and long career with us doesn’t make him better than he actually was. Endproduct wise you’ll get 3x more goals from mr Haaland than from young Rooney. Rooney was a 200min per goal and 350min per assist guy throughout his career even when playing CF, and my guess is the Haaland will pass his career total in his mid 20s. Haaland was a late bloomer, and there is nothing indicating he will have an early downfall. There is not many players I would pick over young Rooney, but this one definitely is one of them.Or he turns into a Rooney and he is already heading towards peaking as a player?
The quesiton I then ask, who was a bigger talent at this age? Rooney or Haaland?
Haaland's 20, how the feck is he a late bloomer?Rooney was a great player and was fantastic to watch on his days, but the fact that Rooney had freak physique for his small size and age, was English and had a great and long career with us doesn’t make him better than he actually was. Endproduct wise you’ll get 3x more goals from mr Haaland than from young Rooney. Rooney was a 200min per goal and 350min per assist guy throughout his career even when playing CF, and my guess is the Haaland will pass his career total in his mid 20s. Haaland was a late bloomer, and there is nothing indicating he will have an early downfall. There is not many players I would pick over young Rooney, but this one definitely is one of them.
How standards have changed with time...'late bloomer' used to be someone like Vardy who bursts into the big scene past his mid-twenties. Haaland is 20 years old. He is definitely not a late bloomer in my book. The only way you can say that for him is in a comparison with a player like Rooney who became famous at 16. If that was all you meant, my apologies, this is not a dig in any sense, anyway.Rooney was a great player and was fantastic to watch on his days, but the fact that Rooney had freak physique for his small size and age, was English and had a great and long career with us doesn’t make him better than he actually was. Endproduct wise you’ll get 3x more goals from mr Haaland than from young Rooney. Rooney was a 200min per goal and 350min per assist guy throughout his career even when playing CF, and my guess is the Haaland will pass his career total in his mid 20s. Haaland was a late bloomer, and there is nothing indicating he will have an early downfall. There is not many players I would pick over young Rooney, but this one definitely is one of them.
How standards have changed with time...'late bloomer' used to be someone like Vardy who bursts into the big scene past his mid-twenties. Haaland is 20 years old. He is definitely not a late bloomer in my book. The only way you can say that for him is in a comparison with a player like Rooney who became famous at 16. If that was all you meant, my apologies, this is not a dig in any sense, anyway.
And I agree, Haaland will most likely surpass Rooney's output but that shouldn't diminish Wazza's contribution. He was playing in a completely different time. Now it is an attacker's game. VAR definitely helps attackers and the rules have become much stricter for defenders. Rooney was a pain in the a$s for any team he played against ever since he was 16. Roaming, marauding, physically imposing, creating and scoring. Just writing this got me reminiscing of his early days...What a player he was! Super happy we got to experience his career and see him perform for so many years.
When I said he was a late bloomer, I was referring to puberty and growth physically, not in football standards. Rooney was full grown at 15, while Haaland grew 20 cm that year....How standards have changed with time...'late bloomer' used to be someone like Vardy who bursts into the big scene past his mid-twenties. Haaland is 20 years old. He is definitely not a late bloomer in my book. The only way you can say that for him is in a comparison with a player like Rooney who became famous at 16. If that was all you meant, my apologies, this is not a dig in any sense, anyway.
And I agree, Haaland will most likely surpass Rooney's output but that shouldn't diminish Wazza's contribution. He was playing in a completely different time. Now it is an attacker's game. VAR definitely helps attackers and the rules have become much stricter for defenders. Rooney was a pain in the a$s for any team he played against ever since he was 16. Roaming, marauding, physically imposing, creating and scoring. Just writing this got me reminiscing of his early days...What a player he was! Super happy we got to experience his career and see him perform for so many years.
Tell that Morata
When I said he was a late bloomer, I was referring to puberty and growth physically, not in football standards. Rooney was full grown at 15, while Haaland grew 20 cm that year....Haaland's 20, how the feck is he a late bloomer?
Ah, pardon my comment then. I didn't know, I never followed him before Salzburg and he was fully grown thereWhen I said he was a late bloomer, I was referring to puberty and growth physically, not in football standards. Rooney was full grown at 15, while Haaland grew 20 cm that year....
Haaland's 20, how the feck is he a late bloomer?
Statements like this......I’d like to see what a young Rooney could do in this current football climate. I wouldn’t bet against a 20 year old Rooney in this Dortmund side would be putting up the same numbers or better than Haaland.
Statements like this......
Rooney (19) - 200 min/goal, 147 min/contribution
Rooney (20) - 212 min/goal, 139 min/contribution
Haaland (19 Only Dortmund) - 80 min/goal, 68 min/contribution
Haaland (20 so far) - 86 min/goal, 63 min/contribution
How? Why?
Rashford’s on 9 in 20 matches! Not too far away from those mentioned.No surprise; another CL goal tonight.
No player has ever scored more goals in his first 10 apps in the Champions League. Here is the top 4 list:
Haaland - 12
Kane - 9
Mane - 9
S. Inzaghi - 9
Not even a close competition.
Messi needed 25 matches to reach 12 CL goals
R9 needed 32 games to reach 12 CL goals
CR7 needed 47....
Are you saying that Rooney would be a 50 goal a season striker at 20 in todays Dortmund (Scoring 250%more than he did at here)?Rooney - Premier League goals per game at 19: 2.4
Haaland - Bundesliga goals per game at 19: 3.2
There‘s been a seismic shift towards attacking football in the last 15 years with a focus on attacking patterns. At the same age, he was playing behind Ruud who our entire play was centred towards. In a modern fluid system with two wide support players he would have excelled at that age. Comparing the league and system Haaland plays in with the league and system Rooney played in is like apples and oranges.
so
We are just ignoring everything domestically?
its clearly very difficult to compare, as one has essentially completed his career, and the other at the very beginning.
I stand by my comments, that I’d take Rooney over Haaland. that doesn’t mean, I don’t think he’s a great player, and I’d take him at Uts every day of the week.
Not to mention the quality of defenders across Europe has taken a nose dive compared to when Rooney was at that age and the difference in league quality.Rooney - Premier League goals per game at 19: 2.4
Haaland - Bundesliga goals per game at 19: 3.2
There‘s been a seismic shift towards attacking football in the last 15 years with a focus on attacking patterns. At the same age, he was playing behind Ruud who our entire play was centred towards. In a modern fluid system with two wide support players he would have excelled at that age. Comparing the league and system Haaland plays in with the league and system Rooney played in is like apples and oranges.
It's a very different football now compared to when Rooney burst into the scene. Defenders were a lot more active and physical in Rooney's time, to be fair. I'm not saying he will do similar to Haaland as he has never been the clinical strker type, but I'm sure he would have done quite alright and probably better than he did.Statements like this......
Rooney (19) - 200 min/goal, 147 min/contribution
Rooney (20) - 212 min/goal, 139 min/contribution
Haaland (19 Only Dortmund) - 80 min/goal, 68 min/contribution
Haaland (20 so far) - 86 min/goal, 63 min/contribution
How? Why?
No surprise; another CL goal tonight.
No player has ever scored more goals in his first 10 apps in the Champions League. Here is the top 4 list:
Haaland - 12
Kane - 9
Mane - 9
S. Inzaghi - 9
Not even a close competition.
Messi needed 25 matches to reach 12 CL goals
R9 needed 32 games to reach 12 CL goals
CR7 needed 47....
Statements like this......
Rooney (19) - 200 min/goal, 147 min/contribution
Rooney (20) - 212 min/goal, 139 min/contribution
Haaland (19 Only Dortmund) - 80 min/goal, 68 min/contribution
Haaland (20 so far) - 86 min/goal, 63 min/contribution
How? Why?
Can Ole convince him to join us? Ole's first real test.
Jokes aside, if we somehow manage to pull off both Haaland and Sancho it would be incredible.
I personally think Sancho is dead in the water now, and I really wouldn’t mind if it meant we could get Haaland.