Erling Haaland | Dortmund player

Anyone afraid of a bit of competition is never gonna make it.

I doubt this had anything to do with it.

The claim he wouldn't get minutes given United's limited options up front is laughable.

It isn’t though. Look at Martial for instance, as much as he’s played, this is his 5th season at the club and the first one he gets to be undisputed starting no.9, and that after we flogged off our previous £75m striker. Imagine how much further along he would be in his development if he didn’t have to shuffle between the left wing and the bench for 2.5 years under Mourinho.

Competition is good and all, but there’s a reason most clubs send out young players on loan at 18-19-20 once they’ve outgrown reserve football, unless there’s a clear path for them in the first team. They need to get as much minutes as possible at that stage.
 
I would take these reports whose sole purpose it is to explain why United didn't get/sign a highly rated player/youngster with a grain of salt.
 
Also, annoying how ruthlessly efficient Dortmund are in the transfer market. Not much of a peep from the media, whilst we're like a hippo slowly drowning in treacle.
It really is annoying. However hippos are surprisingly fast, so I don't think this is a correct comparison. I'd say we're more like koalas slowly burning alive in Australian forest fires.
 
It isn’t though. Look at Martial for instance, as much as he’s played, this is his 5th season at the club and the first one he gets to be undisputed starting no.9, and that after we flogged off our previous £75m striker. Imagine how much further along he would be in his development if he didn’t have to shuffle between the left wing and the bench for 2.5 years under Mourinho.

Competition is good and all, but there’s a reason most clubs send out young players on loan at 18-19-20 once they’ve outgrown reserve football, unless there’s a clear path for them in the first team. They need to get as much minutes as possible at that stage.

My point is that if he's as good as he's supposed to be he'd walk into United's first team and should back himself to do so.
 
I’m actually impressed with this move on his part. Shows that he prioritize his development over money.
Atm I strongly doubt this tbh.

If the reports about buyout clause and sale percentage are true then money is exactly what he and his father is after imo.

He is an unproven 19 years old so no way we could offer him a lucrative deal. I'd say 100 £k a week max, probably with a backup status contract, not even first team player.

Dortmund on the other hand must view him as a first team player. They'd offer him around 50 £k a week imo.

Which mean over 2-3 years here he would make an additional sum of 5 to 7 £m compared to Dortmund.

I have no idea about how much is his buyout clause and share percentage of the next sale at Dortmund but given that Raiola was involved, the buyout must be not too high to easily move him around but not too low so the shares would be sufficient. And the resale percentage must be pretty high. I'd say 60 £m and 25 % or even more. Which means 15 £m at the least next time he moves to another club. Not counting they'll get another signing on fee, agent fee compared to the move to Utd.

So, it's all about math and money imo. Which should be no surprise considering Raiola was involved.
 
I would take these reports whose sole purpose it is to explain why United didn't get/sign a highly rated player/youngster with a grain of salt.
But Dortmund is a second-rate club. All those reports do make sense seeing as they're a stepping-stone. Neither Juventus nor United nor any other historical big club would agree to the terms being put forward.
 
Anyone afraid of a bit of competition is never gonna make it.

I doubt this had anything to do with it.

The claim he wouldn't get minutes given United's limited options up front is laughable.

That's not what he's saying.
 
Its not so much us backing out, as us backing out from unacceptable deals. We can't live with a player having a buyout clause that clubs might trigger. This is not a selling club.

I'm just perplexed as to why the rags didn't report on the potential buyout clause before the deal was finalised. Seems very convenient and happens all too often. Deal gets done and suddenly the club that lost out lists tonnes of reason as to why they backed out. Release clauses can be renegotiated anyway, they're not that big of a deal, seeing as our policy is to reward our young players who are performing with bumper contracts anyway. Personally, I don't believe it. I don't blame the club though. I just think Haland chose Dortmund for footballing reasons.
 
I would take these reports whose sole purpose it is to explain why United didn't get/sign a highly rated player/youngster with a grain of salt.
It sounds like damage control from the club.
 
We need a striker though, so by that logic you're saying you wouldn't want a striker because he'll take minutes from Greenwood. You can't build a top side like that, you need quality in every position twice.

For what it's worth, I dont see a striker blocking Greenwood anyway. He'd continue to get his minutes from the right of a narrow 3.
We need a midfielder more and for all the transfer fee is small, the extra cash to his dad and Raiola pushes the cost up and we would likely pay him even more than Dortmund. That is money not going on a midfielder. The buyout clause is a nightmare and his dad and Raiola's cut of it.
 
But Dortmund is a second-rate club. All those reports do make sense seeing as they're a stepping-stone. Neither Juventus nor United nor any other historical big club would agree to the terms being put forward.
Juve agreed to a release clause when they bought De Ligt, and I believe Raiola was involved in that transaction too.
 
Knew someone would respond in a childish manner. It's not Uniteds fault you fall for speculation though.

Is it not possible that Haaland choose Dortmund because he will get the most playing time, and knows he will likely be able to move clubs in a few years time if he develops well?
God, the acolytes are dense. This club is pathetic at all levels and you're eating up the propaganda for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They love being linked with every transfer because the clicks mean more ad revenue. There's no efficient working relationship with agents. There's no vision. I can't wait for Ed Woodward's own 'Winning Edge: How to build a league winning side with a banker's mentality'.

People drinking the Koolaid and thinking Norwegian citizenship coupled with a manager with no stature in the game is going to lead to him signing. Unless they overpay by 40%, Sancho isn't coming. He left Pep and City to go to Dortmund just to come and play for OGS?? A segment of this fanbase is seriously deluded. We're an atrociously run amusement park at this point.
 
More urgent matters that need attending. Get a number 10, RW and midfielder in first. We can look at the striking options then.
 
We need a midfielder more and for all the transfer fee is small, the extra cash to his dad and Raiola pushes the cost up and we would likely pay him even more than Dortmund. That is money not going on a midfielder. The buyout clause is a nightmare and his dad and Raiola's cut of it.

Not saying midfield shouldn't be a priority. We are desperate for a striker too though, and all the add ons in the world still make this a low fee. Certainly when compared against going rate.
 
Off to the Odegaard thread when he is mismanaged by Madrid next season :drool:
 
If we didnt wanted to deal with Raiola we wouldn’t even approached him in the first place?

Im sorry but it all seems “We didn’t wanted it anyway” excuses
Well we did want him but pulled out due to demands.
 
I would take these reports whose sole purpose it is to explain why United didn't get/sign a highly rated player/youngster with a grain of salt.
As Dortmund fan I’d imagine it’s not pleasant for you to hear that he’d only move there because Utd doesn’t agree to a release clause, but do you actually have any cause to believe we’d agree to one?
My point is that if he's as good as he's supposed to be he'd walk into United's first team and should back himself to do so.
He’s an 18 year old kid who’ve mostly played in the Norwegian and Austrian league. Even Cristiano Ronaldo didn’t get to be undisputed starter for us at 18, and that’s with no one of the same age vying for the same spot.
 
Not saying midfield shouldn't be a priority. We are desperate for a striker too though, and all the add ons in the world still make this a low fee. Certainly when compared against going rate.
Just think if we bought a striker it needs to be someone as a backup with experience, not another kid.
 
God, the acolytes are dense. This club is pathetic at all levels and you're eating up the propaganda for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They love being linked with every transfer because the clicks mean more ad revenue. There's no efficient working relationship with agents. There's no vision. I can't wait for Ed Woodward's own 'Winning Edge: How to build a league winning side with a banker's mentality'.

People drinking the Koolaid and thinking Norwegian citizenship coupled with a manager with no stature in the game is going to lead to him signing. Unless they overpay by 40%, Sancho isn't coming. He left Pep and City to go to Dortmund just to come and play for OGS?? A segment of this fanbase is seriously deluded. We're an atrociously run amusement park at this point.
High caliber players dream of Lucien Favre at night?
 
God, the acolytes are dense. This club is pathetic at all levels and you're eating up the propaganda for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They love being linked with every transfer because the clicks mean more ad revenue. There's no efficient working relationship with agents. There's no vision. I can't wait for Ed Woodward's own 'Winning Edge: How to build a league winning side with a banker's mentality'.

People drinking the Koolaid and thinking Norwegian citizenship coupled with a manager with no stature in the game is going to lead to him signing. Unless they overpay by 40%, Sancho isn't coming. He left Pep and City to go to Dortmund just to come and play for OGS?? A segment of this fanbase is seriously deluded. We're an atrociously run amusement park at this point.

:lol:
 
God, the acolytes are dense. This club is pathetic at all levels and you're eating up the propaganda for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They love being linked with every transfer because the clicks mean more ad revenue. There's no efficient working relationship with agents. There's no vision. I can't wait for Ed Woodward's own 'Winning Edge: How to build a league winning side with a banker's mentality'.

People drinking the Koolaid and thinking Norwegian citizenship coupled with a manager with no stature in the game is going to lead to him signing. Unless they overpay by 40%, Sancho isn't coming. He left Pep and City to go to Dortmund just to come and play for OGS?? A segment of this fanbase is seriously deluded. We're an atrociously run amusement park at this point.
Feck off.
 
Oh man, that's pretty fecked up, thought he was nailed to join us. He's made a right choice though, so did BVB, we fecked it up.
 
Im very disappointed.
And for that price he is a fecking bargin.
Dortmund have gotten themselves a great striker,will be interesting to see Sancho and Haaland link up.

Hope we go for a midfielder or a 10 in January then.
 
Odds on Martial to pull his hamstring at the Emirates and Haaland to bag a hat-trick in his debut?
 
I honestly think not buying anymore Raiola players is a great thing. Klopp and Pep don't go near Raiola players with a barge pole. We need to take a leaf from their book.

If Haaland scored 20 in his first season here, Raiola would be demanding increase in salary to 500,000 a week, or else he forces a move to Madrid. We don't need that shit here anymore.

Berbatov reckons Haaland is a Lukaku clone and he could have a point. Greenwood will be our strike sensation for years to come. There's some good strikers out there if we decide to buy another. Osimhen, Timo Werner, Moussa Dembele etc
 
Disappointing but not the end of the world. With Martial and Greenwood up front and Rashford as a backup, we probably need wingers, in particular a right winger and probably need another young winger to come through.
 
Few really lose their shit when some young player signs for other clubs :lol:
 
Atm I strongly doubt this tbh.

If the reports about buyout clause and sale percentage are true then money is exactly what he and his father is after imo.

He is an unproven 19 years old so no way we could offer him a lucrative deal. I'd say 100 £k a week max, probably with a backup status contract, not even first team player.

Dortmund on the other hand must view him as a first team player. They'd offer him around 50 £k a week imo.

Which mean over 2-3 years here he would make an additional sum of 5 to 7 £m compared to Dortmund.

I have no idea about how much is his buyout clause and share percentage of the next sale at Dortmund but given that Raiola was involved, the buyout must be not too high to easily move him around but not too low so the shares would be sufficient. And the resale percentage must be pretty high. I'd say 60 £m and 25 % or even more. Which means 15 £m at the least next time he moves to another club. Not counting they'll get another signing on fee, agent fee compared to the move to Utd.

So, it's all about math and money imo. Which should be no surprise considering Raiola was involved.
That’s assuming he wouldn’t get a new contract and a pay raise at Utd in the same timeframe, with all the sign on bonuses. Also 7m guaranteed in the bank > potential 15m few years down the line. Loss of form, illness, injuries, not getting confidence of the coach can happen.