Adisa
likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Not the kind of player I want at my club.
He's just got too much ego, and not enough brains. He's an idiot for burning his bridges with the club so easily. He's been given every chance to be a success here and backed well. His loss. He just couldn't hack it here, I'm still baffled by how badly its gone wrong.
Also he is a bit of an idiot himself.I think it's been clear from the second he or whoever did the social media post, he's surrounded himself with utter idiots who tell him he's gods gift to football.
They're keeping ETH, how smart can they be ?I think INEOS are smart enough to know that would be the wrong move.
Whoever sides with Sancho is an idiot and should leave with him once he is soldNot the kind of player I want at my club.
Not a chance. They are skint.Hopefully juve open up their wallet
Maybe not force ETH to use him, but perhaps have him training with the squad. If he's problematic amongst the group then have him train with the reserves. Not Sancho related but the way in which it's normalised in football to cast a player to to train on their own or with kids as a long term punishment isn't a good reflection on football in general. Serious disciplinary actions are one thing but it's too common a thing in my opinion.If there ain't serious bids and now that INEOS are controlling all football matters, could they force ETH to use him ?
Exactly. Ten Hag is faultless in this fiasco in my humble opinion. This situation is all Sancho.Still some fans backing Sancho. Taken the club for a ride and when the manager stamps down it's his fault the players don't perform apparently.
I don’t think he is the kind of character we will force out like that, he’ll just take his huge wage and sit at home. We’d end up losing him for free.We should only permit a loan move in the January window for him, keep an incentive for him to take a permanent transfer if one presents in the summer. If he doesn't leave, make him train with the U18's and no game time. Might take another season but he'll go eventually.
I don’t think he is the kind of character we will force out like that, he’ll just take his huge wage and sit at home. We’d end up losing him for free.
Sounds like he surrounded himself with CAF muppets. Where was the "Sancho or Messi" thread back then, anyway?I think it's been clear from the second he or whoever did the social media post, he's surrounded himself with utter idiots who tell him he's gods gift to football.
Being paid a weekly amount of money that the average fan would have to break their back for years for and then refusing to work because ‘apologizing is not for the streets’.Exactly. Ten Hag is faultless in this fiasco in my humble opinion. This situation is all Sancho.
Agree. It will mean taking a financial hit but having a “no dickheads” culture has to start somewhere.I think we have to call his bluff though, we can't encourage underperformers to stay at United where they are safe in the knowledge that they'll get a loan move each year. He needs to sit out for 6 months and then go on loan to recoup some of his wages and potentially build interest for the summer.
Agree. It will mean taking a financial hit but having a “no dickheads” culture has to start somewhere.
You’d think that having the Summer off, when he should have been tearing it up at the Euros, would make him reflect. Can’t see it though.
It’s funny because before all of this he had his personal issues that we gave him 6 months off for. Everyone of those seemed to have forgotten about this. He’s a ungrateful prick and he needs to leave this club permanentlyStill some fans backing Sancho. Taken the club for a ride and when the manager stamps down it's his fault the players don't perform apparently.
If the owners are backing ten Hag then they need to show it. Take 35-40m and move on. Casemiro needs to go, and young, hungry players need to be brought in. He has shown he works well with young players.
Yeah it wont happen without him taking a pay cut, even then its an opening price that we wouldn't reach.I clearly don't rate Sancho, on the basis on what he's done here, so I might be biased, but do you really think someone would pay £35m for him?
I think this is almost a situation where even the interested clubs wouldn't want to pay a fee for him. We've had a few players like that in recent years. I'm sure there would be a few clubs that might be ok with a loan, but that's very different to a transfer fee and a 4-5 year deal.
There were some using the Sancho situation as a stick to beat ten Hag with, where are they now? Ten Hag rightfully called the petulant little shit out for his poor attitude.
I clearly don't rate Sancho, on the basis on what he's done here, so I might be biased, but do you really think someone would pay £35m for him?
I think this is almost a situation where even the interested clubs wouldn't want to pay a fee for him. We've had a few players like that in recent years. I'm sure there would be a few clubs that might be ok with a loan, but that's very different to a transfer fee and a 4-5 year deal.
Very few clubs can afford his wages & Sancho doesn't seem the type to take a pay cut.I clearly don't rate Sancho, on the basis on what he's done here, so I might be biased, but do you really think someone would pay £35m for him?
I think this is almost a situation where even the interested clubs wouldn't want to pay a fee for him. We've had a few players like that in recent years. I'm sure there would be a few clubs that might be ok with a loan, but that's very different to a transfer fee and a 4-5 year deal.
No PL sales
Why not? We can feck up a rival.No PL sales
No PL sales
Believe what you want.I still believe that ETH is not good for Man Utd, he is a bad manager, and he has been and remains a liability for our club. The players of this club are the assets of this club, ETH is just a liability.
The manager has to find a way to get more value for each asset, that's the definition of a good manager for any type of business. ETH is the opposite of that. He has destroyed the value of the assets of this club. A manager who buys high (Antony et al), or sells low (Sancho) is not a good manager.
Even if Sancho is not good enough for Man Utd and should be sold, the handling by ETH was that of a really bad, petulant manager. I understand that some fans see the whole situation as a "manager vs players" war, and prefer to support the manager against the players. However, this is by definition just another failure of this bad manager. The manager and the players are not antagonists, they are members of the same team.
Again, in any business, not just football, a manager who creates situations "manager vs subordinates" is a bad manager. ETH is a bad manager. I am afraid we will just lose another year with him, and he will leave the team in the worst state of the last 10 years.
Ferguson was a bad manager then. Huh.I still believe that ETH is not good for Man Utd, he is a bad manager, and he has been and remains a liability for our club. The players of this club are the assets of this club, ETH is just a liability.
The manager has to find a way to get more value for each asset, that's the definition of a good manager for any type of business. ETH is the opposite of that. He has destroyed the value of the assets of this club. A manager who buys high (Antony et al), or sells low (Sancho) is not a good manager.
Even if Sancho is not good enough for Man Utd and should be sold, the handling by ETH was that of a really bad, petulant manager. I understand that some fans see the whole situation as a "manager vs players" war, and prefer to support the manager against the players. However, this is by definition just another failure of this bad manager. The manager and the players are not antagonists, they are members of the same team.
Again, in any business, not just football, a manager who creates situations "manager vs subordinates" is a bad manager. ETH is a bad manager. I am afraid we will just lose another year with him, and he will leave the team in the worst state of the last 10 years.
I still believe that ETH is not good for Man Utd, he is a bad manager, and he has been and remains a liability for our club. The players of this club are the assets of this club, ETH is just a liability.
The manager has to find a way to get more value for each asset, that's the definition of a good manager for any type of business. ETH is the opposite of that. He has destroyed the value of the assets of this club. A manager who buys high (Antony et al), or sells low (Sancho) is not a good manager.
Even if Sancho is not good enough for Man Utd and should be sold, the handling by ETH was that of a really bad, petulant manager. I understand that some fans see the whole situation as a "manager vs players" war, and prefer to support the manager against the players. However, this is by definition just another failure of this bad manager. The manager and the players are not antagonists, they are members of the same team.
Again, in any business, not just football, a manager who creates situations "manager vs subordinates" is a bad manager. ETH is a bad manager. I am afraid we will just lose another year with him, and he will leave the team in the worst state of the last 10 years.