alexthelion
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
- Messages
- 3,877
Not just Sancho, some of the posters in here do as well.Lad needs to grow up.
Not just Sancho, some of the posters in here do as well.Lad needs to grow up.
Like saying he would be in contention for a place the following week?You know, the phrases managers dish out all the time. It's really basic leadership practice, surround your criticism with praise. That concept even has a name (Harvard Sandwich approach). Give the recipient the impression he's valued and avoid that he feels humiliated, especially when other people are listening (as in this case).
You really believe that ETH had said nothing to Sancho before this?"I just want to talk about the players in the squad today."
Go back to Manchester. If Sancho has an issue, sit down with him Monday morning.
Simple.
He has never said anything like that and his best performances have always been on the right
But sancho tweeting about something he need not have made the matter worse. Imagine had he not even shared anything and just like any other professional individual kept his head down and worked hard , maybe he would have been playing now.
You really believe that ETH had said nothing to Sancho before this?
What about his extended 'holiday' last season?
Pep didn't have any credit in the bank when he started his Barca career and quickly shipped out Ronaldinho, made players like Henry and Eto'o play in unfavoured positions and conform to his new way of playing. It's plain double standards with an added pinch of hindsight.
I'm not even getting into him 'calling players out pubically" because that never happened; and he has quite obviously tried to keep this in-house for as long as possible; at some point questions need to be answered.
Pep got rid of him once before and Klopp likes players who fights, not too worried about that scenario.Just out of curiosity, a question for the people who want to get rid of Sancho immediately in January, imagine the following:
Sancho's price is now around 35-40 million because the whole world knows that MU doesn't plan with him and wants to get rid of him at any price. In January, only 2 clubs show interest and are willing to buy him for that price. If Sancho is not sold to one of these two clubs, his price will drop to 20 million in the summer.
The two clubs in question are Liverpool and ManCity.
So the question is:
Do you sell him to one of them because he sucks anyway (Antony is better, works harder) and is a petulant little bastard (too big an ego, doesn't integrate into the team, doesn't apologise to the manager) so one of the rivals suffers too?
Or are you afraid that Klopp/Pep will somehow get to grips with him so that he is suddenly back in top form, so that you are prepared to take a major financial loss but wait until the summer to sell him at a lower price but not to Klopp/Pep?
We should engage Xabi Alonso, before he takes Real Madrid
I'm willing to bet any amount of money that both of those teams won't be interested.Just out of curiosity, a question for the people who want to get rid of Sancho immediately in January, imagine the following:
Sancho's price is now around 35-40 million because the whole world knows that MU doesn't plan with him and wants to get rid of him at any price. In January, only 2 clubs show interest and are willing to buy him for that price. If Sancho is not sold to one of these two clubs, his price will drop to 20 million in the summer.
The two clubs in question are Liverpool and ManCity.
So the question is:
Do you sell him to one of them because he sucks anyway (Antony is better, works harder) and is a petulant little bastard (too big an ego, doesn't integrate into the team, doesn't apologise to the manager) so one of the rivals suffers too?
Or are you afraid that Klopp/Pep will somehow get to grips with him so that he is suddenly back in top form, so that you are prepared to take a major financial loss but wait until the summer to sell him at a lower price but not to Klopp/Pep?
Just out of curiosity, a question for the people who want to get rid of Sancho immediately in January, imagine the following:
Sancho's price is now around 35-40 million because the whole world knows that MU doesn't plan with him and wants to get rid of him at any price. In January, only 2 clubs show interest and are willing to buy him for that price. If Sancho is not sold to one of these two clubs, his price will drop to 20 million in the summer.
The two clubs in question are Liverpool and ManCity.
So the question is:
Do you sell him to one of them because he sucks anyway (Antony is better, works harder) and is a petulant little bastard (too big an ego, doesn't integrate into the team, doesn't apologise to the manager) so one of the rivals suffers too?
Or are you afraid that Klopp/Pep will somehow get to grips with him so that he is suddenly back in top form, so that you are prepared to take a major financial loss but wait until the summer to sell him at a lower price but not to Klopp/Pep?
I'm sorry guys but we won't agree here. It is just plain stupid to say something like this in such a situation. You don't take disagreements with your players to the public like this. Give a diplomatic answer, let the media speculate, criticize in private but stand in front of your team publicly. If he didn't see such a reaction coming, it makes it even worse because he seemingly completely misjudged just how frustrated one of his protegees was.
You sell him to the highest bidder and have done with the little petulant toss pot. You might as well imagine him riding off one a white unicorn while you’re at it because this lad doesn’t have the mentality to make it anywhere he’s accountable for his actions.Just out of curiosity, a question for the people who want to get rid of Sancho immediately in January, imagine the following:
Sancho's price is now around 35-40 million because the whole world knows that MU doesn't plan with him and wants to get rid of him at any price. In January, only 2 clubs show interest and are willing to buy him for that price. If Sancho is not sold to one of these two clubs, his price will drop to 20 million in the summer.
The two clubs in question are Liverpool and ManCity.
So the question is:
Do you sell him to one of them because he sucks anyway (Antony is better, works harder) and is a petulant little bastard (too big an ego, doesn't integrate into the team, doesn't apologise to the manager) so one of the rivals suffers too?
Or are you afraid that Klopp/Pep will somehow get to grips with him so that he is suddenly back in top form, so that you are prepared to take a major financial loss but wait until the summer to sell him at a lower price but not to Klopp/Pep?
I'd say Sancho is massively at fault. But he's not the only one at fault. Players having a cr@p attitude under ETH is becoming a problem. He seems to struggle to prevent players from downing tools when it gets tough.
Exactly. As if he walked into the perfect situation with the team brimming with the right characters. Klopp and Arteta had a similar thing during their rebuild, as any manager will. There's always going to be an awkward period with issues flaring up when you've got players from previous managers still knocking about having never made a strong claim to be a regular first teamer. It's what a squad rebuild typically entails. Find it incredible that people are using the Sancho situation as a stick to beat ten Hag with.Bizarre link there. These players have crap attitude - not because of Ten Hagg. We've craved a manager who set standards and takes no shit.
If the players want to down tools, despite being in the position they are in, then Ten Hagg magnifying that can only be a good thing. I do not want these players at our club.
Hmm.
What a strange hypothetical. Neither Pep or Klopp would go anywhere near Sancho right now.Just out of curiosity, a question for the people who want to get rid of Sancho immediately in January, imagine the following:
Sancho's price is now around 35-40 million because the whole world knows that MU doesn't plan with him and wants to get rid of him at any price. In January, only 2 clubs show interest and are willing to buy him for that price. If Sancho is not sold to one of these two clubs, his price will drop to 20 million in the summer.
The two clubs in question are Liverpool and ManCity.
So the question is:
Do you sell him to one of them because he sucks anyway (Antony is better, works harder) and is a petulant little bastard (too big an ego, doesn't integrate into the team, doesn't apologise to the manager) so one of the rivals suffers too?
Or are you afraid that Klopp/Pep will somehow get to grips with him so that he is suddenly back in top form, so that you are prepared to take a major financial loss but wait until the summer to sell him at a lower price but not to Klopp/Pep?
That literally makes it sounds worse "I'm hiding something about him". He gave an honest answer, made clear it wasn't a matter of discipline, and if Sancho doesn't hit send on the tweet it would be forgotten about by now. Probably started our last few games."I just want to talk about the players in the squad today."
Go back to Manchester. If Sancho has an issue, sit down with him Monday morning.
Simple.
I think it depends completely on the situation. Take the Rashford case for example. He was in top form full of confidence, in a position of strength, and his misconduct was a very factual one - you are either punctual or you are too late. There's no room for interpretation or disagreement. In this case, you have a player probably shot of confidence who is seemingly in disagreement with the manager's opinion on a subjective matter and just had to take a severe hit by not being nominated. One player was in the "alright, I behaved wrong and accept the consequences" mood while the other probably rather in a "give it a break, why always me?" one. Now of course that's also a mindset question and we all know which one is the "right one" but if you are in a leadership position, you should seek the blame with you and accept the characters that you're dealing with.
Pep sold him and didnt bid for him back from Dortmund, so they wont be after him. I doubt Liverpool will as well. So that scenario is ridiculous.Just out of curiosity, a question for the people who want to get rid of Sancho immediately in January, imagine the following:
Sancho's price is now around 35-40 million because the whole world knows that MU doesn't plan with him and wants to get rid of him at any price. In January, only 2 clubs show interest and are willing to buy him for that price. If Sancho is not sold to one of these two clubs, his price will drop to 20 million in the summer.
The two clubs in question are Liverpool and ManCity.
So the question is:
Do you sell him to one of them because he sucks anyway (Antony is better, works harder) and is a petulant little bastard (too big an ego, doesn't integrate into the team, doesn't apologise to the manager) so one of the rivals suffers too?
Or are you afraid that Klopp/Pep will somehow get to grips with him so that he is suddenly back in top form, so that you are prepared to take a major financial loss but wait until the summer to sell him at a lower price but not to Klopp/Pep?
They have the same mindset as Sancho and/or maybe haven't been in a managerial position. The Sancho-type are toxic to a team's productivity, morale and unity at work. They just want to coast with minimal effort and are usually a burden. When called out by a well-meaning manager to buck up after repeated cajoling / 1-on-1 sessions, they throw their toys out of the pram and try to convince team members to go against the manager. You can't win with this sort, you just have to kick them out of the team when possible.Some posters agenda against EtH is really showing in this thread how anyone could side with Sancho on this is beyond me.
So you’re unable to separate yourself from a guy you think is so much worse than you and then expect sympathy from anyone? C'mon
Someone of his supposed caliber would've been expected to outplay and outgraft those in the way of a starting spot instead of throwing in the towel and crying to the press...
Yes!Can the thread be renamed to "Sancho Vs. Sancho" ?
Who cares anyway? Sancho has been garbage for us. It’s not like we’re booting out Keane, Ruud or Beckham is it?A former Barcelona captain that had just had an impressive season with the young squad of the same club and had the backing of some of the most powerful and influential figures in the history of the club had no credit in the bank? And besides, he did not come out of the gate criticizing players in public as a young coach, which is what this is about, not merely shipping players out or adjusting formations. He won everything almost immediately, solidifying his position and influence at the club and in the dressing room. The rest is history.
Even if, as you say, "questions need to be answered", the issue here is whether this was the right time to answer in that kind of public manner with everything else already going on a the club. Despite suggestions to the contrary, he could have found a way to deflect, so what did ETH hope to accomplish by doing it at that moment? Motivate the player? Make an example to set standards for other players? Alienate a locker room cancer? Give the media fodder to try to distract from other ongoing issues at the club?
Part of being the United manger is having media literary, dealing with their BS and managing the enormous spotlight that is placed on the club, so hopefully he incorporates whatever lessons are to be had from this episode into his approach in the future.
That literally makes it sounds worse "I'm hiding something about him". He gave an honest answer, made clear it wasn't a matter of discipline, and if Sancho doesn't hit send on the tweet it would be forgotten about by now. Probably started our last few games.
What a strange hypothetical. Neither Pep or Klopp would go anywhere near Sancho right now.
Anyways, to answer your question yes I'd sell him to City or Liverpool or any club in the world. You can't build a squad based on "what ifs", that's how you end up with players such as Jones sticking around for years too long.
Who cares anyway? Sancho has been garbage for us. It’s not like we’re booting out Keane, Ruud or Beckham is it?
Sancho is a nobody compared to players who’ve been shown the door in the past. He is a non entity. Ship him out get a new attacker in. Easy decision.
what are you suggesting then?I mean, isn't that the point? If Sancho is such a supposedly nothing player, why even bother creating yet another headache over him with everything else going on? What of value was to be achieved for the betterment of the team overall in that moment?
Just deflect, move on and focus on the many other issues at the club. Even if Sancho hasn't performed on the pitch he is still capable of disrupting squad harmony, adding to scrutiny and adding more pressure in an already-tense environment.
If he is a non-entity as you say, then ETH's answer has contributed to making a non-entity an entity, judging by the length of this thread. The question here isn't even over the decision to ship Sancho out or not. If that is the desired course of action, you still have to manage it the right way.
what are you suggesting then?
- Lies about Sancho's training, just say he's ultra sick > Next day people see on Playstation Network, playing for the achievement "badges". So ETH'd put himself in position that he would be a proven liar? Consider to the fact that Sancho has mentality of 16 years old & unpredictable
- Sell in him Jan. His name was on market last summer, no suitor.
Do I have to remind everyone that Sancho started this himself? What are manager & club supposed to do? Kneel before his majesty, grand duke of fifaland, first of his name?
ETH could have just said that it was merely a tactical decision and emphasized the good qualities of players in the squad that he hoped to utilize to win the match, as opposed to shining a light on Jadon's deficiencies. It's still BS, but perhaps might have avoided all of the furor.
Edit: If it' true this happened right after a bust up between them, he could have even sprinkled in some more BS about "Jadon had a really good preseason blah blah, but we thought XYZ traits from XYZ player would give us the best chance this game." Then when he saw him later, be slightly rougher give him the "Look kid, I'm not out to get you, but I need to see XYZ from you, you little punk." Obviously, I don't know the whole dynamic between them and don't know what he's already tried with Jadon.