Erik Ten Hag: "I stand firm that I find it a disgrace the way Marc Overmars has been treated"

Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG-2074.jpg
:lol:
 
I daresay he has more knowledge of what happened than any of us, and is entitled to his opinion.

I want him gone anyway, for the record, but my feelings have nothing to do with this.
 
He was prepared to integrate him last summer

he’s a horrible judge of character or has questionable morals himself. I choose to believe the former.

not a great look either way for our great club
I think he just doesn’t give a shit about people’s personal life as long as they help him win football games.
 
Odious comments. I don't expect much better.
 
Overmars sent pictures and sexually explicit messages to female colleagues without consent. Even reported he verged on ‘stalking’ behaviour towards one particular colleague who wasn’t agreeing with his advances. He was then forced to resign. Ten Hag had a great working relationship with him and felt that his footballing merit should have kept him in the job. Someone who was their most successful ever sporting director should have been given some leeway.

In light of that, there doesn’t seem to be any way he should be publicly defending him as manager of Manchester United. As a private citizen, knock yourself out. But not as a representative of the club.
 
'Ten Hag out' scraping the bottom of the barrel now.

I don't think it's right to accuse those of wanting him out for this as scraping the bottom of the barrel. Supporting someone accused of what Overmars has done is very serious, and you have no idea what any of our fans wanting Ten Hag out for this have been through.
 
He's a likeable and classy guy, apparently.

Although these comments don't factor in to my opinion that he should be sacked. That is based on football reasons alone
 
I don't know the ins and outs of this situation however it is possible to think someone has acted inappropriately whilst also believing they've been disproportionately punished for it
Those things aren't mutually exclusive
 
I don't know the ins and outs of this situation however it is possible to think someone has acted inappropriately whilst also believing they've been disproportionately punished for it
Those things aren't mutually exclusive

Has ETH ever said that he thinks Overmars acted inappropriately, or just the latter part.
 
It's really not a good look but there are very few people in football with morals and it's become clear over his time here that he's kind of a dweeby guy who doesn't have much personality and seems solely focused on football. It's the same with the way he apparently wanted Greenwood back and wanted us to sign Arnautovic, of course I wish he was willing to make more of a moral stand on issues and not only be obsessed by results but that is who he is and he's in the majority within the game (a generally grubby business that has us hooked because of how much we love it).
 
Well, to him it's "football first".

Antony
Promes
Overmars
Don't be surprised if Ten Hag is willing to take Greenwood back.
He was willing to take Greenwood back last year per most accounts but the outrage from our fans made it impossible.
 
In light of that, there doesn’t seem to be any way he should be publicly defending him as manager of Manchester United. As a private citizen, knock yourself out. But not as a representative of the club.
Yeah that’s the thing. I think as many of said ETH just doesn’t care about people’s personality beyond the circle of football. If you’re a wanker in the dressing room and you don’t respect each other feck off. But if you are awful to normies who cares.
 
Is there any manager in the prem that has managed a player without questionable morals btw?

Arteta has Partey. Pep has copious cheaters. He played Mendy for a long time. Klopp supported Suarez. I think as long as these managers don’t take part in incriminating acts themselves, you can’t ask for much more.
 
Overmars sent pictures and sexually explicit messages to female colleagues without consent. Even reported he verged on ‘stalking’ behaviour towards one particular colleague who wasn’t agreeing with his advances. He was then forced to resign. Ten Hag had a great working relationship with him and felt that his footballing merit should have kept him in the job. Someone who was their most successful ever sporting director should have been given some leeway.

He might also be refering about how the sacking went. In most situations a club will give a very important person in their organisation a chance. They will do some kind of investigation and see how bad the situation is. Make the important person participate in training/therapy, donate to a good cause but in the end leave the important person in his position.

However at the time the news of Overmars his dickpics came out there was also a big scandal dominating the news. There was a big scandal going on about how in the TVshow 'The Voice of Holland' contestants had to deal with sexual inappropiate behaviour by important people from that show. People who could make or break the dreams of those contestants. It became a bit like how the #metoo movement was when Harvey Weinstein was accused. It just dominated everything at the time. I think because of that scandal that Ajax had to deal quickly and cut ties with Overmars. Without that scandal he might have been able to keep his job. In regard to how morally correct Ajax really is, Overmars does claim he has been asked by Ajax to come back twice since he left. They clearly didnt sack him as support for their female employees.

Personally i think Ajax was forced to do the right thing and had to sack him. ETH does only focus on the football part and not how things will affect the reputation off Ajax or the stock price of Ajax. He obviously thinks Overmars should have been allowed to stay.
 
Send nudes to a girl at the club without permission and was being a creep as well. His leaving the club is fair, I don't see a debate here.

Yikes that is pretty grim. :wenger:

Unfortunately, that kind of thing happens all the time in football though, why is everyone kicking off so badly about this over other ones?

High profile affairs and scandals have been going on for years. The likes of Walker, Terry, Lingard, Beckham, Ronaldo, Icardi, Giggs, Rooney, Ribery, Benzema, Ashley Cole, Oliver Kahn, Rosicky, Benjani, Rio Ferdinand.

Walker is actually really recent, an affair and a baby with his mistress, while his wife is at home with his children.
 
Yikes that is pretty grim. :wenger:

Unfortunately, that kind of thing happens all the time in football though, why is everyone kicking off so badly about this over other ones?

High profile affairs and scandals have been going on for years. The likes of Walker, Terry, Lingard, Beckham, Ronaldo, Icardi, Giggs, Rooney, Ribery, Benzema, Ashley Cole, Oliver Kahn, Rosicky, Benjani, Rio Ferdinand.

Walker is actually really recent, an affair and a baby with his mistress, while his wife is at home with his children.

This is worse than an affair. It’s sexual harassment.
 
Well, to him it's "football first".

Antony
Promes
Overmars
Don't be surprised if Ten Hag is willing to take Greenwood back.

He wanted to bring him back last year by all accounts but the backlash for supporters and media was too much for the club to persist with that decision. I don’t think we will try again this year as the reaction will be the same and it’s not something that the club will consider worth dealing with. I’m sure otherwise he would be back.
 
What did Overmars do?
What did Overmaars do?
Marc Overmars has abruptly quit as director of football at Dutch champions Ajax on Sunday after apologising for sending inappropriate messages to female colleagues.
Overmars, a renowned winger in his playing days for Ajax, Arsenal, Barcelona and the Netherlands, said he was “ashamed” after being confronted by the club in the last week about his behaviour.
“Unfortunately, I didn’t realise that I was crossing the line with this, but that was made clear to me in recent days,” he said in a statement. “I suddenly felt enormous pressure. I apologise. Certainly for someone in my position, this behaviour is unacceptable. I now see that too. But it is too late. I see no other option but to leave Ajax.”
The club said “a series of inappropriate messages sent to several female colleagues over an extended period of time” led to the decision. The conduct, described as “extremely painful for everyone” by supervisory board chair Leen Meijaard, will see Overmars leave with immediate effect.
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ter-quitting-ajax-over-inappropriate-messages
 
It was pretty widely reported he WAS willing to have Greenwood back (which is why we were going to bring him back until Arnold had to do the entire U turn when the fanbase revolted).

Which makes sense given the Hojlund signing. We seemed to be working last summer on the idea of having Greenwood available to dovetail with Hojlund.
 
Send nudes to a girl at the club without permission and was being a creep as well. His leaving the club is fair, I don't see a debate here.

Why didn't he just have Red Bull do the investigation? He could've been cleared and kept his job.
 
Is there - perhaps - a difference between Greenwood and ETH actions? Maybe a slight slight slight difference?
While I understand you do not need to jump through any more hoops and you have stated your opinion, the above response is off the mark, since the relevant comparison is not between Greenwood and ETH, but between posters defending Greenwood and ETH defending Overmars.
 
Is there any manager in the prem that has managed a player without questionable morals btw?

Arteta has Partey. Pep has copious cheaters. He played Mendy for a long time. Klopp supported Suarez. I think as long as these managers don’t take part in incriminating acts themselves, you can’t ask for much more.
I think in this case, it was long after it had been dealt with. ETH didn’t need to comment in public or if he did he could have said “Overmars is a friend of mine. He’s since taken his punishment, I see no reason to comment further”
 
Sticking up for his mate and what he believes in. I don’t agree with it but I don’t think it’s a massive issue in terms of being Ten Hag in or out. I’d understand more if he backed Greenwood, because if he can reintegrate him it makes his squad better, which is all that matters to a football manager whose job depends on results.

Something he gets to do as private citizen Erik Ten Hag, not as the voice of Manchester United.

Going this passionately in on a subject that is going to cause controversy at the best of times considering the public profile you hold is not good.
 
Is there - perhaps - a difference between Greenwood and ETH actions? Maybe a slight slight slight difference?

But I didn't compare Greenwood and Ten Hag.

I compared posters who defend Greenwood, and Ten Hag who defends Overmars. And that's pretty close, probably even worse considering he is Manchester United manager and people here are just average football fans whose opinion isn't that important and hardly anyone will read it anyway.
 
Yikes that is pretty grim. :wenger:

Unfortunately, that kind of thing happens all the time in football though, why is everyone kicking off so badly about this over other ones?

High profile affairs and scandals have been going on for years. The likes of Walker, Terry, Lingard, Beckham, Ronaldo, Icardi, Giggs, Rooney, Ribery, Benzema, Ashley Cole, Oliver Kahn, Rosicky, Benjani, Rio Ferdinand.

Walker is actually really recent, an affair and a baby with his mistress, while his wife is at home with his children.
What Overmars did was not a 2 way thing though, so it doesn’t equate to an affair.
he sent unsolicited pictures of his dick to female employees and rightly for the sack.
ETH should learn when to just zip that mouth of his
 
Is there any manager in the prem that has managed a player without questionable morals btw?

Arteta has Partey. Pep has copious cheaters. He played Mendy for a long time. Klopp supported Suarez. I think as long as these managers don’t take part in incriminating acts themselves, you can’t ask for much more.

So you would be fine now if he played Greenwood? Great stuff.
 
So you would be fine now if he played Greenwood? Great stuff.
What happens with Greenwood is a club decision though. If the club brought back Greenwood into the squad, the manager wouldn't unilaterally decide not to play him.
 
What happens with Greenwood is a club decision though. If the club brought back Greenwood into the squad, the manager wouldn't unilaterally decide not to play him.

I am just asking about Ten Hag in this case as I want to hear his opinion, because he spends lot of his time here insulting posters who have different opinion to his. Wumminator and many here would then support a manager of their club with same opinion as those posters then.
 
Is there any manager in the prem that has managed a player without questionable morals btw?

Arteta has Partey. Pep has copious cheaters. He played Mendy for a long time. Klopp supported Suarez. I think as long as these managers don’t take part in incriminating acts themselves, you can’t ask for much more.
Cheating and what Overmars did are very different. Mendy was also exonerated
 
Status
Not open for further replies.