VP89
Pogba's biggest fan
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 34,090
I see what you're saying, but even arguing we were second best to Southampton for 30 mins is over exaggerating the match.It's not supposed to be hyperbole, but I can't be bothered to go into detail over nuance of each game. Basically they held their own for the first 30 minutes, should have been ahead. Even the pundits were saying they were the better team for half an hour and nobody was denying it at the time. They missed a pen, we scored, and their heads went. They couldn't string passes together and were all over the place defensively. Basically getting everything wrong all of a sudden, that they had been doing well. I believe this has happened in a few of their games so far.
I've not seen enough of other teams with similar prospects to know how they're faring against teams at the bottom of the league. I attempted to answer by saying that I'd be surprised if many were second best for 30 minutes against Southampton. But also wouldn't be surprised if it happened vs palace, as I expect them to find form. I can't see how anybody struggles against a Palace team playing like they did against us though, they had no ambition and were miles off it. They only did OK because they kept their defensive shape well, but on the ball the likes of Wharton and Eze didn't play to their usual level. To have a whole half without creating much against a team with zero ambition in the game is poor.
And I gave you an example of Liverpool who really struggled for the first 45 mins to Ipswich away from home. Chelsea were completely outplayed by Bournemouth too. I don't think arsenal were great vs Tottenham, probably same against Wolves as we were vs Fulham, spurs sucked against Newcastle. And Newcastle have sucked every game this season apart from vs Spurs.
There's not a single team outside of City that hasn't surrendered periods of control to the opposition for 10-20 mins in games.
Last edited: