Not sure what is so hard to understand.
- top replacements only available in the summer
- giving 8 months to an interim is too high of a risk, what if he fails spectacularly within 2 months?
- as worrying as the situation is, theoretically easier upcoming fixtures which could see us turn the situation around
- sacking is expensive
Rather waste this season in order to get a top top relpacement, than give it now to someone who doesn't guarantee better outcome
Just a quick couple of points,
- Revenue, without revenue transfers are a moot point unless you sell and go for a rebuild, ouch! This team and its spending should be no where close to mentioning rebuild, however having 3 players 30 or older state otherwise.
- Currently 5 pts out of relegation zone, do I believe they will be relegated, no, however without placements in either Euro or CL marks another revenue hit hindering future transfer spending.
- Waste yet another season? Again, accessorial revenues drop as people start to spend money on other ventures or teams.
- Can they do any worse with a managerial change? I think that is the defining question. Even with yet another interim manager, it could spark the team for the short term and reality is, I for one think in this case change is an improvement.
- Progress, this team is not progressing, they are stagnant and in fact seem to be dwindling, what is going to change, how is it going to change, when is it going to change? We are 3 yrs into the ETH era, this team should be what he envisioned when he took the position and starting to have results.
The reality is that the current squad is a reflection of extremely poor hiring, Ed Woodward had no clue what he was doing. Having a bean counter run a sports team is like have a footballer running your finance dept or doing your income tax. In addition, not sure who was scouting and what the mandate was to those scouts, but at the end of the day they brought in names and not the quality of player required. I get you cannot go back, but there has to be some due diligence in forward movement and understanding what you want and who can get you there. Slot comes in and the transition from Klopp was seamless. This was the result of an organized operation. Slot my be still in the honeymoon stage, but heck, he has kept that team rolling and competing.
This team is not moving forward, at some point you have to recognize the errors made and make changes accordingly. I hear talk of Southgate, Potter and other potential managers incoming, again, is the board hiring names or do they have a clear vision on what Manchester United is, the history, the expectation and how to get to where you want to be? Once that is on the forefront, you want some pedigree, some history and you want to hire the right manager who can and has done the things to bring success to the plan. What is the time frame to come to a feasible conclusion, 1 wk, 1 mnth? If it is longer than that, then you have the wrong people in charge yet again.
My perception at this point, the board has no clue how to fix this. That is concerning.