Erik ten Hag | 2024/25 | Sacked

Erik ten Hag


  • Total voters
    2,943
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You could be here for a week and that would be enough for any competent person to realise that continuing with ETH is nothing short of self-sabotage.
You aren't nearly as informed or qualified as they are to make that conclusion to be fair.
 
The signing and constant playing of Wout Weghorst was the first horrific sign. Barely played a good game since February 2023.
 
This club is actually dead. It should just retire itself from the footballing side and announce itself as something else.
Give it to @horsechoker until the end of the season. Training sessions would be amazing.

"You want us to do what with it's neck?!"
 
We're all royally pissed, but yes maybe the fans who have been royally pissed off for over a year or longer are in an even worse state at this point. My honest opinion is there is absolutely nothing rational about this situation. Any ownership that comes into a club like United and even glances at the statistics, performances and results which led to us finishing 8th, and bottom of our CL group would not require wherever review/assessment they carried out. To then be pressured by fans after winning a domestic cup, against a side we are massive underdogs against, and would have won four out of five times had the final been played again, is just beyond incompetent.
But its important for owners to find the root cause of the problems. It's easy for us to say it's always going to be the manager. We might be right in many of these scenarios, but if you have well respected people with a lot more information to hand choosing for a different view, maybe they are evaluating the root cause to be elsewhere.
 
You aren't nearly as informed or qualified as they are to make that conclusion to be fair.
Yes but you can say the same thing about most fans compared to Woodward, Murtough & Arnold. Were they not informed and qualified? This argument doesn't make sense unfortunately.
 
The signing and constant playing of Wout Weghorst was the first horrific sign. Barely played a good game since February 2023.
Yeah we’ve never had such a prolonged period of shit. Near enough every game since March 2023 has been awful. Thousands of minutes of shit on a stick.
 
We're all royally pissed, but yes maybe the fans who have been royally pissed off for over a year or longer are in an even worse state at this point. My honest opinion is there is absolutely nothing rational about this situation. Any ownership that comes into a club like United and even glances at the statistics, performances and results which led to us finishing 8th, and bottom of our CL group would not require wherever review/assessment they carried out. To then be pressured by fans after winning a domestic cup, against a side we are massive underdogs against, and would have won four out of five times had the final been played again, is just beyond incompetent. This is before the fact that we've undergone multiple embarrassments this season and he's still surviving.
We played three finals (if you count the Shield) against Cheaty and were better in all of them.
 
What do we think will make the fans at OT properly turn?

They've been loyal, almost too loyal, so far but is there going to be a result that truly lights the touch paper?
 
Yes but you can say the same thing about most fans compared to Woodward, Murtough & Arnold. Were they not informed and qualified? This argument doesn't make sense unfortunately.
No you can't. Murtough, Woodward and Arnold are not remotely as qualified as Wilcox, Ashworth and Berada. These guys have big pedigree and a strong CV in their respective roles and are well respected in the industry.
 
What do we think will make the fans at OT properly turn?

They've been loyal, almost too loyal, so far but is there going to be a result that truly lights the touch paper?
When players look like they aren't making any effort and have hands on hips, the match going fans start to turn quite quickly.
 
No you can't. Murtough, Woodward and Arnold are not remotely as qualified as Wilcox, Ashworth and Berada. These guys have big pedigree and a strong CV in their respective roles and are well respected in the industry.
Yes but my point is that most fans aren't as informed or qualified as the people I mentioned were and yet anyone could tell they were terrible. So far, INEOS haven't really shown us enough for our unconditional trust. On the contrary, there have been more worrying signs than positive.
 
We played three finals (if you count the Shield) against Cheaty and were better in all of them.

Which is truly bizarre, considering how consistently pathetic we are on the pitch. Maybe it's like the performance raising Liverpool did against SAF's United.
 
Yes but my point is that most fans aren't as informed or qualified as the people I mentioned were and yet anyone could tell they were terrible. So far, INEOS haven't really shown us enough for our unconditional trust. On the contrary, there have been more worrying signs than positive.
I see what you mean, but it's one thing pointing to incompetence when the CEO can't even point to the Stretford End and its another when the decision makers are actually qualified in their roles.
 
We can’t honestly be thinking of keeping him a single more game surely? We can‘t be THAT badly run. We are already a meme club but this would take it to new heights
Watch this space when we are sitting there next Summer, all happy with 9th place finish that Erik has led us to on top of getting to League Cup final and only narrowly losing to Liverpool, reviewing Brobbey, Neres and Tagliafico signings.
 
But its important for owners to find the root cause of the problems. It's easy for us to say it's always going to be the manager. We might be right in many of these scenarios, but if you have well respected people with a lot more information to hand choosing for a different view, maybe they are evaluating the root cause to be elsewhere.

Where would that be? Do other big clubs evaluate everything else but the manger in charge of how the team go about approaching games of football before, and during games, or is there another elephant in the room they choose to evaluate instead. I personally can't see it, maybe we're just a unique club who does things differently...
 
I don't think its the same theme. I get you are royally pissed off at the situation but it appears as though you might be at a level where there is no rational thought behind keeping him that you'd respect the opinion of. That in itself might be a problem - and I don't really blame you for it because it's been poor for a prolonged period.

But from the eyes of INEOS they are trying to work out where the root cause of the issues are, and unlike us they see the trainings, they are close to the players and the coaching staff. They have appointed personnel with pedigree to do so. Could it be so implausible that the root of key problems we currently face is not managerial? Melissa Reddy has hinted strongly this to be the case, which would be consistent with the decision not to sack him if that's where their stance is.
Could simply be that INEOS are aware they haven’t brought him the right players and coaches and will need to have another two windows to address that. In the meantime we should not judge him. I think we will need to spend another £500m on players and replace coaches as well before we give that performance evaluation thing another go.
 
Where would that be? Do other big clubs evaluate everything else but the manger in charge of how the team go about approaching games of football before, and during games, or is there another elephant in the room they choose to evaluate instead. Maybe I'm wrong.
I think it's been leaked in part to Melissa Reddy as psychological problems being a factor.
 
I'm all for giving people time, especially new owners who need to evaluate things. But when you buy a business, walk through the front door, and see the manager shitting into his hands and smearing it on the meeting room flipcharts every hour, on the hour... Well, you shouldn't just shrug your shoulders six months later if he's still doing it.

And he can talk it up as much as he wants, tell you it's a process. That's great but I really don't want any process that involves shit, thanks.
 
Which is truly bizarre, considering how consistently pathetic we are on the pitch. Maybe it's like the performance raising Liverpool did against SAF's United.
Bizarre , inexplicable, frustrating, bonkers.
 
I'm all for giving people time, especially new owners who need to evaluate things. But when you buy a business, walk through the front door, and see the manager shitting into his hands and smearing it on the meeting room flipcharts every hour, on the hour... Well, you shouldn't just shrug your shoulders six months later if he's still doing it.
They need to blrlrlrlrlr him.
 
Which is truly bizarre, considering how consistently pathetic we are on the pitch. Maybe it's like the performance raising Liverpool did against SAF's United.
We weren't the better team in 2023. We had a few decent chances at the death. We were lucky to even get back into the game. A generous penalty was awarded to us.

We played well in the final in May. Rode our luck at times, but generally defended well. Clinical as well.

The Community Shield is a glorified friendly. Pep treats it as a fitness exercise. They had the likes of O'Reilly, McAtee and Bobb starting. They lost their previous 3 CS's in a row.
 
Athletic wrote that he was a leading voice in recruitment again this summer
Most tier one sources have had a deep dive I'm sure. None suggest he's spearheaded it, feel free to share your article and we can consider the other bits too.

But Yorro and Ugarte don't sound like Ten Hag pursuits and De Ligt was name dropped as an INEOS Suggestion (ironically). Zirkzee fits that Ashworth mould of young talent with high potential at decent value.

EDIT - pulled one article and it certainly wasn't Ten Hag spearheading it. For example Ugarte:

Ugarte was always at the top of United’s list of targets and had admirers in the club’s newly-formed recruitment structure, particularly technical director Jason Wilcox. Support for the signing was not initially unanimous, however. Ten Hag was cooler on Ugarte, partly because his arrival was always likely to necessitate the sale of Scott McTominay.
 
Surely the links he has with previous players have always suggested this was the case?

Maybe Yoro was a board decision but not many of them I would guess.
Yoro and Ugarte are two INEOS signings. I think I remember it was Berrada who was heavily involved in the Yoro deal.

The rest are up for debate. I think it's pretty obvious that Mazraoui and de Ligt are players ten Hag was happy to sign.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.