I was one of the people who wanted him to keep his job. The injuries last season were catastrophic, and a part of me wondered after beating City if maybe he can succeed with a fit squad and few new signings. But that was more of wishful thinking on my side. There's nothing wrong in Ineos giving him a chance, and also there's nothing wrong in realizing they made a mistake. Good leaders know when to cut their losses.I really don’t think that’s what had happened at all. The “new gang” took full control in the summer. I think from there most people said that there would be changes but the manager would get the chance to prove himself under the new footballing structure. I don’t think there was any suggestion that 8th was acceptable, not when Berrada is saying the objective is to win the title in 2028. Which is in 3 seasons.
Now do I think keeping ETH was a mistake? Yes, absolutely. I argued heavily for his removal, and was hugely disappointed and upset he remained in post. However, the reality is that there was an enormous amount of fan pressure to keep him because he had won a trophy, and be given the right to prove himself under a proper footballing structure and with backing in the summer.
This put Ineos in a lose-lose situation. If they sacked him, fans would’ve been up in arms; and if the new manager had a sticky start it would’ve unravelled quickly in terms of atmosphere. In the end they stuck with a manager that the majority of fans wanted - however ill informed those fans were and misdirected those petitions were - and we are where we are. I have no doubt they are regretting that decision now, but I do wish the fan base would take some accountability for this mess too. They applied enormous pressure to keep Erik, which was stupid, and now many of the same people (not saying you) have the gall to turn the finger on Ineos.
Everything I’ve seen about restructuring behind the scenes is extremely positive. The people brought in are best in class. This was never going to be a quick fix, and Ineos know that. I am certain they have a list of replacement candidates, many of whom have already been interviewed in advance. I’m looking at this and their success or failure over a 3-5 year window.
I still think he's a good man and a good coach, but ultimately the job of a manager is to get the maximum output from his players, and make sure they apply his ideas on the pitch, and he's unable to do that here.
From everything you hear about him, he strikes me as a Benitez kind of manager, someone who lacks charisma or leadership but knows a lot about football and has some good ideas. Top clubs require more than that, and I think that's why he can't get his message across. If you look at successful managers in recent history, the likes of Pep, Klopp or Ancelotti, they're all larger than life big charismatic personalities who command respect. United players are under a lot of pressure and they need a leader who can deal with that.