I couldn't do another month of this shit never mind another 2-3 years. I'd have to give up watching United in all honesty we've been that awful to watch.
Erik ten Hag | 2024/25 | Sacked
- Thread starter Cheimoon
- Start date
- Status
I couldn't do another month of this shit never mind another 2-3 years. I'd have to give up watching United in all honesty we've been that awful to watch.
Yep, I agree. I think that side would have taken to Jose and we would have just carried on winning.
Speaking personally, I would say I like a manager purely because he is a Manutd manager. Until it gets to a point where its hatred because he is rubbish.
It is also fan delusion, where you are hoping a manager turns it around and challenges and becomes successful.
Ten Hag started really well but over the last year he has pissed me off saying things like.. we play beautiful football and talking about cups. Talk about your league position and how often your team is embarassed/
The logic doesn't add up. We won trophies with poorer managers so the top guys would surely do better.
Also none of these people would say there's no point buying Rooney because Alan Smith failed would they? Why bother buying De Ligt when Lindelof and Maguire failed? Maybe we should have just kept De Gea forever too?
The logic doesn't add up and is never applied to other clubs either.
People generally say this when a manager is hard on his players and says the 'right things'. Nothing quite sparks excitement like a millionaire authoritarian telling other millionaires they're not working hard enough to justify their salary.
I mentioned earlier that appointing Jose instead of Moyes was the only opportunity to keep the standards up. Guardiola had to have his Barcelona team in place before he went to City, in the unlikely event of him coming here you can be fairly sure he would've fecked off pretty sharply when he discovered what he was working with. Ancelotti? possibly. Zidane and Enrique, I don't think they'd have been successful but, even if you do, you have to ask why they haven't accepted a job here.
We haven't been successful precisely because of the way the club has allowed the managers to run the football side of things (the managers are just as culpable). And then compunding that by choosing wildly different style managers in succession and then allowing them to rip squads apart and build their own. Only for them to buy another load of mediocre shite at the cost of hundreds of millions.
Stability should come from the top of the club down, a clear vision and style, with players of the right profile signed to suit that style and then managers plugged in and out when needed. That's how proper clubs are run, you don't throw all your eggs in one basket and totally rely on one man to do it all for you while also managing the first team.
Only Fergie could do that because he was a genius, we've still been using the Fergie model. So it's no wonder lesser managers can't succeed under the same structure.
Its total defeatism. People get like this whenever we need to sack a manager. They invested so much emotionally in wanting Ten Hag to work that now they're convinced there's absolutely nothing that can be done any more. It's either that or accept they're a shit judge of character and backed a shit manager, that level of reflection is too painful though.
I actually meant Fergie, but point still stands!
I am so surprised to see anyone back him after Sunday... No fan who supports the club and watches football can think that he is a manager worth backing. I mean he clearly cannot do the job and we need to sack him before the place gets toxic. Whenever a manager is fighting for his job after every 3rd game he needs to be sacked. Ten Hag has been living like this for a calendar year now. He blamed injuries last year, now he has nowhere to hide and it is showing. The fans will buy excuses but when it comes to an almost fully fit squad looking like sunday league team, it is an issue.
I wanted Conte over ten Hag, I've got no investment in him whatsoever.
Pep did not need his entire Barcelona staff, he won the league at Bayern without them, he would have done the same at City or United because he's a good coach, and if you offered Pep a billion quid to spend he'd go nowhere. You're rewriting narratives because we haven't won the league since Fergie left, if we had won a league title everyone would have been saying we were doing something right. This club is 'rotten' stuff is absolute bollocks. We've won every trophy except the CL and PL since Fergie retired.
Conte probably would have done a better job over the last 2 seasons to be fair, league wise anyway.
That's a bit revisionist. There's so many stories from managers, agents, reliable journalists criticising how the club has gone about its business for the last god knows how many years.
If you're at the point where you're saying he's got x amount of games to save his job, just sack him, he'd need a brain transplant in the mean time to turn things around. There just hasn't been any form of improvement throughout his tenure that suggests anything will improve over the next 100 games, let alone 2.
There’s more than a big enough sample size to make the judgement he’s done here and he’s peaked. It’s not unfair, it’s not knee jerk and it doesn’t make you a shite fan.
When it comes to signing players and squad building, yes there has. We've over paid, we've been naive, we've lost targets to rivals, all that is true, but we've still had the makings of a good squad at points, a top 4 squad at least and that's still true today. I keep hearing we need to clear the dead wood but there's practically 4 players around from when Jose was here, and those lads aren't exactly bad eggs and on social media/leaking news causing massive issues.
At the end of the day, the managers we've had in place either didn't have the experience or the ability to handle modern footballers and compete against the likes of Klopp and Pep.
Should be 4 W as it includes one Friendly defeat and not City cup final victory. But nevertheless sackable form
LVG got sacked after having 7 W in his last 10 games
Midfield I agree to a point but Mainoo I’d personally like to see as an attacking 8 - I’m not sure about him in a pair.
Forwards I think we’ve overrated the pace of our forwards for ages. Garnacho is fast without being rapid but he is quick with the ball versus most players, Rashford has lost his dynamite acceleration, Amad and Antony aren’t really that fast. Hojlund maybe could play the Solanke type role but he’s quite slow to get up to speed. Top speed is relatively irrelevant in football, assuming most quick players will max out around 34/35km, it’s all about how quick you are the first few metres.
People have watched washed-up managers and managers with relatively not much experience at this level win european trophies, domestic cups and finish second in the league - and their conclusion is "no one would have succeeded here"
It's comical. Mind that "2 trophies" was just recently used as justification to keep Ten Hag in place, just a few months ago.That is my point, we have seen enough to suggest there will be no improvement. He got grace last season due to injuries and this season there is no way he stayed unless we went on a winning run of 7/8 games. winning 2 PL games and we are in October is beyond crap.
His record in the last 20 games is beyond relegation fodder and if he is not sacked by end of this week, I fear he will leave us in the relegation zone by christmas.
People might think that is an overreaction but we got lucky at Southampton and Palace was a draw where any team could have won in the end. We are yet to beat a PL team convincingly since Ole was the manager.
You honestly can't be fecking serious? Does he have to relegate us before you think he might not be it? We're in 13th for God's sake!
I don't believe that anyone with eyes can still possibly believe this. The only way that happens is if everyone we face forfeits the game before we kick a ball.
As for alot of his players not being up to speed. Why is this and why are our players different to everyone else's? Or why do they look like they've just met each other?
I thought your idea was very plausible because half the time they look like they don't know wether they're coming or going but I think it's just his tactics.
Thanks. What a weird little man.
Funny guy, and can’t really argue against it, to be fair
Probably tie porto and lose to villa. They will then sack him over the break and put rvn in charge. Unless we get Tuchel or Potter, unlikely , Rvn in charge till the summer. I have no idea how that will go.
Thats my guess anyways.
Thats my guess anyways.
Funny guy, and can’t really argue against it, to be fair
Armie got jokes
I thought Glazers was bad. But the combination Ineos+Glazers are even worse.
Agree completely. The asshole side of me however says we bought Rooney just a month after Smith and in the month Smith was here and Rooney wasn’t Smith was killing it.
Because he's not doing anything wrong. It's everyone else's fault.
It requires a lot of hope, but then it also requires a lot of hope that the next manager will be any more successful. I was for Tuchel in the summer and I'd still be up for him, but not sure he's even an option.
I can't tell you why Zirkzee is shit against the good teams, but good against the lesser teams, but I would infer it's down to adapting to the league. Ugarte the same and that's in part to do with only getting him at the end of the window. Mazraoui and De ligt haven't had that problem, mind you. I can't tell you why Bruno, Rashford and Garnacho are poor though.
Good points. Ive been open minded about this approach for a while. We don't need someone in who's 'won things' we need someone in who can get the players buying into his philosphy. Doesn't need to be a big name.
This approach has made sense to me for a while. We are too quick to turn our noses up at names like Potter, Rodgers, De zerbi etc. We just need someone in who can get these guys playing ball.
There's nothing crybaby about what I said. They screwed up before due to changing their minds after 1 game and they've screwed up again by not immediately kicking him out the door.
I'm pretty sure the second the players know he's gone there'll be a collective sigh of relief.
Yeah I think Mainoo would be best in a possession-based 3 man midfield, not to say he couldn't do the role we're talking about. For example Christie was a number 10/wide player before Iraola repositioned him in the midfield so it's not like he's playing two poor technical players in there. Plus he does have licence to go forward sometimes so I feel Mainoo could do that role quite well.
Yeah I mean I understand “loving” how some of his Ajax teams played. But that’s about it, his football since coming here has been hilariously table, he’s unlikeable and arrogant as feck with the press, and in general doesn’t inspire at all to the point where I could see anyone “loving” him
This kind of goes back to the question, do you think the club should just give up hiring new managers? If there's no hope anyone else will be better, what's the point. Let ETH continue on for the next ten years.
Calling them worst dithers is crybaby nonsense. I’d much rather be where we are in terms of the current structure than the Glazers shit show.
Yeah I was very disappointed, despite Jackson describing atmosphere as calm they will be thinking how is he still here after Sunday
I mean you just have to read my next sentence to know I don't think that? It doesn't have to be binary, I can think Ten Hag can still be a success and think someone else can be as well. I think Tuchel would at least structure us better and has a bit of pedigree. Not sure he's a particularly long term choice though, if we were to gamble on someone, I would like Iraola. There is absolutely no guarantee on him being any better than Ten Hag though and it's a huge step up.
It can't be crybaby nonsense if it's true. I agree I'd sooner have both here than just the Glazers but that doesn't mean the new structure isn't dithering. It's happening right in front of your eyes!
I think Tuchel by the nature of his tactics would have us more solid, the question is do we want to chase potential short term success with him like we did with Jose, and that's not saying he will fail but that whether we win nothing or win something he will inevitably fall out with the management as his track record shows. Regarding Iraola, whilst he wouldn't be my first choice he is a manager with potential. I'm in the camp that just because EtH might have potentially failed it shouldn't deter us from looking at managers with potential. If the club has set a vision for how they want us to play then we shouldn't be afraid to go for a manager who we think has potential to get us playing that style. Very few managers are a guaranteed sure thing in football.
You are definitely in the minority then
- Status