Why did people assume he was poor on the ball anyways/ I keep reading people going on about how surprised he is good on the ball etc, where did this idea of him being poor on the ball came from?
or is it because he is like a tank and exhumes physicality and people automatically assumed he was going to be poor on the ball and one of those hoof the ball defenders? Or is it because people are used to Smalling or Jones, good at defending(at least Smalling still is, Jones?) but technically subpar and poor on the ball.