Berbaclass
Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
We're a big club mate. It's all relative.Man United pay FAR higher wages than Chelsea do.
We're a big club mate. It's all relative.Man United pay FAR higher wages than Chelsea do.
This was a Herculean effort on their part. And assuming there are no odd glitches at the end… getting this across was extremely impressive.
Correct. Spending all month negotiating to buy a player with a release clause for millions more than that clause. Genius.
Gone one better than us with FellainiCorrect. Spending all month negotiating to buy a player with a release clause for millions more than that clause. Genius.
You cant compare the biggest club in England and one of the biggest clubs in the world to Chelsea. Comon mate I know you are a Chelsea fan but you have to be realistic.Man United pay FAR higher wages than Chelsea do.
Man United pay FAR higher wages than Chelsea do.
I was talking about the amount spent per player. They managed to get a lot of players who would go straight into their first team. The average first team player for a team aiming to win trophies would cost what they spent. They are not inflating the market any more than it already is.Chelsea will have spent pretty much the same amount of money on players in 6 months than: Southampton FC, Aston Villa, AFC Bournemouth, Everton FC, Fulham, Brighton, Brentford, Crystal Palace and Leicester City combined.
I was talking about the amount spent per player. They managed to get a lot of players who would go straight into their first team. The average first team player for a team aiming to win trophies would cost what they spent. They are not inflating the market any more than it already is.
Chelsea has the money and wants to win. I won’t begrudge them for acting on their ambition.
If they were spending £130m - £150m+ on players and blowing up the market, I’d agree that it was distasteful.
The guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.Come on let’s not fib now. You have at least 3 players on or above the 300k per week mark.. and a huge squad.
What’s the relevance with Sanchez? Did I miss something?The guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.
We spent an estimated 35 million on Sanchez all in. 97k a week for 8.5 years is 42.5 Million. That's without the transfer fee of courseThe guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.
The guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.
Seriously, how do you come to a rival forum and argue against a blatant truth and expect people to have a healthy discussion? You fecking spent 600mThe guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.
I was talking about the amount spent per player. They managed to get a lot of players who would go straight into their first team. The average first team player for a team aiming to win trophies would cost what they spent. They are not inflating the market any more than it already is.
Chelsea has the money and wants to win. I won’t begrudge them for acting on their ambition.
If they were spending £130m - £150m+ on players and blowing up the market, I’d agree that it was distasteful.
The other part of this is why are these players agreeing to long contracts? They are locked into these low wages.Any reports on Enzo's wages?
He was a free transfer which is why he was on huge wages.
I bet Thiago Silva isn't on a cheap weekly wage for the same reason.
The other part of this is why are these players agreeing to long contracts? They are locked into these low wages.
£110k a week.
Do you believe there aren't clauses in those contracts where the wage won't increase?The guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.
The other part of this is why are these players agreeing to long contracts? They are locked into these low wages.
They're doing this by finding a loop hole in FFP regulations by offering horrendously long contracts.
It's honestly crazy that a club can spend 600m in one season, trying to defend their spending is just madness. When one club is spending the same amount as 9 others in the same league then something is fecked up.
I think I made a well reasoned argument. But envy is an emotion that clouds judgement. We are United fans. We should be the last to complain about a club spending 105 million pounds on a player.
There's a 0.5% chance that Mudryk and Fernandez's salaries don't get improved upon over the course of their contracts, assuming they do well. The duration obviously protects Chelsea, but they will want to be paid relative to their peers if they reach the top.The guys who are moaning about our salaries seem to think we've put the guys we've just signed to 8 year contracts on £400k a week. Mudryk's salary for the entirety of his 8 year contract will be just a little bit more than the 2 year salary you splashed out on Alexis Sanchez.
The club doesn’t have to budge though. They have zero leverage.They'll probably renegotiate the contract in two years or so for significantly more money.
Yet another United fan accusing other United fans of envy and jealousy. It's bizarre.I think I made a well reasoned argument. But envy is an emotion that clouds judgement. We are United fans. We should be the last to complain about a club spending 105 million pounds on a player.
£110k a week.
They've just spent more in 6 months by themselves than any other league outside of England has ever spent in a windowThey're doing this by finding a loop hole in FFP regulations by offering horrendously long contracts.
It's honestly crazy that a club can spend 600m in one season, trying to defend their spending is just madness. When one club is spending the same amount as 9 others in the same league then something is fecked up.
They don't have to, but it's not uncommon for clubs to improve terms as a show of good faith when a player has consistently stepped up. Before long their agents will be getting calls, the players start making noises and the cosmic ballet goes on.The club doesn’t have to budge though. They have zero leverage.
I think I made a well reasoned argument. But envy is an emotion that clouds judgement. We are United fans. We should be the last to complain about a club spending 105 million pounds on a player.
Really? Because he's dead old?
Koulibaly is on £295k a week?
Oof
We spent an estimated 35 million on Sanchez all in. 97k a week for 8.5 years is 42.5 Million. That's without the transfer fee of course
Correct, but to call it a "fluke" is misinformed at best.You've won 1 CL in the last decade,
Wait, people actually think Mudryk and Enzo will stay on the same salary for the entirety of their contract?
was exactly thinking the same thingWait, people actually think Mudryk and Enzo will stay on the same salary for the entirety of their contract?