English people who want England to fail

English nationalism is the most ugly and brutally violent form of nationalism. It spawned the most evil empire in this planets history. White suoremacy and global racism are today the inheritance of English nationalism and its imperialist expression and drive to murderous domination. The Nazi ideology admired and learned so much from English nationalism which is why the revered the Brutish ( meant to be Brutish, but I'll leave it as water apt) empire.
Many people are wary of this and rightfully so.

Found this quite funny.
 
A large part of the history lessons in German schools is about the Nazi era, its evils and how it came about. It's a different relationship with the past than the English seem to have.
Bingo. The difference is a lot of the English think fondly of their world dominance through the empire still, which will obviously be a problem for everyone else.
 
Never an obvious answer, but if you’ve read your history then you’ll see most historical empires are despicable and evil to our standard. However, for me personally, Nazi Germany is top, and all other comparisons fall short because of their conscious institutionalized industrial murder of several minority groups to such an extent, add in how large % of their population actively played a part and it’s hard to overlook.

The English/British imperialists are considered "the most evil people that have walked the surface of this world"..Genocidal Britain == Jeffrey Dahmer, ..
This is so not only because of their numerous genocides across the world (North America, Africa, Australia, India, Ireland) but also because of the huge numbers of the most shameless genocide apologists/genocide deniers they have right now.

Almost too many to mention. Killed or starved about 20% of Irish. "Inventor" of Concentration camps in Board War. Massive atrocities in India. Treatment of American soldiers and civilians in War for Independence. Many many more.

The mongals may have killed a lot of people in a short time, but the death toll for Britian during its enitre span is far greater.



The English have been murdering/torturing/starving Irish people since Oliver Cromwell to the 1798 Irish rebellion to the Great Famine aka Great Genocide to the Black&Tans to Dublin Monaghan bombings to killing civilians in Derry (google all of it).

They have murdered to extinction countless millions of Native Americans and indigenous Australians.

They have murdered/starved/tortured tens of millions of Indians from 1757 to 1947.

Also google Opium Wars, Batang Kali, Boer concentration camps etc.

Enfland also resorted to the use of concentration camps to defeat South Africa’s Boer population at the turn of the 20th century. 10% of the entire Boer population were killed in these camps, including 22,000 children, who were starved and beaten to death.

One England's most ruthless conquests, however, came in the 1800s, when Engl7shish colonists annihilated Tasmania’s indigenous population. They forced aborigine wives to carry the heads of their dead husbands around their necks.



Nokillingmoths "found this quite funny"

You find centuries of brutal English racist violence funny. The mass murder to the brink of extinction countless millions of Native Americans and indigenous Australians.
Really ?
Maybe you need to think about what is ideogically shaping your sense of humour.

P.s You can know your history and still support England. Learning one's history is the best way of making sure it is not repeated. If some of the thug tries who give England fans a bad name were actually taught the truth about the empire when they were school children then perhaps they wouldn't be so prone to aggressively acting out their desire for the return of English violent domination of the world.
 
Last edited:
I think people who bring past empires and wars into football for a reason to dislike a nation's football team are just searching for a place to direct their hate. If you go back through the years you'll be hard pressed to find a country that hasn't committed horrible actions. Especially when you're talking about the "bigger" countries. But I don't have much of a problem with that because there always has to be a villain, and England I suppose is an easy target there considering in our history we've pretty much fought everyone?

But when you're villainizing your own country for things like "booing other peoples national anthems", have a word with yourself. Go listen to the Italian Leagues and their monkey chants. Or even English fans being too arrogant (which we aren't it's mostly sarcastic), what about the French? They thought they were going to walk to the end of this tournament. Honestly you can go on and on but the spotlight always falls on England.
 
I'm non English and I don't want England to fail. It's time Premier League teams dominate the footballing world once more. I'm sick of seeing the domination of Barca and Madrid (Spain included). Mainly because they're cringy as feck. Holier than thou attitudes, photoshopping pictures to make their club look better and their presidents think every player want to join them and almost every player did want to join them circus. Don't want to see the likes of them dominating the footballing scene. La Decima La Decima my arse. Messi in un club my arse. And also considering we have our fair share of English players, them winning something will actually improve the mentality of the squad. It could only be beneficial to us because we're still lacking winners. I mean having Maguire the Greece criminal vs Maguire the Euro winner is already a big improvement in itself. Shaw the fatty bum-bum vs Shaw the Euro winning Mourinho destroyer is another one.
Preach!
I am very indifferent about England. However, I think a lot of it has to do with the following;

1) I see how it is hypocritical to want to see a player fail for 23 months in a row to only then reverse my attitude when they pull on an England shirt for a tournament.

2) International football is really not a very good level of football and it has way too little jeopardy. Qualifiers now are a procession, while the groups stages of the tournaments are similar with 24/48 teams in it.

3) English media is insufferable. One minute someone is great, then all of a sudden someone does something slightly wrong and they're a scumbag who deserves to be hounded/ostracised. Tbh, the ostracisation of individuals for doing something slightly wrong/uncouth is also why I cannot stand middle class people in general, who are very prone to doing this in general in England/UK, which leads me to my last point.

4) International tournaments result in me having to talk to people that don't know much about football, about football. This leads to nonesense about how some players are actually 'great', when everything I have seen from them fkr years shows that they're not, and/or how a manager like Southgate is a 'tactical genius'. I just cannot do the niceties of going along with something because enough people think it and empirical evidence shows otherwise.
1)every single country has to deal with this. Get a grip. Like saying Real and Barca fans can't support Spain or Milan/Juve/Inter/Roma fans cannot support Italy.
2)True
3) Not as bad as Italy or Spanish media. I'm sure the French are the same.
4) just watch games with your mates

Interesting. So, for curiosity's sake, who do you believe to be 'the most evil empire in this planet's history'? And why do you think whomever it is you have chosen, is that? What do you think it is that the British Empire didn't do to achieve this lofty title?
Never an obvious answer, but if you’ve read your history then you’ll see most historical empires are despicable and evil to our standard. However, for me personally, Nazi Germany is top, and all other comparisons fall short because of their conscious institutionalized industrial murder of several minority groups to such an extent, add in how large % of their population actively played a part and it’s hard to overlook.
well obviously none of us are history majors so most likely only know in depth our own countries history so just google it

UK usually makes top 2 in most lists :nervous:

https://www.thetoptens.com/brutal-empires-history/

https://discover.hubpages.com/education/10-Most-Evil-Empires-in-History
 
Never an obvious answer, but if you’ve read your history then you’ll see most historical empires are despicable and evil to our standard. However, for me personally, Nazi Germany is top, and all other comparisons fall short because of their conscious institutionalized industrial murder of several minority groups to such an extent, add in how large % of their population actively played a part and it’s hard to overlook.
You do have an idea of the length, breadth and depth of British genocide, thievery, subjugation, and systematic, ingenious methods of oppression - that are still in place to this day, and have the colonised fighting amongst themselves (divide and conquer) - administered expertly over literal centuries?

England/Britain get a lot of flack for the atrocities committed across continents because, well, they were the best at it - surely, it can be seen for what it is and why it'll never not be a talking point or buried when discussions like this come around?

Some people can divorce themselves from this past, or tell others to get over it or stop bringing it up, but others never will. I don't think there's a right or wrong answer to how it's moved on from, but it is an intrinsic link for some when England and the jingoism of some layers of its support are in the spotlight.

Rightly or wrongly 'normal folk' who just want to support their nation with a clean slate get dragged into the associative link to the bell-ends bellowing 2 world wars or god save the queen and meaning every word of it who don't ever want the past to be forgotten.

These threads will always have a segue where the past is brought up because it's very much current for a lot of people.
 
Preach!

1)every single country has to deal with this. Get a grip. Like saying Real and Barca fans can't support Spain or Milan/Juve/Inter/Roma fans cannot support Italy.
2)True
3) Not as bad as Italy or Spanish media. I'm sure the French are the same.
4) just watch games with your mates



well obviously none of us are history majors so most likely only know in depth our own countries history so just google it

UK usually makes top 2 in most lists :nervous:

https://www.thetoptens.com/brutal-empires-history/

https://discover.hubpages.com/education/10-Most-Evil-Empires-in-History
I actually am a history major.

@Fortitude @devilrua thanks for the lesson, but it’s not necessary, I’m aware and quite updated on all of it.

In my humble opinion though, premeditation and the actual goal of the acts commited during Holocaust is worse than anything for me, personally.

Just because you disagree don’t make it so. This bizarre trend of understanding history on today’s societal and cultural premisses are quite frankly counter-factual in essence, but never mind that. You’ve all the right to hold your own opinions.

Now, back on topic. Go England! (The football team, that is)
 
I actually am a history major.

@Fortitude @devilrua thanks for the lesson, but it’s not necessary, I’m aware and quite updated on all of it.

In my humble opinion though, premeditation and the actual goal of the acts commited during Holocaust is worse than anything for me, personally.

Just because you disagree don’t make it so. This bizarre trend of understanding history on today’s societal and cultural premisses are quite frankly counter-factual in essence, but never mind that. You’ve all the right to hold your own opinions.

Now, back on topic. Go England! (The football team, that is)
The bolded is interesting. So would you say you're displaying cognitive dissonance with that, or is it how you see things, taking in a full evaluation of what and how it was done? If I posted a play by play of the atrocities in full and graphic detail, I'd rightly be banned from the site.

Anyway, I'm not going to belabour this point or topic, suffice it to say what Ingerlund and all that comes with it elicits in some folks shouldn't be summarily dismissed, if of course, you care for that perspective.

The problem for England is they are rarely assessed purely as a football team - the caveats for the hate are many and varied and I think more of it [hate] is to do with everything but the team rather than anything we see in actual games.
 
The bolded is interesting. So would you say you're displaying cognitive dissonance with that, or is it how you see things, taking in a full evaluation of what and how it was done? If I posted a play by play of the atrocities in full and graphic detail, I'd rightly be banned from the site.

Anyway, I'm not going to belabour this point or topic, suffice it to say what Ingerlund and all that comes with it elicits in some folks shouldn't be summarily dismissed, if of course, you care for that perspective.

The problem for England is they are rarely assessed purely as a football team - the caveats for the hate are many and varied and I think more of it [hate] is to do with everything but the team rather than anything we see in actual games.
I did say it was my personal opinion, I don’t get why you would invoke cognitive dissonance, there isn’t any. I’ll explain why, what we are discussing i.e. which is worse is purely academical, there isn’t an answer other than the subjective one you choose to believe.

No, not dismissed, but refering back to the subjective mind, it’s hardly a valuable discussion worth having in this here particular thread or topic, don’t you agree? I never disagreed with the notion about the British Empire being an evil construct which laid a lot of the world’s population low. Coming in here in the dramatic absolute way that original poster did, well it just irks me, especially since it’s presented as actual fact.
 
I did say it was my personal opinion, I don’t get why you would invoke cognitive dissonance, there isn’t any. I’ll explain why, what we are discussing i.e. which is worse is purely academical, there isn’t an answer other than the subjective one you choose to believe.

No, not dismissed, but refering back to the subjective mind, it’s hardly a valuable discussion worth having in this here particular thread or topic, don’t you agree? I never disagreed with the notion about the British Empire being an evil construct which laid a lot of the world’s population low. Coming in here in the dramatic absolute way that original poster did, well it just irks me, especially since it’s presented as actual fact.
I typed out two full paragraphs before really processing the bolded and have decided to delete them and leave this where it is as I agree, it's not a topic for the footy forum.

I get where you're coming from, but I don't think one can ever be surprised by the turn these kind of threads can take.
 
I thought this post thread was named "English people who want England to Fail" to talk about footballing issues.

But from what I've read it's more like "Anybody who hate English is welcome to throw bs"

I'm Mexican, a lot of people here hate Spanish and Americans for the same reasons. The Mexicans that hate these nations misteriously ommit the fact that Mesoamerican Pre-Columbian civilizations enforced massive genocides, ritual killings, cannibalism, totalitarism and that the technology they created was Stone Age and useless... But it seems "conqueror's hate" and bias is the same everywhere.

BTW, I do think England had a very easy route to the final... They virtually were hosting nation and got refferee help to get to the final. Still, I don't care much about who wins.
 
The English/British imperialists are considered "the most evil people that have walked the surface of this world"..Genocidal Britain == Jeffrey Dahmer, ..
This is so not only because of their numerous genocides across the world (North America, Africa, Australia, India, Ireland) but also because of the huge numbers of the most shameless genocide apologists/genocide deniers they have right now.

Almost too many to mention. Killed or starved about 20% of Irish. "Inventor" of Concentration camps in Board War. Massive atrocities in India. Treatment of American soldiers and civilians in War for Independence. Many many more.

The mongals may have killed a lot of people in a short time, but the death toll for Britian during its enitre span is far greater.



The English have been murdering/torturing/starving Irish people since Oliver Cromwell to the 1798 Irish rebellion to the Great Famine aka Great Genocide to the Black&Tans to Dublin Monaghan bombings to killing civilians in Derry (google all of it).

They have murdered to extinction countless millions of Native Americans and indigenous Australians.

They have murdered/starved/tortured tens of millions of Indians from 1757 to 1947.

Also google Opium Wars, Batang Kali, Boer concentration camps etc.

Enfland also resorted to the use of concentration camps to defeat South Africa’s Boer population at the turn of the 20th century. 10% of the entire Boer population were killed in these camps, including 22,000 children, who were starved and beaten to death.

One England's most ruthless conquests, however, came in the 1800s, when Engl7shish colonists annihilated Tasmania’s indigenous population. They forced aborigine wives to carry the heads of their dead husbands around their necks.



Nokillingmoths "found this quite funny"

You find centuries of brutal English racist violence funny. The mass murder to the brink of extinction countless millions of Native Americans and indigenous Australians.
Really ?
Maybe you need to think about what is ideogically shaping your sense of humour.

P.s You can know your history and still support England. Learning one's history is the best way of making sure it is not repeated. If some of the thug tries who give England fans a bad name were actually taught the truth about the empire when they were school children then perhaps they wouldn't be so prone to aggressively acting out their desire for the return of English violent domination of the world.

Do you live in the UK? Are you saying these things as an explanation to why opposing fans hate England or is this your personal opinion?

If everyone took a view of wanting to hate nations for things that happened in the past nobody would get on. We could all sit here writing 10 paragraphs about Germany, Italy, USA and the atrocities those countries have done in the past.
 
Having read the thread-title i thought for a moment this was about boris johnson and the pandemic.
 
The UK is unique in that we are a union, in that union I don’t think it’s unfair to say England are the queen bee of the nest, we are the ones who hold it all together and in this union English people are the ones who can’t be patriotic as we have to bend over backwards for the union and have to be all politically correct for the union. The only time English people can be patriotic is times like this, so because of that ‘unionists’ ie:- people who are proud to be British but not English, hate that.

They hate St Georges crosses on cars and houses/hate people singing English songs and hate people being proud to be English, once England goes out, this stops so they are happy, these very same people will also no doubt be remainers and many remainers have now turned anti-Britain and hate patriotism in general.

The only major footballing nation who may be similar to the UK is Spain, the Catalan part of Spain are very anti-Spain and many wanting Spain to fail, also I might be wrong on this one, but is there a divide in Germany? A large part of Germany’s success in football is from West Germany, is that divide still there in a football sense in that eastern Germans refuse to say ‘we’ in Germany’s past success as West Germany?

As for everyone jumping in on England on this thread (largely Irish/Welsh/Scottish) I don’t blame you, it must be frustrating as we are neighbours, share an history, but you see England living like kings in a sense - A major footballing power, having the best league in world, all this money, all this investment in football, all these great players throughout the years and basically just having our scraps we don’t want, ie:- a Phil Bardsley or maybe even Patrick Bamford (who Ireland have got there eye on), I can see how that can be frustrating.

The only thing we haven't had is sucess at international level for a long time, this was the only thing they could taunt English people with, now we are in a final Sunday with a good chance of winning, they may not have anything anymore.
 
Last edited:
You associate the multicultural England national team whose manager has been a vocal advocate for equality & whose players take the knee before every game with the stereotypical little englanders (who, as bluntly as this sounds, are dying out)

You’re rooting for Italy, a county who still have monkey chanting at black players to this day.

ok, cool.

Funny you mention Southgate and Little Englanders in the same sentence...

“People have tried to invade us and we’ve had the courage to hold that back,” Southgate said. “You can’t hide that some of the energy in the stadium against Germany was because of that. I never mentioned that to the players, but I know that’s part of what that story was.”

Ridiculous comment from him. Not least of all given how much Germany has progressed as a nation since then.

That and of course it's just absolutely hilarious for an English guy to be talking about invasions.
 
Funny you mention Southgate and Little Englanders in the same sentence...



Ridiculous comment from him. Not least of all given how much Germany has progressed as a nation since then.

That and of course it's just absolutely hilarious for an English guy to be talking about invasions.

:lol: did he really say that? What a loon. It always amazes me that even top managers somehow managed to portray themselves as not very bright.

This thread overall is quite ridiculous though. The sooner international football is over the better,
 
Any situation where nationalistic fervor becomes a nuisance or is used to oppress people, you'll have people opposing it and will result in people not supporting or even hating the national sports teams, as nationalism is associated with it. This is not exclusive to England. America, India ..many countries where this trend can be seen.
 
Was interesting to read some of the comments in yesterday’s Guardian, where there were a few Liverpool supporters whining on about their dislike of England generally as illustrated here-

“We're not English here in Liverpool though. I would hate to be in a crowd of England fans, they only shout and sing to throw it in face of the losers they don't know how to support their team their shocking. No songs, national anthem is utter misery, horrible atmosphere knowing your probably sitting next to someone who wouldn't piss on you if you was on fire. This is England”.
 
The only major footballing nation who may be similar to the UK is Spain, the Catalan part of Spain are very anti-Spain and many wanting Spain to fail, also I might be wrong on this one, but is there a divide in Germany? A large part of Germany’s success in football is from West Germany, is that divide still there in a football sense in that eastern Germans refuse to say ‘we’ in Germany’s past success as West Germany?
Before reunification games between west and east were special for obvious reasons, first and foremost the cold-war. During 1974 worldcup in West Germany the DDR made sure only to let "good communist citizens" go watch the games, but in secret the West-German team with all its star-power was the real nationalteam even for East-Germans. In East Germany you could not simply pick what sport you wanted to become great at. If you were tall and athletic you were more likely to end up on the swimming team because olympic games were more important to communist countries and there are simply more medals to gain in swimming.
When we are talking about today we can see similar rifts in the public as the ones you are having but the nationalists in Germany, or more precise AFD-voters, don`t have the same numbers as brexiteers in your country and are way more direct in their racism towards our ethnically divers team so end up not supporting their country. So it`s a bit the other way round.
 
Last edited:
All Europe with Italy
europa.bandiere.italia.materazzi.1400x840.jpg
 
English nationalism is the most ugly and brutally violent form of nationalism. It spawned the most evil empire in this planets history. White suoremacy and global racism are today the inheritance of English nationalism and its imperialist expression and drive to murderous domination. The Nazi ideology admired and learned so much from English nationalism which is why the revered the Brutish ( meant to be Brutish, but I'll leave it as water apt) empire.
Many people are wary of this and rightfully so.

The thread was about supporting the football team.
 
Every England thread seems to come back to same thing, but this thread seems most relevant to post this in:

Anti and pro-English posting seems to follow 3 patterns and let's look at those and diagnose them:

Logical Fallacies
  • Manchester United is based in England, therefore you should support England (or at least not be against England)
  • Scotland, Wales England and Northern Ireland are in the United Kingdom, therefore if you are British you should support England
  • Only English citizens can support England
These are logical fallacies, which are easily disproven. Stating logical fallacies as truth in public is the playground of dotards and idiots, and will not serve you well in life, unless you are a politician.

Perspectivism and Absolute Perspectivism
  • From my perspective, supporting the England team means you must support the entire history of the British Empire good and bad and account for it
  • From my perspective, I equate the England football with hooligans and right-wing politics, and that means if you support them you must justify hooligans and right-wing politics
  • From my perspective, I equate supporting England with racism, so you must be racist if you support them
This is trash garbage philosophy, yet all too common in both politics and everyday life now unfortunately. Perspectivism is a bastard child outcome of deconstructionism and medieval religious faith-based thought, has an underlying logical fallacy underlying it, namely, "my truth should be your truth." If only the great philosophers of our time would come down from their ivory towers and take a blowtorch to this scourge upon humanity. The rejection of it is simple, as so eloquently stated in the Big Lebowski, "That's just, like, your opinion, man." When it comes to truth and your place as a collection of atoms in the universe, your opinion means f*ck all, as does your existence, unless mathematically or logically proven. You are not special. Unless you are a politician, apparently.

Relativism and Moral Relativism:
  • Maradona cheated in 1986, so it's okay Sterling took a dive
  • The Italians cheated, too, so it's okay if we cheat
  • All nations did bad things, so I can justify the sins of the British Empire
Ah yes, this line of idiots forget the age old adage: 2 wrongs don't make a right. The underlying logical fallacy of moral relativism is, "I justify supporting this action, which I know is wrong, because someone else committed a wrong". Relativism requires equivalency to be effective. When is it effective? "Hey mate, the pints at the last pub where £4.25, but here it's £4.50, and it's my round so let's call it even." The equivalence is a .25p differential, acceptable by all parties. When does relativism not work? Comparing the historical atrocities of empires or nations. There is no equivalence. Using relativism to justify one's moral or political outlook on the world is what Jean-Paul Sartre would call "bad faith" or a fundamental flaw in your existence. Unless you are a politician or leading an insurrection (or both), it's highly effective.

Reductionism:
  • If we sign a central defensive midfielder, we could win the league
  • If had a Director of Football, we would win the league
  • If the Glazers sold United, we'd be proper sorted
  • If we fire Ole, we'll win the league
  • If we start Grealish, we'll win on Sunday
  • Any other manager than Southgate, and we'll win it
Reductionism takes a complex problem, that requires a complex solution, and reduces it to a simple "silver bullet". Ever had an old drunk in pub lean over and say, "You what'd fix this country? Proper beatings, like my dad gave us when we didn't behave. That would sort this country right out." Yes, of course, beating our children will fix local and national deficits, our healthcare system, complex geo-political affairs, the complexities of trade negotiations, national defense, and rising inequality. Beating our children will sort that out, mate. Reductionism is the lowest form of cretinism, and allowing a paralytic drunk at the end of the bar during last call to influence your thinking. Reductionism also often appeals to prophecy, usually. If this most likely outcome doesn't happen, it was because you didn't adopt my simple solution to a complex solution. Appealing to prophecy is basically saying, "I bet this outcome is likely to happen, so I'll hedge my bet in it's favour, and when it happens, I can say, 'I told you so', because I can see the future'" These are dangerous, unstable, people. Again, it's highly effective if your ambitions are to be a politician.

My point...
Don't fall into these traps. Be better than this. Resist subscribing to these techniques. Don't engage in logical fallacies, perspectivism, relativism, reductionism, or prophesy.

Your whole life will be better for it.

That said...

It's coming lads!!! It's coming home!!!!!
Fascinating and interesting post. I really like the tone of your post that is well written.

"From my perspective", Watching a football game is not a complex activity and should not require an overly sophisticated underlying rationale.

If I watch a game, there are 3 main possibilities:
(1) I don't care about the outcome
(2) I want this team to win
(3) I want this team to lose

If I support a country, the main reasons can be:
(A) I like these players or some players in particular (because they are stylish or play for Manchester United etc....)..or the style of play
(B) I like the country and want my fellow citizens to be happy: shared pleasure...

If an English doesn't want his not to win, the justifications can be:
(A) I don't like the players, the coach or style of play etc.
(B) I don't like nationalism, the pride of being a citizen of a specific country
(C) I don't like football, or English football fans or the noise associated with any win in a big tournament, etc..

Reductionism is not necessarily an appropriate concept in the examples you described. I may believe that Manchester United will finish 2nd or 3rd next season....but if they recruit haaland and mbappe, then I may want to believe the club would be champions. Generally speaking, you know that details can make the difference in some activities.

Same applies to relativism. Some believe cheating is part of the game and will be happy to share some examples or say it is generalised.

I have an issue with History in the sense that a lot of atrocities was perpetuated by people who are now dead. Why should I feel sorry because the bad things done by some people two Centuries ago??

Anyway you made an interesting post I wanted to comment :)
 
Utd 1st England 2nd, always has and always will be. For people that weren't old enough or don't remember utd players use to get a lot of abuse from so-called England fans in the 90s and 2000s
 
For me there isnt conflict between Club and Country.

Not like there was in the late 90's.
 
The UK is unique in that we are a union, in that union I don’t think it’s unfair to say England are the queen bee of the nest, we are the ones who hold it all together and in this union English people are the ones who can’t be patriotic as we have to bend over backwards for the union and have to be all politically correct for the union. The only time English people can be patriotic is times like this, so because of that ‘unionists’ ie:- people who are proud to be British but not English, hate that.

They hate St Georges crosses on cars and houses/hate people singing English songs and hate people being proud to be English, once England goes out, this stops so they are happy, these very same people will also no doubt be remainers and many remainers have now turned anti-Britain and hate patriotism in general.

The only major footballing nation who may be similar to the UK is Spain, the Catalan part of Spain are very anti-Spain and many wanting Spain to fail, also I might be wrong on this one, but is there a divide in Germany? A large part of Germany’s success in football is from West Germany, is that divide still there in a football sense in that eastern Germans refuse to say ‘we’ in Germany’s past success as West Germany?

As for everyone jumping in on England on this thread (largely Irish/Welsh/Scottish) I don’t blame you, it must be frustrating as we are neighbours, share an history, but you see England living like kings in a sense - A major footballing power, having the best league in world, all this money, all this investment in football, all these great players throughout the years and basically just having our scraps we don’t want, ie:- a Phil Bardsley or maybe even Patrick Bamford (who Ireland have got there eye on), I can see how that can be frustrating.

The only thing we haven't had is sucess at international level for a long time, this was the only thing they could taunt English people with, now we are in a final Sunday with a good chance of winning, they may not have anything anymore.
Every one of this guy’s posts are comedy gold feck me :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
To be honest, I found myself in a weird position.
I really like the players in this English team(bar a few from our rivals), especially our own, but I found myself disliking the team when I watched them play.
Nothing to do with them, though and all to do with Southgate.
It seems such a waste to have that much attacking talent and use it to the bare minimum.

It feels also Jose-esque how dislikeable they became as a team because of their style.

So I found myself watching the entire event as a neutral. Which was refreshing.
Supporting United last season had taken a toll on me.
 
@Cascarino

Most of that post was from an Englisman displaying his pride in his country's achievements. The rest was banter, as is generally the case between England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland. I tend to disregard posts from those of British nationality for that very reason. We're always having a pop at one another, but it's light-hearted banter for the most part.

But the other nations getting their oar in I don't understand at all. Like the Germans, for example. They have a strong hooligan element of their own to contend with, as do the Russians, France, Turkey and plenty of others. Like I said the other day, hooliganism is a widespread issue, not unique to England. Not by any stretch of the imagination. So what's with their hate for England?