Dan_F
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2012
- Messages
- 11,329
50 partnership
Come on man, why would you say it out loud!
Last edited:
50 partnership
Yep, burns has been our biggest plus of the series for me.I think Burns has had an excellent series, especially when compared to the returns of literally everyone else at the top of the order.
Think he's got better as the series has gone on, too, even if his hundred was early.
Yeah what does Warne know about spin bowling eh?Warne is awful. He's just said Lyon should have brought the field in and stopped Denly getting an easy single and challenged him to come down the pitch to him even though Denly has hit Lyon down the ground for 3 boundaries doing exactly that. Something about match awareness according to Warne.
Yep, from the Aus perspective, their tail end has looked far more assured than most of their top order as wellJack Leach honestly looks to have a better and more secure defence than every other batsmen bar those you just mentioned.
It's been shocking.
Yeah he’s been possibly their most consistent performer with the bat I’d say?I think Burns has had an excellent series, especially when compared to the returns of literally everyone else at the top of the order.
Think he's got better as the series has gone on, too, even if his hundred was early.
3 2nd Innings 50’s in a row for Denly. Really needs to convert this half century. Test career on the line?
Nah I think his career is safe for now. Getting 50s against this quality of bowling attack isn’t easy and England openers in recent times have been shocking.
Yeah what does Warne know about spin bowling eh?
He's probably safe for now, as you say. I just don’t think he’s the answer long term, to open though. Although I’m struggling to think who would replace him atm.
Yeah, I think he's done enough. I still don't think he's particularly good (I haven't watched today but his 50s were both pretty chancy), but it's abundantly clear he's got a big heart and can scrap it out with the best of them. That's probably more valuable to this England team right now than anything else.
Keep him at 3, bump Root down to 4.
Bairstow needs to feck off the useless prick
Yep.Keep him at 3, bump Root down to 4.
Yeah he's an outstanding slip fielder isn't he. Not surprising given how good his reflexes are.What a catch.
Yep.
Wouldn't mind seeing something like this for the NZ series:
Burns, Sibley, Denly, Root, Stokes, Pope, Buttler (wk), Moeen, Archer, Broad, Stone
Glimmer of hope for Australia?
Tough chase but with Smith, anything’s possible.
Yep.
Wouldn't mind seeing something like this for the NZ series:
Burns, Sibley, Denly, Root, Stokes, Pope, Buttler (wk), Moeen, Archer, Broad, Stone
Surely Curran should be in with a shout, he's looked pretty good.
Yeah he's a dangerous bowler when it's swinging but he can look innocuous can't he. Still feel like his best route into the team is as a top 6 batsman who bowls.Surely Curran should be in with a shout, he's looked pretty good.
More chance of making the 230 to overtake Bradman’s record!Agreed, 380 should really be enough. Re Smith, His 80 in the first innings was his lowest score of the series, surely he is due a duck!
By all accounts Wade is a massive sledger, so that's no surprise.By all accounts Warner and Wade spent most of the day sledging.
Now if it was Smith or Labuschagne or Cummins doing the sledging I'd understand it because they all have the numbers to back it up.
But for Wade and especially Warner to be giving it large is hilarious. Warner is on course for the worst ever stats for an opener in a series in Test history for feck sake. What can he possibly be having a go at anyone else for?
Calm down mate.Bairstow needs to feck off the useless prick
Right, how many do we think Leach, Archer and Broad can add to the score?
Is getting the lead past 400 important?
In reply Australia will probably lose 2 early wickets, then ML & Smith will bat out most of the day, England will take late wickets to swing the game back in their favour. Smith will still be at the crease.