Samid
He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
That's that then. See you for the deciding test next week!
They will get some time on Sunday. Believe.It’s sad if rains prevent this result because from selection to performance this is an incredible Aussie meltdown
Let's hope we get some play over the weekend, else the decision to keep batting will look a bit silly.
Why on earth are people obsessed with a fictional run chase when 10 wickets is absolutely required. You're basically saying "we should risk not giving ourselves enough time to take 10 wickets in order to avoid possibly having to chase". I'm sorry, but makes no sense.That decision can't look silly because chasing any kind of target on a tricky day 5 pitch is close to impossible.
Why on earth are people obsessed with a fictional run chase when 10 wickets is absolutely required. You're basically saying "we should risk not giving ourselves enough time to take 10 wickets in order to avoid possibly having to chase". I'm sorry, but makes no sense.
Until this knock he's been crap.
Let's hope we get some play over the weekend, else the decision to keep batting will look a bit silly.
in anyone’s wet dream, we batted on an hour too long. the conditions weren’t there this morning to declare only 70 odd ahead. and i
don’t think we’d have got them all out with an extra hour today. any more time and they’d be ahead and potentially only a couple down. after crawley and root, the aussies were only able to save the test after getting rolled for 300, unless we let them back in. scoreboard pressure got to them today, and mentally they looked shot after going around the park.
with them batting to number 10, it’s not a 300 deck. australia could, and should, have batted england out of the series on day one. it’s not a three day test pitch. england could have got way more if they weren’t in such a hurry to score, brooks, stokes, bairstow all left runs out there.
I love how we’ve all normalised England scoring 592 runs in basically 4 sessions worth of cricket.
We finished day two 70 ahead, and that was with Brook and Stokes batting fairly averagely. I’m pretty sure Brook was 10 from 40 at one point. It was completely in our grasp to accelerate last night, at the risk of losing wickets. We could have finished last night 100 ahead at worst.in anyone’s wet dream, we batted on an hour too long. the conditions weren’t there this morning to declare only 70 odd ahead. and i don’t think we’d have got them all out with an extra hour today. any more time and they’d be ahead and potentially only a couple down. after crawley and root, the aussies were only able to save the test after getting rolled for 300, unless we let them back in. scoreboard pressure got to them today, and mentally they looked shot after going around the park.
with them batting to number 10, it’s not a 300 deck. australia could, and should, have batted england out of the series on day one. it’s not a three day test pitch. england could have got way more if they weren’t in such a hurry to score, brooks, stokes, bairstow all left runs out there.
I love how we’ve all normalised England scoring 592 runs in basically 4 sessions worth of cricket.
Should be noted despite any criticism that Stokes might have got about the declaration, no other side in the world would have managed to have had a chance to win this game given the pitch and the rain.
If it rains all weekend and we can’t take 10 wickets now, there definitely is a right answer mateCompletely agree. Superb Cricket from England, we are arguing over tactical opinions - no right answer
in anyone’s wet dream, we batted on an hour too long. the conditions weren’t there this morning to declare only 70 odd ahead. and i don’t think we’d have got them all out with an extra hour today. any more time and they’d be ahead and potentially only a couple down. after crawley and root, the aussies were only able to save the test after getting rolled for 300, unless we let them back in. scoreboard pressure got to them today, and mentally they looked shot after going around the park.
with them batting to number 10, it’s not a 300 deck. australia could, and should, have batted england out of the series on day one. it’s not a three day test pitch. england could have got way more if they weren’t in such a hurry to score, brooks, stokes, bairstow all left runs out there.
Completely agree with all of this.
Whichever side you’re on to be honest, the deciding factor is always going to be whether more play is possible this weekend or not. If we’d declared earlier today I’m personally not sure we’d have much more to show for it, and there was value in putting them through the ringer for a bit longer and putting a really crushing lead on the board.
If it rains all weekend and we can’t take 10 wickets now, there definitely is a right answer mate
If it rains all weekend and we can’t take 10 wickets now, there definitely is a right answer mate
I don’t agree. The aggressive option is giving yourself more time to take the 10 wickets and backing yourself to chase whatever is left if needed. Stokes was more aggressive on day one of the ashes, and I fully backed that declaration, I thought it was brilliant but didn’t come off.I think you can only nitpick if England fall 1-2 wickets short, not 6 which your scenario suggests. As much as Bazball brings all of our batshit schemes to fruition, I don’t think it’s realistic to expect England to score 450-500 and knock over Australia twice for less than that in what is technically 8 full sessions of cricket (27 overs lost to over rates). A pitch that enables you to bat once isn’t going to enable you to roll over a side that’s packed their batting so easily.
You wouldn’t have wanted an extra 20 overs to bowl at them tonight? No value in that?
I don’t agree. The aggressive option is giving yourself more time to take the 10 wickets and backing yourself to chase whatever is left if needed. Stokes was more aggressive on day one of the ashes, and I fully backed that declaration, I thought it was brilliant but didn’t come off.
England have allowed the weather to decide to the result. They could have won the test today if they went aggressive. England didn’t need those extra 150 runs, they needed another 40 overs to bowl Australia out and then use whatever is left to chase.
England have allowed the weather to decide to the result. They could have won the test today if they went aggressive. England didn’t need those extra 150 runs, they needed another 40 overs to bowl Australia out and then use whatever is left to chase.
Ok let’s entertain this. Australia already have 430 runs on this pitch, let’s say England had another 30 overs at them and knocked them over for another 100 runs. You think England could have made 531 in 77 overs?