Abraxas
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2021
- Messages
- 6,313
Bairstow has always been leaden footed behind the stumps. He's never a frontline keeper. Can be costly at times.
Will Archer ever play test cricket again? Such a loss.
Think it is more this! Even if he is in form with the bat, fine, but just have Foakes as WK and Bairstow as a batsman...
I think Jofra gets a bit overrated at times.
I think if both Wood and Archer had have been available it would have been more prudent to rotate them to try and give them the best chance of finishing a series. Plus not risk one breaking down mid game. That's too high a likelihood with both included.
Agreed he had express pace but his line and length was far from being a top bowler.I think Jofra gets a bit overrated at times.
I think if both Wood and Archer had have been available it would have been more prudent to rotate them to try and give them the best chance of finishing a series. Plus not risk one breaking down mid game. That's too high a likelihood with both included.
Agreed he had express pace but his line and length was far from being a top bowler.
Sometimes he didn't find the rhythm to hit top pace either. Or maybe holding it back due to injuries and fitness.Agreed he had express pace but his line and length was far from being a top bowler.
Looks like I missed some good cricket, typical, caught Smiths wicket though, big one. Woods is a fecking beast, we win the first test with him playing.
Sometimes he didn't find the rhythm to hit top pace either. Or maybe holding it back due to injuries and fitness.
I'd say he had incredible attributes. Natural. The ease at which he did things was unbelievable. But it is still mostly potential. Can't really say he would have ripped through the Aussies consistently but it would have been a good option.
Especially when you consider he started late because he had to wait all that time to become eligible.Monumental loss especially with the likes of Stone & Mahmood who can't stay fit either
These drops and missed stumpings are costing us in this series.
It's not like there difficult chances either. The Bairstow second one and the Root one are just routine, straight-forward catches.
Why hasn't Marsh been around the test side for so long? Looks good
Why hasn't Marsh been around the test side for so long? Looks good
Probably you're thinking of it more like baseball. It's not just about making them miss the ball in cricket. There are numerous dismissals and they can all be planned for. Including the batsman hitting it at a fielder, who after all has been placed there for a reason. It's all the same result - out. Kinda like a footballer wheeling away after scoring from 2 yards really.I'm not a regular cricket watcher, just the ashes and the odd 20/20 game here and there.
Why do the bowlers get all the credit for a catch? They can't be that good at bowling it if the batter hit it. Yet some guy pulls off some diving catch, and the bowler wheels away like he's won the world cup.
It's more like the person who assisted the goal with a 2 yard sideways pass getting the plaudits rather the guy who belted it top corner from 35 yards.Probably you're thinking of it more like baseball. It's not just about making them miss the ball in cricket. There are numerous dismissals and they can all be planned for. Including the batsman hitting it at a fielder, who after all has been placed there for a reason. It's all the same result - out. Kinda like a footballer wheeling away after scoring from 2 yards really.
What on earth is going on with the catching this series? It feels too casual. Do they even practice this?
I'm not a regular cricket watcher, just the ashes and the odd 20/20 game here and there.
Why do the bowlers get all the credit for a catch? They can't be that good at bowling it if the batter hit it. Yet some guy pulls off some diving catch, and the bowler wheels away like he's won the world cup.
I'm not a regular cricket watcher, just the ashes and the odd 20/20 game here and there.
Why do the bowlers get all the credit for a catch? They can't be that good at bowling it if the batter hit it. Yet some guy pulls off some diving catch, and the bowler wheels away like he's won the world cup.
I'm not a regular cricket watcher, just the ashes and the odd 20/20 game here and there.
Why do the bowlers get all the credit for a catch? They can't be that good at bowling it if the batter hit it. Yet some guy pulls off some diving catch, and the bowler wheels away like he's won the world cup.
True, if it's a bad ball and the fielder takes a wonder catch. Most of the time they're not. Most of the time it's bowling to a plan and a regulation, ordinary catch. Not much to credit a fielder for there.It's more like the person who assisted the goal with a 2 yard sideways pass getting the plaudits rather the guy who belted it top corner from 35 yards.
And if the batters were any good, they'd just hit it away from the fielders.
Mitch marsh looks ginormous