Boycott
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2013
- Messages
- 6,331
The strangest Ashes series I've seen.
NO!!!! that will probably mean more Shane Warne on channel 9. He's a fecking boofhead bogan on channel 9.So BT have just signed a deal to secure all Aussie him matches including the next Ashes series.
fecking joke, I can't stand BT. Give me Sky's 'bad for consumer' monopoly every day, it was far cheaper.
Oops, my bad I thought they announced the squad but it was the ODI/T20 squad. For the record, that is the first time I've seen Siddle bowl genuine swing on a good length for a long time. He was only good for getting Pieterson out down here in the last series.Why can't Siddle go to Bangladesh? That's Warne opinion, even if Siddle doesn't go to Bangladesh it doesn't mean Siddle should be cast by the wayside, he has plenty of years in him and I think it's a poor message to send to Siddle to have clog around all series and then not play him at all. Warne pretty much said he doesn't think Siddle will ever play again, which on the evidence of this test is pretty stupid.
So BT have just signed a deal to secure all Aussie home matches including the next Ashes series.
fecking joke, I can't stand BT. Give me Sky's 'bad for consumer' monopoly every day, it was far cheaper.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cr...-Pakistan-as-battle-with-Sky-intensifies.html
Wish that BT would feck off already. They've already ruined Saturday lunchtime and CL, leave the cricket alone ffs.
Topley's one of the weirdest England sections since Gurney I reckon.
Desperately seeking a left-arm quick I think, very en vogue especially in white ball cricket.
Isn't Willey already in the team?
I've seen a fair amount of Topley for Essex. He's got good variations (as does pretty much every young bowler in the country scene at the minute) and decent control so I think they see him as a death option. I just don't think he's quick enough, nor skilful enough yet.
Still can't believe we didn't take Stokes to the World Cup
He didn't deserve to go.
I'm sure they'd loved to have taken him, but the Ben Stokes we are talking about was going for 10 an over and could barely get a run. He didn't earn his spot.
I'd still have Stokes in ahead of Bopara, my memory is a bit sketchy mind. He had a shocking tour of Sri Lanka after not doing too great vs. India yes? But after the World Cup was done he got a chance in the West Indies and then Fabrarce stuck him up the order vs. New Zealand in May and he scored a 100? Stokes strikes me as a someone who thrives under responsibility and under Moores he wasn't given any. I mean before today Stokes had only bowled 11 overs in 8 T20I's.
Perfectly fair call.