Regulus Arcturus Black
Full Member
Foden has been shit, utter shit. Sterling just slightly better.
Apparently this opinion means you think Sterling has been “good” or something.
Foden has been shit, utter shit. Sterling just slightly better.
Southgate mentioned him as one of the young players lacking a bit of tournament experience so he's helping him out by just not playing him, whilst playing other players who lack tournament experience....Maybe Sancho isn't getting the job done in training?
Only thing I can think of.
Also, why play a double pivot?
The double pivot gets unfairly maligned, imo.Maybe Sancho isn't getting the job done in training?
Only thing I can think of.
Also, why play a double pivot?
Foden hasn’t been great either but sterling has been by far the worst of the two.I judged Foden with my eyes, and he was shite, posed zero threat. I checked the stats to see if that backed my up, it did.
Saka is an alright start — it’s just one step forward two steps back with keeping some of the other massive underperformers still in there.While I understand all the complaints,
I do think Saka is going to do well.
Foden hasn’t been great either but sterling has been by far the worst of the two.
It’s a low bar though …………
Kane is lucky to start as well in my opinion.Opinions I guess, I think an attacker having 3-4 attacking moments and a game winning goal are worth more than his opposite flank having a single shot and doing feck all else.
Each to their own though.
As I said earlier, I’d have dropped all 3 attackers.
No, it’s proves he’s done more than Foden who’s been fexking terrible. I don’t think any of the forwards have been “good”. Kane and Foden have been the worst though, offered absolutely nothing.
I’d have dropped all 3.
Same negativity before the last two games were justified to be fair.Doesn’t really matter what the team is… this thread is a car crash of negativity before a ball has even been kicked.
It wasn’t THAT funnyNot a single poster is claiming Sterling’s been good, do keep laughing.
Just an addendum to this:The double pivot gets unfairly maligned, imo.
Liverpool won a PL and a CL with three water carriers in midfield. Every good team needs defensive solidity from somewhere in order to balance the attack.
Like I say, I've got no problem with England's defence being built around two DMs. But the flipside to that you have to have two attacking FBs to compensate.
For me, Southgate's biggest crime has been his misuse of James/Shaw/Walker/Trippier/Chilwell. Between them, you've got some of the best offensive fullbacks in the world (two CL winners, one PL winner, one La Liga and one EL finalist this past season).
Southgate talks shite.Southgate mentioned him as one of the young players lacking a bit of tournament experience so he's helping him out by just not playing him, whilst playing other players who lack tournament experience....
Doesn’t really matter what the team is… this thread is a car crash of negativity before a ball has even been kicked.
I think he's including the Champions League in his definition of tournament football. Which, if we're honest, is a much higher level than the Euros.Southgate talks shite.
What tournament experience has Mount got? Or Rice? Or K-P? Or Foden?
Kane's got loads of tournament experience... still playing like a drunk.
Pick your best players/team (age, experience, number of caps should be secondary considerations). If they don't take their chance (I'm looking at you Foden), drop them and move on... it's a short tournament, you haven't got the luxury of passengers.
I think he's including the CL in his definition of tournament football. Which, if we're honest, is a much higher level than the Euros.
Granted, Rice and Phillips haven't played in the CL at all. But Sancho isn't in direct competition with them.
Fair point.How many CL games has saka played?
I didn't read it like that. Read it clearly as (proper) tournament..I think he's including the Champions League in his definition of tournament football. Which, if we're honest, is a much higher level than the Euros.
Granted, Rice and Phillips haven't played in the CL at all. But Sancho isn't in direct competition with them.
Yeah his comment was clearly rubbish, made me laugh reading it and then looking at the team selections.Southgate talks shite.
What tournament experience has Mount got? Or Rice? Or K-P? Or Foden?
Kane's got loads of tournament experience... still playing like a drunk.
Pick your best players/team (age, experience, number of caps should be secondary considerations). If they don't take their chance (I'm looking at you Foden), drop them and move on... it's a short tournament, you haven't got the luxury of passengers.
But we are already through???
Sterling > foden confirmed nowOpinions I guess, I think an attacker having 3-4 attacking moments and a game winning goal are worth more than his opposite flank having a single shot and doing feck all else.
Each to their own though.
As I said earlier, I’d have dropped all 3 attackers.
Saka is an alright start — it’s just one step forward two steps back with keeping some of the other massive underperformers still in there.