Physiocrat
Has No Mates
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 9,569
At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
Drop all three. It's a tournament. You can't wait for your favourites to play themselves into form.
At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
That's a pretty low bar though. Barely been better as well.At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
Foden was better, Kane is arguable.At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
Yeah right, he's been rubbishFoden was better, Kane is arguable.
He has been rubbish, still better than sterling.Yeah right, he's been rubbish
Foden was better, Kane is arguable.
Foden has been terrible.
Doesn't like none PL English players from the looks of it.I don't get the refusal to play Bellingham. He is a first-teamer for a Champion's
. He is a first-teamer for a Champion's League level side, but Southgate doesn't consider him good enough to get in over Phillips or Rice.
Sterling seems to have an automatic first-team place based on nothing. It is good Saka is getting a game, but surely Sancho should be in the team.
He's not. He's been better than Kane and Sterling for starters.
No he hasn’t, Sterling at least has a goal and a decent enough first game to his name. Foden has done nothing.
Sterling didn't have a decent enough first game. He's been poor and he's been poor the majority of the season hence him being dropped by his club
Sterling has been fecking gash both games let’s not beat around the bush.No he hasn’t, Sterling at least has a goal and a decent enough first game to his name. Foden has done nothing.
3 shots, 1 key pass, 1 goal.
Vs.
1 shot, 0 key passes, 0 goals.
Hmmm, I wonder which attacker did more.
This proves sterling has been good does it?
No, it’s proves he’s done more than Foden who’s been fexking terrible.
Well yes if you judge entire performance levels by three basic stats.
These analysts have it easy!
No it doesn’t - bollocks statsThis proves sterling has been good does it?
No it doesn’t - bollocks stats
I judged Foden with my eyes, and he was shite, posed zero threat. I checked the stats to see if that backed my up, it did.
No it doesn’t - bollocks stats
The goodwill that Foden has on this forum is cringeworthy - he’s been fecking rubbish yet people are defending him!
Should have gone to Specsavers.
Nope. Sterling did well in the first game and more than the other two did in two games combined. Not that I think he should start. It should be Grealish /Rashford and SanchoHe has been rubbish, still better than sterling.
Well yes if you judge entire performance levels by three basic stats.
These analysts have it easy!