Samid
He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Younis Khan has now converted more 90s to 100s than any player in test history (30), leaving his formerly tied record holder Sir Brad behind on 29.
Sachin converted 90s to 100s 51 times.
Younis Khan has now converted more 90s to 100s than any player in test history (30), leaving his formerly tied record holder Sir Brad behind on 29.
Sachin converted 90s to 100s 51 times.
Oh, it was the conversion percentage Ignore me.
The word you're looking for is consecutive
Long day, Tommy?
That is less than helpful of them.I was up watching TI6 at 5am, then I had to sort the dog out before the groomers came at 8:30. Had a nap on the sofa halfway through the day switching between Sky & TMS
If you heard it on the radio, though, you'd agree they worded it a bit weirdly! I mean damn, look at the quote...
"That is Younus' fourth century against England. It's his second in England. He made 173 at Headingley in 2006. It's his fourth quickest century. He has converted 30 of his scores in the nineties to 100, going past Don Bradman's 29."
No mention of the word consecutively or conversion rate I'm cutting myself some slack!
'Bairstow is comfortably the better batsman (than Sarfraz)' - Gower
I know Bairstow has had an amazing year but really?
Bairstow's had more than an amazing year to be fair.
'Comfortably' might be pushing it, but I do think he's the better bat.
I do agree with Warne though that Sarfraz is probably the best keeper/batsman in the world. Can't think of anyone whose as good with both the bat and the gloves as him.
Quinton De Kock?
Bairstow's had more than an amazing year to be fair.
'Comfortably' might be pushing it, but I do think he's the better bat.
I do agree with Warne though that Sarfraz is probably the best keeper/batsman in the world. Can't think of anyone whose as good with both the bat and the gloves as him.
Bairstow a bit lucky with that stumping, agree with others his glove work needs improvement.
Bairstows a better bat than Sarfraz. He could easily bat in the top 5 for England
Agreed but they're both really good batsmen to be fair for keepers.
I'm not yet convinced by Sarfraz as a really good batsman, hasn't looked that impressive in this series. And the stats show he has an average of 20 outside of subcontinental pitches. I just don't think he could be in the Pakistan team on his batting alone. Having said that he would be my choice as keeper for a World XI. Just better allround than the likes of Bairstow and De Kock.
Easy Pakistan win this. No chance.
Hard to say after the first match, but I agree.
If Pakistan go in with a lead of 175, we need to score at least 350-400 to give ourselves a sniff.
Only the second player in history to score double centuries against six test playing nations (other is Sangakarra).
Only the second player in history to score double centuries against six test playing nations (other is Sangakarra).
That batting performance was massively out of character for us, and even then it was touch and go for a long while. They've already got more to do and I don't have any faith they can repeat the escape.
Agree, England have no chance of winning. And the batting is too fragile to battle for a draw. Think Pakistan will just have to chase a relatively low score to win.