Berbaclass
Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Who says we can't do both anyway?Seriously? Whatever we're paying him in wages would have been better spent on the Sancho transfer fee or for a LB or CB.
Who says we can't do both anyway?Seriously? Whatever we're paying him in wages would have been better spent on the Sancho transfer fee or for a LB or CB.
What cover do we have for LB? DM? RW? CB?
0 natural right-sided forwards, 1 natural left-footed LB and one natural DM in the whole squad, many CBs but most are useless or injury prone so we don't have proper reliability there either. But no, let's spend tens of millions on a declining and injury prone striker, who might not even fit well with the squad. Can't wait.
Then why are we about to pay him first team wages to sit on the bench and fight for a position? This will end in tearsCavani is in no position to join any top club as anything other than “fighting for a position”. That much is obvious.
What kind of bollocks is this? So Cavani should be a starter?But which ones are good at it?
Martial is still adapting
Rashford is not good centrally
As yet have not seen Mason play there
Ole only plays him there in meaningless Cup games.
If he's not happy he can leave at the end of the season. People have raised questions about his injury record so I doubt he'll even be able to start most games.We're stocked in the middle so it's easy to break VDB in slowly but Cavani obviously still feel's he's elite, he isn't going to sit on the bench and be happy about it.
I hope you're right but I can't see it happening myselfWho says we can't do both anyway?
Then what's the fecking point in signing him? Josh King would have been a better option.If he's not happy he can leave at the end of the season. People have raised questions about his injury record so I doubt he'll even be able to start most games.
He would have cost more.Then what's the fecking point in signing him? Josh King would have been a better option.
If we bought a RW instead, who knows who plays and who is on the bench. But we would have far better balance in the squad and it would be better management of resources if we looked for a stop gap in January rather than now, 2 days before the window ends and when we were supposed to look at first 11 signings.
An interesting link up would be Sancho crossing for Cavani.It's the other way around, we cross a lot but there's often no one in the box ready for them. If we get Telles as well then there's an interesting linkup.
Who says we can't do both anyway?
Zlatan was not a forward in the throes of clear physical decline. Not every player there or thereabouts 34 is in the same physical state.How much did we pay Zlatan?
Is Josh King a better footballer?Then what's the fecking point in signing him? Josh King would have been a better option.
This is what I'm worried about. How does a 33 year Cavani fit Solskjaer's plans? Short answer: he doesn't. So will he sit on the bench for 2 seasons? Probably not quietly. In that case does Solskjaer have to play him considering the wages he's on? Yes most likely. Who suffers? Martial, Rashford or Greenwood.What kind of bollocks is this? So Cavani should be a starter?
We're stocked in the middle so it's easy to break VDB in slowly but Cavani obviously still feel's he's elite, he isn't going to sit on the bench and be happy about it.
That seems like a bunch of excuses for the club hierarchy. We had half an year to plan this, even with the pandemic happening, we still had loads of time to plan everything properly.looks like we are buying a left back. We have multiple players who can play midfield, it might not be ideal but we can cope.
We have more than enough CB cover, whether the quality is there is up for debate of course.
we clearly needed a striker. if we didn’t buy him, it doesn’t mean we were going to buy a CB and a midfielder as well does it.
we need a right winger, but buying Cavani doesn’t affect that.
we can’t go any buy 1/2 a brand new team every year, that’s not realistic. Get over yourself
you seem to think buying one player means we can’t do anything else, or haven’t tried.
On current ability? Let's see Cavani play a game in the PL before we make that claim but would he be cheaper? Yes. Would he be happy to be second string? Yes.Is Josh King a better footballer?
Nor is Cavani reliant on physical attributes. His movement is exceptional.Zlatan was not a forward in the throes of clear physical decline. Not every player there or thereabouts 34 is in the same physical state.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/54404308BBC said:It is understood the package on the table does not go beyond the current pay structure, so United feel any comparisons with Alexis Sanchez, who was given a £350,000-a-week contract which he failed to come close to justifying, would be wide of the mark.
What a dumb post, it must be hard for you to follow what has been said already.you didn’t answer my question, and it seems pointless debating with you.
No it's all about marketing.Cavani was a beast of a player but this deal to me is as much marketing as it is about football,
Cavani was a beast of a player but this deal to me is as much marketing as it is about football,
It will not surprise me in the least to see him wear #7 and see how much coin that will generate.
According to this article from Laurie Whitwell, Cavani was demanding 9 million Euros per year (~173k/week).
There's no exact info on what we agreed on with him, but that should give us an idea of what he'll be earning in the club.
If Martial is injured who do you play there then?What kind of bollocks is this? So Cavani should be a starter?
Bit of an exaggeration tbh. Yes, people will complain but imagine going the bench options from Lingard, Ighalo, Williams to Dvb,Cavani and Shaw ?I honestly do not understand your transfer strategy this window. You don't need a striker nor did you need the Dutch guy really. You are focusing on areas you dont really need improving and neglecting the areas you need investment.
What if he comes in and it's Sanchez all over again? Someone earning big money, thinks they should start but isn't doing it on the pitch? This is such a big risk with very little chance it will pay off.mid he comes with the attitude that he should be our starting no 9. Brilliant. That’s what’s called competition, if he proves he can do it, all for it. Martial will need to up his game, fantastic news.
your negative is my positive.
The idea is rotation, but Cavani is not happy with just that. He is the type to push to play. He has rivalry with Neymar, then Icardi.Where’s this nugget come from? You think he’s joining to be a starter.
Then why are we about to pay him first team wages to sit on the bench and fight for a position? This will end in tears
Then he's shown the door in the summer.What if he comes in and it's Sanchez all over again? Someone earning big money, thinks they should start but isn't doing it on the pitch? This is such a big risk with very little chance it will pay off.
On current ability? Let's see Cavani play a game in the PL before we make that claim but would he be cheaper? Yes. Would he be happy to be second string? Yes.
Why have we signed a huge name at the age of 33 to play as our main striker?
have we signed Cavani as our main striker? I’m sure Martial will have something to say about that.
What a dumb post, it must be hard for you to follow what has been said already.
and his parking spot.Yup taking his number 9 shirt too.
You play the other 3 players that are available for that position.If Martial is injured who do you play there then?