strandty
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,825
What if he’s given the number 7 tomorrow
Wasting wages on a player for 3-4 months, whilst also paying his club money to allow him stay with us and not play, so we can waste wages on him.Leaving in 3 months
Yes you're right. Sanchez was good signing too. Ed and Co are doing a great job backing the manager.
its reported 200k which around the same as Salah and less than Firminho/Mane. His own agent who we are paying 10m took the piss out of us before it aswell
I actually hope that happens, just for the memes.What if he’s given the number 7 tomorrow
#EdinsONI actually hope that happens, just for the memes.
Wasting wages on a player for 3-4 months, whilst also paying his club money to allow him stay with us and not play, so we can waste wages on him.
Ed Woodward the genius strikes again, money is nothing to him, he can do things other clubs can only dream of.
If the experience knows the league and the club well enough. Here Cavani is as new as the other guy to English football and Manchester...For some strange reason I keep remembering the experienced player helping the young player settling down argument told by various journalists a few weeks back. Are we heading to us signing two Uruguayan players ( Cavani and Pellestri)?
Ole philosophy blah blahNo that can't be true because it goes against the caf narrative.
I know that, the point I'm making is that having 2 backup strikers sort of hints that our transfer planning is a bit all over the place.Leaving in 3 months
likely on more than Bruno. People are so used to stupid Glazernomics now they see 200k good value for a back up striker nobody else would pay for all summer. i assume these big round numbers are just easier to calculate for our negotiatorsWoodward and Matt Judge are absolute baffoons, if they end up paying 10M euros to the agent and £200kpw to Cavani.
I wonder if Matt Judge knows that the aim of the game is to pay as little as possible, not the opposite.
Also, if Cavani does get £200kpw, will he be on more that Bruno Fernandes? Have I got this right?
I know that, the point I'm making is that having 2 backup strikers sort of hints that our transfer planning is a bit all over the place.
If we were planning on signing Cavani why extend Ighalo?
Just all seems a bit disjointed, no clear strategy, or worse, we are failing to implement our actual strategy and abandoning it and panic buying.
I've no real problem with signing Cavani if it's part of a concrete plan, but don't think it is. And if he's our last buy in this window the board have serious questions to answer.
Still hope he succeeds here mind.
It's not really out of the question, after all, he's a prolific goalscorer.Imagine he goes on a goal scoring spree.
Haven’t they changed their tune in the last couple of hours from mega wages to great deal? Maybe the early rumours of huge wages were off the mark after all.No that can't be true because it goes against the caf narrative.
Worst run club in the PL.I'm glad I'm not the only one.
I am bemused how on Earth our board could even contemplate this deal.
It doesn't matter what Kane could be paid; the fact of the matter is Vardy, Kane, Mane, Salah, the best performing forwards in the league, are on less. It doesn't matter how that is spun, it is a serious misuse of funds and precisely why we are in the predicament we are in.Cavani has a better pedigree and if Kane leaves spurs to comes here he will break the wage structure.
See above. You can count on one hand forwards on more money than that in the league. All of them at least have logic behind what they're paid, too. Cavani hasn't been able to find a club because he's no longer a forward clubs are prepared to risk those kind of wages on.It's not our fault Daniel Levy is a cheap cnut.
We should've been doing that from the moment we signed him, not 2 days before the window closes.No it implies we are planning ahead for Ighalo leaving, not bringing in a replacement for Ighalo this window would have been poor planning
He does. Matt Judge too, just poorly ran overall.
But I can't see him selling much shirts, it's just a desperate last minute signing. Someone better than no one kinda deal.
He's arguably better than most forwards in the league.See above. You can count on one hand forwards on more money than that in the league. All of them at least have logic behind what they're paid, too. Cavani hasn't been able to find a club because he's no longer a forward clubs are prepared to risk those kind of wages on.
I'd rate Woodward for his trolling skillsWhat if he’s given the number 7 tomorrow
So it makes sense paying, apparently, a worthless player, paying his club so he stays for a few matches more and then don't even play again after signing Cavani?You're making zero sense, unless you think we should not have extended him at the time and risked having only on striker for the following season
Everyone is laughing at us. And they are right to. Reminds me of this...
That's not really what the people who actually follow french football have been reporting. It's been nothing but positive .Anyone comparing Cavani to Zlatan, clearly haven't followed French football. As far apart in style, leadership, fitness and where their career are at the time they had this move.
I wonder if Matt Judge knows that the aim of the game is to pay as little as possible, not the opposite.
That would actually be pretty funny in fairnessWhat if he’s given the number 7 tomorrow
everyone is laughing at large parts of our fanbase.