Man. You brought up the topic again that Bayern didn't want Havertz because he wouldn't start ahead of Müller, not me. You also put in a side dig against me ("objective watchers yada yada") and in your response you claimed you wouldn't mention him again just to highlight the exact same discussion again only a few lines later (" 3) Bayern didn't really get serious with him, because of the reasons that were mentioned (which Flick, KHR and even Holzhäuser confirmed). "). So again, what's wrong with you? Is that some sort of weird tactic to make the other person seem biased against a player you like?
I also never said "Havertz is so much better". What I said was that it's by no means a given that Müller would bench him. Period. That being said Müller is not a good technician by the standard we're comparing him with. He's got a decent first touch, he's a decent passer and a bad dribbler. And no, I'm not mistaken flashiness with good technique. I've seen countless games in which Müller displayed atrocious ball control and lost so many balls without need. Müller was downright painful to watch for a sustained period of time for the national team, screwing up the easiest touches and passes, and he also did not really do anything special for Bayern in that time either. The fact that he's now back to his best under Flick is great, it really is because he's a very likable person, but it doesn't change the fact that he has a very low bottom level - especially in terms of technique. One and a half years ago at most, a large proportion of Bayern fans wanted him gone rather sooner than later.
That's what I mean with "Müller is great in a functioning team" but we've never seen Havertz play in a similarly well drilled squad. While Müller is surrounded by Thiago, Kimmich, Gnabry, Lewandowski, Davies and Coman, Havertz had to play with Bellarabi, Amiri, Volland, Diaby and Demirbay throughout last season. He was double marked constantly because he was by far our most dangerous player - Müller never had to deal with that. Not once. The fact that you're ignoring all that exposes that you're anything but objective. If you really had watched Havertz play as closely as you suggest, you would've realized that he combines many aspects of Müller's game (off the ball movement, keeping things simply, timing etc.) with (albeit sometimes still inconsistent) technical brillance.
