MUFC07
Full Member
Try middle English, see how it turns out.
Apparently, we've had an "average" midfield ever since Roy Keane fell from grace.
In the past two matches, Paul Scholes has been the best in the country. That comes after a season, where 80% of the time, he was excellent. Giggs was also fantastic before his broken arm. Fletcher needs no explanation. Carrick has had a poor season - he will pick it up though. Gibson has had a good break through year. Factor in Anderson and Hargreaves, plus one or two of the younger lads, and it's clear that we have good quality and depth in that area for next season.
Apparently, we've had an "average" midfield ever since Roy Keane fell from grace.
In the past two matches, Paul Scholes has been the best in the country. That comes after a season, where 80% of the time, he was excellent. Giggs was also fantastic before his broken arm. Fletcher needs no explanation. Carrick has had a poor season - he will pick it up though. Gibson has had a good break through year. Factor in Anderson and Hargreaves, plus one or two of the younger lads, and it's clear that we have good quality and depth in that area for next season.
I think people use the word 'average' to desribe our midfield in the context of the midfields we've had in the past. It's certainly not average though. But it's fallen below the level set by the defenders and forwards, IMO
From the mid-nineties, the one thing you could count on is that in a big game, our midfield would impose itself, and make the other team worry. With the players we currently have, I'm not convinced that's the case.
Giggs and Scholes have seen better days. We've yet to figure out what Anderson is, or even whether he has the ability to play five yard passes with any sort of regularity. Hargreaves is an unknown. Carrick's been blighted by poor form, and looks a shell of a man at the moment. Gibson tends to watch the game go on around him when he isn't scoring long range goals. Fletcher's been probably our most important midfielder this season, which is a problem, because he's the sort of player who should never be your most important midfielder.
All of that would be okay if they were more than the sum of their parts, but they're clearly not. And it's hard to see the situation righting itself without someone coming in to add real quality. Who that might be I haven't a fecking clue.
That's such an ignorant statement. Have you seen him play? The bloke has earned the right to be spoken about as our most important midfield player thanks to two years of fantastic performances.
Apparently, we've had an "average" midfield ever since Roy Keane fell from grace.
In the past two matches, Paul Scholes has been the best in the country. That comes after a season, where 80% of the time, he was excellent. Giggs was also fantastic before his broken arm. Fletcher needs no explanation. Carrick has had a poor season - he will pick it up though. Gibson has had a good break through year. Factor in Anderson and Hargreaves, plus one or two of the younger lads, and it's clear that we have good quality and depth in that area for next season.
That's such an ignorant statement. Have you seen him play? The bloke has earned the right to be spoken about as our most important midfield player thanks to two years of fantastic performances.
Settle down, princess. I agree he is one of our most important players.
I meant a player who isn't in the top bracket technically should never be your most important player, unless they're a very special player, like Roy Keane. Which he isn't.
Fletch has been fantastic for us the past few seasons. You'll find no arguments here. But in the days of the Beckham-Scholes-Keane-Giggs midfield, for example, he wouldn't have gotten a look in.
For heaven's sake... I wish you'd put more thought into all these posts rather than just replying to intelligent, well thought out contributions with cliches and abuse.
Frankly it's true that our midfield has dropped a level - or two - since Keane's era. Look at the famous midfield four - Giggs, Keane, Scholes, Beckham.
All of them were in clear contention for a World XI at the time - maybe you'd swap Scholes, unfortunately, for Zidane but that could be THE midfield of the 90's.
Can you say the same now? Do Anderson, Carrick, Hargreaves or Fletcher make the current World XI? Do Giggs or Scholes?
For a Fergie era midefield it really is comparatively average, but still highly commendable, hard working and effective.
For heaven's sake... I wish you'd put more thought into all these posts rather than just replying to intelligent, well thought out contributions with cliches and abuse.
Frankly it's true that our midfield has dropped a level - or two - since Keane's era. Look at the famous midfield four - Giggs, Keane, Scholes, Beckham.
All of them were in clear contention for a World XI at the time - maybe you'd swap Scholes, unfortunately, for Zidane but that could be THE midfield of the 90's.
Can you say the same now? Do Anderson, Carrick, Hargreaves or Fletcher make the current World XI? Do Giggs or Scholes?
For a Fergie era midefield it really is comparatively average, but still highly commendable, hard working and effective.
And what exactly does getting into a world XI have to do with anything? When all available and on song, I'd say our midfield is a classic example of the sum being greater than its parts.
Maybe you lot are in that camp that herald the likes of Essien as one of the best in the world - with his 25 PL appearances in two seasons. I'd have Fletcher personally. Cue abuse and ridicule.
no -one is saying our midfield is rubbish
however i think we've needed a BRILLIANT midfielder for a couple of seasons now - one who performs week in, week out, not one who shines sporadically.
i watched us play city last week on ESPN from 93-94 when we came back from the dead in the sedond half - our midfield was ince, keane, giggs/sharpe,v kanchelskis.
that's what we need - and we don't have a keane or an ince!
yes but during that time we also had ronaldo.You're argument has been trotted out by many a poster over the last four years. The notion would probably have more credibility had we not won an absurd amount of trophies in that time.
The driving force doesn't have to be from the central midfield area.
yes but during that time we also had ronaldo.
all our best teams have come from strong midfields
yes but during that time we also had ronaldo.
all our best teams have come from strong midfields
Our defence was better than the midfield in 07/08.
So you're saying that the 07/08 team had a strong midfield?
in ronaldo we had the best player in thw world - that would rather seem to help the team he was playing in!
That's what we hoped for last summer too, isn't it? Anderson to step up, hargreaves to be available, carrick to not be poo - none of that really happened, we were lucky scholes especially played to the level he did. Should we be relying on the same things again next season? Giggs and scholes are only getting older, our safety net is wearing thinner.
Well, at least he can say he was involved in the goal
I think firing the ball at Rooney's face just a few yards away qualifies for that
He's in... ooh my God Berbatov
He somehow almost managed to feck up the goal, but Rooney saved it with his header.
Please don't leave our club in the summer Dimitar and we'll strengthen the midfield
Yes because that obviously wasn't aimed at his head or anything...
oh yes, veron would be another fair comparison...hard to see berbatov staying past this summer. has shades of forlan's tenure at united: both obviously have quality, but can't seem to make a go out of it in manchester. good luck to him elsewhere, as long as it's not in the prem...
Yes because that obviously wasn't aimed at his head or anything...