Did we waste €200 million this summer?

Martinez, Hojlund Eriksen have been the only ones you can't fault the rest have been errors.
Amrabat and Reguilón I'd add as part of the good batch.
Mount will prove himself before too long to the doubters (I like him already).
Casemiro is brilliant when his legs hold up.
Malacia, Onana, Antony are very underwhelming. Definitely got fleeced on Antony. Probably overpaid on Onana too, although he has to remember how to play keeper at some point.
Overall, Ten Hag's new players have been good and improved the team.

Martinez - 9/10
Eriksen - 8/10
Casemiro - 8/10
Antony - 5/10
Malacia - 3/10
Mount - 7/10
Onana - 5/10
Reguilón - 7/10
Amrabat - 7/10
 
Last edited:
Mount has been like 5/10 or 6/10. Definitely not 7/10. Overall i would give Ten Haag signings something like 6.5/10. It all depends now what Amrabat and Hojlund will do in the future. But the fact is that 6.5/10 is not enough, not even near. Especially compared to money spent. Whole club has to make better work with transfers. But had we post SAF? No. There must be some major problem in our scouting system or somewhere. We can´t negotiate, we can´t find value for money. Even big money transfers are pretty likely to fail.
 
Did we waste €200 million this summer?

"Waste" is probably excessively harsh, but one could not reasonably arrive at the conclusion that 200m (if that's what it was) was wisely spent.

We needed a striker, the 70m? we spent on Hojlund will I believe prove to be a good spend. But we spent 70m on an unproven striker.
We didn't need Mount unless the plan is to phase out Bruno, who will still have some market value at the end of this season and really should be moved on to Spain or Saudi Arabia, so I'm not yet prepared to argue that the 60m for Mount was wasted. But if the plan is to keep Bruno and Mount long term, then 60m was shoveled straight into the furnace.
40m was shoveled straight into the furnace for Onana. Under the most of optimistic of assessments he's not an upgrade on De Gea; and based no what we've seen so far he is a significant downgrade. I don't know if the Yashin Award is still a thing, but it's a very safe bet that Onana will be nowhere near the long list, let alone the short list. Expect is to get peltered for goals match after match unless one of our backup keepers can man up.
I think Onana was actually nominated for that.
 
Did we waste €200 million this summer?

"Waste" is probably excessively harsh, but one could not reasonably arrive at the conclusion that 200m (if that's what it was) was wisely spent.

We needed a striker, the 70m? we spent on Hojlund will I believe prove to be a good spend. But we spent 70m on an unproven striker.
We didn't need Mount unless the plan is to phase out Bruno, who will still have some market value at the end of this season and really should be moved on to Spain or Saudi Arabia, so I'm not yet prepared to argue that the 60m for Mount was wasted. But if the plan is to keep Bruno and Mount long term, then 60m was shoveled straight into the furnace.
40m was shoveled straight into the furnace for Onana. Under the most of optimistic of assessments he's not an upgrade on De Gea; and based no what we've seen so far he is a significant downgrade. I don't know if the Yashin Award is still a thing, but it's a very safe bet that Onana will be nowhere near the long list, let alone the short list. Expect is to get peltered for goals match after match unless one of our backup keepers can man up.
Why are you doing this?
 
Amrabat and Reguilón I'd add as part of the good batch.
Mount will prove himself before too long to the doubters (I like him already).
Casemiro is brilliant when his legs hold up.
Malacia, Onana, Antony are very underwhelming. Definitely got fleeced on Antony. Probably overpaid on Onana too, although he has to remember how to play keeper at some point.
Overall, Ten Hag's new players have been good and improved the team.

Martinez - 9/10
Eriksen - 8/10
Casemiro - 8/10
Antony - 5/10
Malacia - 3/10
Mount - 7/10
Onana - 5/10
Reguilón - 7/10
Amrabat - 7/10

Malacia 3/10? :wenger:

He cost £13m and is a perfectly viable back-up that has a fantastic mentality along with tenacity and actually decent technique. I don't think he is good enough in the starting line up, but let's not pretend he is particularly worse than Dalot.
 
This thread should be posted at the end of the season and not in the first six weeks of it FFS!
 
Hojlund - dury is still out but is getting better.

Mount - waste of money and a very poor decision by the manager to stick to signing him, especially when he's decided to promote Hannibal and Mainoo in that position and we still have Bruno and Eriksen too. Could have saved £55m and spent it on a young DM who will be Casemiro long term replacement.

Evans - didn't shit his pants vs Burnley and will likely act as a good voice in training for youngsters. Was also free.

Onana - huge mistake buying him, his ball playing abilities are overrated and is not a £50m upgrade on de Gea. Should have got Raya on loan with £30m option like Arsenal and put the £50m towards a CB and Varane long term replacement.

Amrabat - looks OK but isn't a LB and seems to have quite a heavy touch and I don't like the way he turns inside, then proceeds to dribble across the front of our box before playing a square pass.

Reguillion - probably our best signing so far, hopefully it continues.

We will now spend next summer chase a replacement for Varane and Casemiro whilst struggling to offload them, unless Saudi come knocking. If Onana keeps making mistakes, we may have to look an alternative to him also.

We also have an issue with Shaws fitness as he keeps missing large chunks of seasons, he's becoming unreliable to stay fit.
 
This thread is a bit premature. Mount is only back from Injury , Reguillon is currently injured , Sofyan is being played out position to cover our injury crisis. And Onana is finding his feet. Does anyone remember When De Gea arrived and the same questions were being asked about him ? He was pretty Dodgy to begin but the boss believed in him and he ended up being a very good keeper for us . Its early season no need to panic just yet.
 
Hojlund - dury is still out but is getting better.

Mount - waste of money and a very poor decision by the manager to stick to signing him, especially when he's decided to promote Hannibal and Mainoo in that position and we still have Bruno and Eriksen too. Could have saved £55m and spent it on a young DM who will be Casemiro long term replacement.

Evans - didn't shit his pants vs Burnley and will likely act as a good voice in training for youngsters. Was also free.

Onana - huge mistake buying him, his ball playing abilities are overrated and is not a £50m upgrade on de Gea. Should have got Raya on loan with £30m option like Arsenal and put the £50m towards a CB and Varane long term replacement.

Amrabat - looks OK but isn't a LB and seems to have quite a heavy touch and I don't like the way he turns inside, then proceeds to dribble across the front of our box before playing a square pass.

Reguillion - probably our best signing so far, hopefully it continues.

We will now spend next summer chase a replacement for Varane and Casemiro whilst struggling to offload them, unless Saudi come knocking. If Onana keeps making mistakes, we may have to look an alternative to him also.

We also have an issue with Shaws fitness as he keeps missing large chunks of seasons, he's becoming unreliable to stay fit.

Mount may turn out to be a very good signing so it is way too soon to call it a waste.

As for Casemiro's long term successor for £55m. Please tell me who that is. If it was that easy, then Chelsea and Arsenal wouldn't have bought young CDMs for +£100m in Caicedo and Rice. This isn't FIFA Career mode.
 
This thread is a bit premature. Mount is only back from Injury , Reguillon is currently injured , Sofyan is being played out position to cover our injury crisis. And Onana is finding his feet. Does anyone remember When De Gea arrived and the same questions were being asked about him ? He was pretty Dodgy to begin but the boss believed in him and he ended up being a very good keeper for us . Its early season no need to panic just yet.
It is not premature. It is called football chat. How things look now is perfectly legit football chat about nearly everything. If not, then we should shut down most of threads and wait for the end of season to talk about it. In some things we should wait even further. For example; to say is someone good or bad signing, we should wait for him to leave the club and then evaluate what he has done during his spell here.

This thread is about first impression. Of course that at the end of the season we will be much smarter about all this.
 
This thread is a bit premature. Mount is only back from Injury , Reguillon is currently injured , Sofyan is being played out position to cover our injury crisis. And Onana is finding his feet. Does anyone remember When De Gea arrived and the same questions were being asked about him ? He was pretty Dodgy to begin but the boss believed in him and he ended up being a very good keeper for us . Its early season no need to panic just yet.

De Gea came into an established winning team patience was easily afforded. The problem for most United players is because the manager picks the recruitment and are inevitably fired the team is never settled. So new signings come into a team with broken foundations. If you noticed the difference with City or even Liverpool when Fabinho arrived they give the players time to be nurtured and often don't feature them until the players resonate with the managers vision.

The problem here is that Klopp / Guardiola are excellent coaches on an individual basis whereas it's an area I feel United are lacking. Every player who comes here the impetus is always on individual brilliance as opposed to a team dynamic. I personally don't rate the summer signings at all in regards to actually making significant improvements from the squad last season. Hojlund is appearing to exceed expectations so I'll hold my hands up in that regard.

There are too many variables why these threads are always apparent even after a season of a manager signing certain players. The club is run like a complete joke.
 
Early days but it definitely wouldn’t be like us to do that.
 
Mount may turn out to be a very good signing so it is way too soon to call it a waste.

As for Casemiro's long term successor for £55m. Please tell me who that is. If it was that easy, then Chelsea and Arsenal wouldn't have bought young CDMs for +£100m in Caicedo and Rice. This isn't FIFA Career mode.
Lavia, Vermeeren and Ugarte are who would have been solid signings for £55-60m. Caicedo isn't a CDM, so you might want to have a re-think on that one.
 
Lavia, Vermeeren and Ugarte are who would have been solid signings for £55-60m. Caicedo isn't a CDM, so you might want to have a re-think on that one.

Lavia and Vermeeren are kids and there is no way they are ready to take over for Casemiro. You are assuming they develop to be world class players based on them being talented, but there are way too many examples of players who never lived up to the hype. I agree that we should have gone for Ugarte.

Yes, Caicedo is a CDM.
 
Lavia and Vermeeren are kids and there is no way they are ready to take over for Casemiro. You are assuming they develop to be world class players based on them being talented, but there are way too many examples of players who never lived up to the hype. I agree that we should have gone for Ugarte.

Yes, Caicedo is a CDM.
Remind me how old Rice and Caicedo are?
 
I think all the signings are really good ones. Give them time and let them get in form. Otherwise they will never succeed!

The only one who haven’t performed is obviously Onana. But he feels like a player who need a lot of consistency and confidence. Let’s give him this season at least.
 
Evans count as a player formed in Manchester United academy, it's quite handy to follow roster rules.
 
Lavia and Vermeeren are kids and there is no way they are ready to take over for Casemiro. You are assuming they develop to be world class players based on them being talented, but there are way too many examples of players who never lived up to the hype. I agree that we should have gone for Ugarte.

Yes, Caicedo is a CDM.
When Lavia and Vermeeren are ready, they will cost EPL club 100m.
 
Hojlund - dury is still out but is getting better.

Mount - waste of money and a very poor decision by the manager to stick to signing him, especially when he's decided to promote Hannibal and Mainoo in that position and we still have Bruno and Eriksen too. Could have saved £55m and spent it on a young DM who will be Casemiro long term replacement.

Evans - didn't shit his pants vs Burnley and will likely act as a good voice in training for youngsters. Was also free.

Onana - huge mistake buying him, his ball playing abilities are overrated and is not a £50m upgrade on de Gea. Should have got Raya on loan with £30m option like Arsenal and put the £50m towards a CB and Varane long term replacement.

Amrabat - looks OK but isn't a LB and seems to have quite a heavy touch and I don't like the way he turns inside, then proceeds to dribble across the front of our box before playing a square pass.

Reguillion - probably our best signing so far, hopefully it continues.

We will now spend next summer chase a replacement for Varane and Casemiro whilst struggling to offload them, unless Saudi come knocking. If Onana keeps making mistakes, we may have to look an alternative to him also.

We also have an issue with Shaws fitness as he keeps missing large chunks of seasons, he's becoming unreliable to stay fit.
Onana didn't cost 50m pounds.
 
Hojlund - dury is still out but is getting better.

Mount - waste of money and a very poor decision by the manager to stick to signing him, especially when he's decided to promote Hannibal and Mainoo in that position and we still have Bruno and Eriksen too. Could have saved £55m and spent it on a young DM who will be Casemiro long term replacement.

Evans - didn't shit his pants vs Burnley and will likely act as a good voice in training for youngsters. Was also free.

Onana - huge mistake buying him, his ball playing abilities are overrated and is not a £50m upgrade on de Gea. Should have got Raya on loan with £30m option like Arsenal and put the £50m towards a CB and Varane long term replacement.

Amrabat - looks OK but isn't a LB and seems to have quite a heavy touch and I don't like the way he turns inside, then proceeds to dribble across the front of our box before playing a square pass.

Reguillion - probably our best signing so far, hopefully it continues.

We will now spend next summer chase a replacement for Varane and Casemiro whilst struggling to offload them, unless Saudi come knocking. If Onana keeps making mistakes, we may have to look an alternative to him also.

We also have an issue with Shaws fitness as he keeps missing large chunks of seasons, he's becoming unreliable to stay fit.

Good post. No clue why we signed Mount for so much, some wanted to trick themselves into thinking he'd be some effective box to box because he was 2x fan player of the year but they're wrong.

It's funny that we need Casemiro and Varane replacements when we've only recently signed them. A RW is needed too as Antony will never be good enough.

This club is just a circus of signing the wrong players and then spending even more money trying to fix those problems.

The number one thing the club could do is hire a recruitment team that have a clue when it comes to building a footballing team.
 
It doesn't look the most efficient use of money but I would caution against a full judgement at this stage.

But it's very hard to see a world in which Mason Mount becomes the player that is suggestive of being a priority signing that dents your transfer budget before you even get going in the market. Especially given the personnel we already have. If we were missing such a player, then maybe 50 million is relative value for an English player at his age. As it is, we probably frittered away valuable funds on a non-decisive player in a position we don't need or if he is moved position that he is unsuited to and there were probably better players available for. He could prove me wrong given this early stage but that's my feeling on him and it was my instinct when we were first linked based on his nondescript England performances.

Onana is not playing well, but I will judge him after a longer period of time. This is a signing we desperately needed, but performance will dictate if he was the one.

I don't think Hojlund should be questioned, he has shown his ability. Would you rather have him or rather he was scoring goals like he did midweek for Atalanta, adding £££ onto his fee every time he so much as moves towards the opposition goal? I would rather have him now, it was making the best out of a difficult striker market.

Not sure what to think on Amrabat, hasn't played a game in a proper position but he's not world class is he. He's supposed to offer an option but if a few of your other major signings don't work out then is he really going to redeem that situation? Not sure. Good player though.

I think it's very much up in the air at this stage, you wouldn't really hang your hat on this lot as definites. The best bet is Hojlund because he has years of development ahead and already quite promising. The others have no such mitigation.
 
50m on Mount seemed utterly baffling, but you hoped he'd be one of those underwhelming players that made the team better.

Hard to judge at the moment as the whole thing has been off this season.
 
Other than Mount (decent player but not what we need); Onana (was always known for his weak wrist in Inter/Ajax) , all other transfers make sense.
 
I remember Alex Ferguson having a golden rule with transfers in that if he was going to sign a player, the assumption was that they HAD to be better than what we had - and because we were winning titles that was always difficult for him.

What's a bit weird about these transfers is that it's hard to justify them really, because Onana had to be better than de Gea who - off the back of a poor season - was expected to be at least his equal and an improvement with his feet. That hasn't happened, at least not yet. Mount was expected to be at best a backup for Bruno Fernandes who is playing far too much football for us - in some ways that's useful but it doesn't improve us. And Hojlund is a hugely expensive gamble - but it does seem like he's going to be value for his fee eventually, he's clearly a good player. But right now he has way too much pressure on him to deliver results. I'm sure eventually he will.

So we've kind of gone backwards since the summer. And we let a few players like Brandon Williams - tearing up the championship now - and de Gea go, and Fred too. And our fringe players - like McTominay - still seem far too important. Fred had his ups and downs but we didn't replace him at all. Not the best window for us.
 
As I said in another thread what baffles me the most is Ten Haag loves a limited player. He somehow manages to get one trick ponys. Thats why people think they are great because they have one trick (ok maybe 2,3) thats brilliant, but they are fundamentally flawed in key aspects of the game -

Antony - Brilliant close control, work rate, nice left foot curler from edge of box but fundamentally flawed because he is 1 footed and cant cross/score
Onana - Brilliant with his feet but fundamentally flawed because other keeper skills mostly shot stopping, 1 on 1's are sht
Amrabat - Everyone loves him so far. Brilliant work rate and short passing but fundamentally flawed in defensive skills i.e tackling/heading and offensive skills i.e shooting/key passes/long passes etc
Regulon - Brilliant work rate, link up play, nice crossing but fundamentally flawed defensively.
Weghorst - Very good example. Brilliant work rate, can tackle, hold up play, passing good for a forward but fundamentally flawed because of pace and shooting
Malacia is the same as Regulon. Nice going forward but flawed defensively.

Mount/Casemiro/Hojlund/Eriksen seem the right players as in they dont have glaring weaknesses to their games. The problems with these three are age related and playing out off position.

There is a reason no big teams were going for the players we bought. Regulon has been at big teams but they got rid. He couldn't even get in to Tottenham's team. I realize he was an emergency signing but some of our fans think he's the second coming of Roberto Carlos. Amrabat has played for no one till he's 27. Onana was on a free for Inter. Ok biggish team but thats about it. I dont think we were competing with anyone for Antony. Big teams wouldn't sign these players
 
Last edited:
If what Ole said was true (and this transfer window looks like it’s backing up his comments) and Ten Hag was only able to buy three players.. then it’s hard to argue with the positions targeted except the Mount transfer, I think we should have signed a proper fullback that actually knows how to attack and overlap instead
 
Amrabat and Reguilón I'd add as part of the good batch.
Mount will prove himself before too long to the doubters (I like him already).
Casemiro is brilliant when his legs hold up.
Malacia, Onana, Antony are very underwhelming. Definitely got fleeced on Antony. Probably overpaid on Onana too, although he has to remember how to play keeper at some point.
Overall, Ten Hag's new players have been good and improved the team.

Martinez - 9/10
Eriksen - 8/10
Casemiro - 8/10
Antony - 5/10
Malacia - 3/10
Mount - 7/10
Onana - 5/10
Reguilón - 7/10
Amrabat - 7/10

My ratings would be more;

Martinez 8.5 - Last season a strong 9 during a long period and maybe the player that had most impact on the team with his attitude and fighting spirit, i remember when Dalot made a block and all 4 (Dalot, Martinez, Varane and Shaw) defenders got together and celebrated it like Gladiators fighting for their lives. That spirit made our defense even stronger and gave it a morale boost, hence why De Gea won the golden glove. Reminding me of Vidic. This season so far a solid 7 and injuries so it bring down the rating a bit.

Eriksen 6.5- Some matches last season he was a 8, maybe 8.5, but in to many games he does not show up and when his creativity and passing is not 100%, his physic makes him useless in the CDM/holding position and a player like McTominey is more valuable at those times. He is a player that at his prime would have been perfect for this team, also he is someone that everybody loves to like. Humble, no star attraction, seems like a good person, family man and remembering what happened to him at the Euros and just the fact that he made a fast comeback, carried Brentford where he had a great season and joined us for free does not make things worse.

Casemiro 8 - Had 2-3 great spels last season where he was the Casemiro from Real Madrids glory CL times, he was outstanding and totally owned the area between the defenders and the attacking midfielders. He won the ball, dictated the tempo, cowered grown, carried the ball, great passes going forward, even scored goals and assisted some. The 2 red cards that got him suspended 6 games was not good for us, and not was the fact that we did not have anyone to rotate with him so his energy dropped a lot last 2 months and that at his age now completely changes his performances, sometime we just had him on the field simple because of his status and leadership. This season, he has not been himself so far, but so has not many others either, so i hope that we can bring back the energy to the team because if we are already low on it this early in the season, then we are in big trouble. I also feel that he has not the stamina longer to play alone behind to more offensive CMs (like he did in Madrid with Kroos and Modric). He needs at least a ball carrying, deep sitting player next to him with a good physic (merge McTominey and Eriksen and we would have the perfect partner for him behind Bruno/Mount).

Antony 4 - If you made me look at all his matches for Manchester United, not knowing his price tag I would say the he is a fun player to watch when things work out for him and that i like his left foot and fighting spirit. Would probably guess he is a talent from our academy that we hope will develop to a good player (not near world class) and that we can give him 1-2-3 seasons to prove himself and keep developing and adapting to PL football. I would also say that he needs to work hard on his decision making, right foot so he can make faster passing in to the box, now that we have fast and strong number 9, when countering so we don´t give the opponent time to organize their defense, work on his dribblings and develop more effective moves and not ever again to the 360 "trick" with the ball. BUT if you instead after watching all his games, told me that the manager that had him in his team last 2 seasons in Ajax did everything in his power his first summer transfer window to bring him to us, only one year after we paid a huge amount for Sancho to make that position his and the year before that brought 2 big talents in Pellistri and Amad (that we also paid a lot for) also playing at the same position, i would not understand what he saw in him that made him so convinced that he outplay all 3 of them big times (otherwise he would not ignore that we paid around 120m euro for Amad and Sancho). AND IF you then told me that we had no other number 9 in the team besides a almost 38 years old Ronaldo, not had a CDM at place for a long period of the window (Casemiro came late), and still needed to add 3-4 players on top of that - i would be very surprised with ETHs decision. BUT NOT THAT ONLY - if you for the end told me that we paid 100m euros for him, ignoring a player like Gakpo (who at the time had better stats then him) and at least would cost us half the price - i would honestly question the manager and asked myself why and what made him so sure he would be world class player directly that would take our offense to a new level for sure (you do not pay 100m if you don't believe that that player will have that impact on the team in zero time - or at least in a couple of months. And the end, he got some goals and assist, but i can not come up with one important game where he was the player carrying our offense and now add to that all the issues outside the field and for me its a big failure spending that amount on him. I hope something happens and he gets some kind of new start after this break and starts to show at least some signs of us not being forced to sell him for 10-15m euro to a Bundesliga team or at best for 40m euros to Saudi.

Malacia 4 - To be honest, we needed a back up for Shaw. Shaw has last 2 seasons made the LB position his and we did not bring in Malacia to really fight for the position but more to cover up if needed which was needed. My only question is (because we brought him to team as soon as ETH signed) how much believe ETH has in his future? He must be totally sure that he will develop to a much better player then what he currently is because at the time we had Shaw, Telles, B. Williams and one our biggest talents in the academy A. Fernandez already at place. Even though he was pretty cheap (15m euros?), we still needed all money we could get to fill all bigger gaps in the squad. Not sure what to say about his performances, he is pretty much what you expect from a player coming from Holland for that money - nothing special and i believe all mentioned players would be able to the same job. But because he is blocking Fernandez chances to play i would rather not have signed him.

Onana - 5 I was and still am a huge fan of David De Gea and would sign him NOW so they could both learn from each other, since they lack each others best qualities and we will have 60-70 games hopefully to play, split it on them, 30/30, Onana is also back in his national team so he will be away for some weeks and David does not have that issue. Now to some comments on what we have seen from him so far. I need to say that we lost more then what we gained so far with letting Onana in and David go. For us to benefit maximum or anything really from Onanas strengths, we need to start playing like a team. We need to have control of the ball, have some possession and stop letting the teams get so many open and easy shots on our goal. That starts from us pressing better higher up the field, midfield winning and keeping the ball and defense having control on opponents attackers. We knew that Onana was not the best ball stopper but he has let to many easy goals past him by. He should have saved at least 3-4 goals easily, and so far his passing not directly involved to anything more then our team really not know when to bring the defense line up 15-20 meter or when to drop and let him play libero. I really hope it will sort it self out when we have a stabile and consistent back 4, hopefully AWB-Varane-Martinez-Shaw and that they can get used to Onana and him to them and get to know each other and understand how we want to use Onanas passing. Someone needs to be the "captain" of the back four and decide when to go higher and let Onana pass long, when to drop and play out from the back four or when to drop a CM to carry the ball.

Mount - Not played enough for me to say much here, to early. Can not say that he has showed anything special yet but so has basically not anyone yet.

Reguilón - Have not played enough for a grade yet but so far so good. Like that he already shows commitment and he is for sure our second best choice on the left back. Far better then Malacia.

Amrabat - Can't put a here either. So far he has been what i expected from him, covering a lot of ground, fighting hard, playing with passion, carrying the ball. Can only see him get better, a lot, when he gets to play on his proffered position. I also really believe he will have the same passion and expressing it out loud and clear on the pitch playing for us like Bruno, Martinez etc. I believe that we need more players like that, that shows their commitment for the badge openly on pitch, kissing the patch, screaming out their feelings, firing up the supporters, giving each others a clap on the back or high fives. Bringing some american football "showtime" feelings. I know, from my life, that things like that can make you give the extra % you sometimes have in you without even knowing that. Höjlund is also a player with a lot of feelings and not afraid to show it.

Höjlund - No grade but he has showed more then what i expected. He has impressed me and my feeling is that he will be worth every penny and score 20+ goals in PL on a regular basis at least from season 3 and going forward. After the big money spent on a 20 years old players with so little experience, i can not see anything else that we need to build our attack around him and his abilities for the years to come. He has everything to become a world class number 9.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheimoon
Amrabat and Reguilón I'd add as part of the good batch.
Mount will prove himself before too long to the doubters (I like him already).
Casemiro is brilliant when his legs hold up.
Malacia, Onana, Antony are very underwhelming. Definitely got fleeced on Antony. Probably overpaid on Onana too, although he has to remember how to play keeper at some point.
Overall, Ten Hag's new players have been good and improved the team.

Martinez - 9/10
Eriksen - 8/10
Casemiro - 8/10
Antony - 5/10
Malacia - 3/10
Mount - 7/10
Onana - 5/10
Reguilón - 7/10
Amrabat - 7/10

It's always great to have low standards. Easier to find 'the one'.
 
The proof is in the pudding, and so far the transfer window seems pretty bad, because the results on the pitch have been horrible.

However, I'll reserve judgment on Rasmus, Onana and Amrabat until the end of the season.

Except Mount, he is overrated shite and we got mugged by Chelsea.
 
Yes. Lets face it we arent much better than last season.
 
The proof is in the pudding, and so far the transfer window seems pretty bad, because the results on the pitch have been horrible.

However, I'll reserve judgment on Rasmus, Onana and Amrabat until the end of the season.

Except Mount, he is overrated shite and we got mugged by Chelsea.
On a serious note, has any pudding ever really been bad?