Wednesday at Stoke
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 22,241
- Supports
- Time Travel
He's the las player any team with attacking ambition should be looking for in midfield. He makes McTominay look like Carrick.
Discounting the first 3, legless games, we have conceded 11 goals from open play in the league. We protect our back 4, its set pieces and creativity when Pogba isnt there thats the problem. Rice doesnt solve either of thoseThis is the buy Declan Rice theory and it might be right but there are a few question marks about its validity.
1, All the other players we have tried to play along side Pogba in center midfield have struggled badly to cover the back four. It might be that Fred, McT and Matic are all so bad at it that getting in Rice proves to be the solution . You have to say though that there is also a good chance that the job of covering the space for Pogba just isn't possible.
2, Pogba is probably leaving in the summer, so spending 80+ million pounds right now on a player to get the best out of the 90 million pound player who is likely/wants to bugger off would seem to be a tad too late.
He absolutely isn't worth that kind of money, I don't even want to entertain the idea, but I am not sure what kind of proof of talent do you want to be fair. He isn't and never will be Michael Carrick, but as a CDM destroyer with a solid passing range I think he has demonstrated a good level already and will only improve.True, but age only protects you for a certain amount of time until you need to show proof of talent - something I've never heard or seen from Rice. Shaw was a good scouted purchase back in 20xx and he underperformed/was injured for a while and now is in his bloom.
But I should have said for £80m range people are talking about, he shows nothing but age. At a more realistic £40-50m, I think it would be a good signing, but we need to dump a lot of midfielders for it to make sense: Fred, McT, Jones, Matic, Mata, Lingard (not all, but some) and then decide how we want to build the midfield. I'd love to see a mobile DMF (a mix of McT and Fred, but with improved passing, or a player like Kante, etc) with Pogba. But I feel Rice is technically limited in comparison to his DMF peers on the continent and we'd find the same issues we current have with McFred
I've taken a little more interest in the Irons as they're local to me, and what I've seen of Rice is that he has talent yes, age is on his side, but paying £80m+ for something that we haven't even had a glance of yet is not wise. Unfortunately as usual we need to look to European or African players for that type of player who would have the total skillset and leaner price
No I mean there were posters on here claiming that Shaw was never talented, he was only young and english therfor why we bought him. I am not also saying Rice is as talented, but the kid is playing first team CDM in a PL team, how many seasons in a row? He is clearly talented, but of course not worth 80m pounds.
By adding Rice though you could play Pogba & Bruno together or against top teams you could add a b2b like McTominay alongside him + Bruno or Pogba.I like Rice as a player, but adding another defensive minded midfielder who isn't creative will not be happening this summer.
The price will be so high, I would say he will be going nowhere.
He was good I thought, their best player.What did people think of him yesterday?
I’ll caveat this by saying I don’t think any player is worth 80mIf you were to describe Rice as a player, or his strengths as a player, i.e, covers ground well, protects the back four with good blocks and tackling, and solid enough in possession, does that sound like someone worth £80m?
No it doesn't.
If that's the profile of player you are looking for, it can be obtained at a fraction of the cost elsewhere. These are the simplest qualities required to play in midfield and £80m, even in today's market, should be buying you star men in midfield.
If you were to describe Rice as a player, or his strengths as a player, i.e, covers ground well, protects the back four with good blocks and tackling, and solid enough in possession, does that sound like someone worth £80m?
No it doesn't.
If that's the profile of player you are looking for, it can be obtained at a fraction of the cost elsewhere. These are the simplest qualities required to play in midfield and £80m, even in today's market, should be buying you star men in midfield.
He's not even better than Bissouma.Best DM in the PL imo. Not his best game against us but showed glipses of his class. Reckon he's the player we're looking for.
I agree he seems to have a very good attitude and of course is PL ready, which goes in his favour, but I stand by the point that a player of his profile are quite easy to come by and should be nowhere near £80m in value.I’ll caveat this by saying I don’t think any player is worth 80m
but I think you downplay what you get from him.
First of all you haven’t mentioned his leadership qualities. 2-3 seasons ago we struggled to name 1 leader in the United team.
secondly he’s a much better passer than given credit for.
Thirdly, it would mean the end of mcFred. We could for example play Pogba with Bruno and rice protecting.
the fact that he is proven in the PL against the big teams is a bonus.
his flexibility cb-DCM-cm would allow us more tactical flexibility.
he’s young and improving, he can only get better around better quality players
It's probably still the price because ultimately I imagine WH do not want to sell him. Covid only strengthens their position to hold on, probably.is 80 mill still the number being thrown around. Possibly pre covid they could have asked for that, now, no chance anyone pays anything close to that. They either needs to severely drop their price, or he's staying there for the forseeable. He's a decent player, potential to be very good and he's probably what we need, in that he could play that DM role on his own allowing another more creative player to help out Bruno.
He's not even better than Bissouma.
Hojbjerg is better.Best DM in the PL imo. Not his best game against us but showed glipses of his class. Reckon he's the player we're looking for.
Hojbjerg is better.
He really isn't. You've been swept up by the London hype I'm afraid my good man.Yes he is and comfortably so.
He's not worth the 80m West Ham would demand though.
He really isn't. You've been swept up by the London hype I'm afraid my good man.
There's a reason Chelsea wouldn't touch him with a barge pole when their manager and best player were practically crying for him to join. He's just not all that.
We paid £50 million for Fred and he can't do that! Rice is much better on the ball than Fred.If you were to describe Rice as a player, or his strengths as a player, i.e, covers ground well, protects the back four with good blocks and tackling, and solid enough in possession, does that sound like someone worth £80m?
No it doesn't.
If that's the profile of player you are looking for, it can be obtained at a fraction of the cost elsewhere. These are the simplest qualities required to play in midfield and £80m, even in today's market, should be buying you star men in midfield.
By adding Rice though you could play Pogba & Bruno together or against top teams you could add a b2b like McTominay alongside him + Bruno or Pogba.
or potentially we could see the best of Donnie alongside Bruno with rice protecting them.
so by adding him it’s not necessarily a move that is only defensive
price would be prohibitive though
Overpaying for one player doesn't mean we have to do so again.We paid £50 million for Fred and he can't do that! Rice is much better on the ball than Fred.
The disrespect Rice is getting on this thread after the last game is insane considering he didn't even play badly and looked decent when Moyes decided to actually play football. Not saying he's worth £80 million but I wouldn't be mad at £50 million + Lingard.
Sure, name a decent versionOK, I get that in theory, but you would think that if that was going to work then there would be some signs of it working when we play them with Matic or Fred holding. We play Mc Fred because it didn't look like working at all. I accept Rice is better defensively but is he going to be able to hold down a midfield with Donny and Bruno?
I have my doubts if I am honest.
We would end up playing Rice and Mct and everyone screaming about our lack of creativity for the next five years.
Wouldn't it just be easier to buy a Pogba replacment who is really good with the ball and quick and disciplined enough to play center midfield?
If he moves will more than likely go to Chelsea. Good player with potential to improve. Picks up some decent positions screening the back 4, but would need to improve on his passing range. An upgrade on McTom thats for sure.
Nope, Chelsea refused him last summer.If Lampard was still at Chelsea they'd of signed him this summer.
I’ll caveat this by saying I don’t think any player is worth 80m
but I think you downplay what you get from him.
First of all you haven’t mentioned his leadership qualities. 2-3 seasons ago we struggled to name 1 leader in the United team.
secondly he’s a much better passer than given credit for.
Thirdly, it would mean the end of mcFred. We could for example play Pogba with Bruno and rice protecting.
the fact that he is proven in the PL against the big teams is a bonus.
his flexibility cb-DCM-cm would allow us more tactical flexibility.
he’s young and improving, he can only get better around better quality players
Sure, name a decent version