SquishyMcSquish
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2018
- Messages
- 8,198
- Supports
- Tottenham
Neves is really overrated.
Gets overrated because he scores a couple of worldies a season and is fantastic at the ol' Hollywood pass.
Neves is really overrated.
Massively so. The occasional worldie seems to have more impact than performing well most weeks round here.Neves is really overrated.
Ive seen Neves in the championship and premiership and he hasnt replicated the form he showed in the championship since promotion. Personally I wouldnt bother signing him for Utd.Neves is really overrated.
He played 90 minutes for United U-21s against Rotherham first team away in the EFL Trophy. We won 0-2. His touches.Has anyone seen Garner play against anybody apart from other children?
Neves is really overrated.
Gets overrated because he scores a couple of worldies a season and is fantastic at the ol' Hollywood pass.
Based on what he's shown in the EPL which is backed up by the Wolves fans on their respective forum.Based on what?
From what I have seen over the last 18 months he has been one of the best midfielders in the league, has torn us to shreds a few times.
He's never torn us to shredsBased on what?
From what I have seen over the last 18 months he has been one of the best midfielders in the league, has torn us to shreds a few times.
Longstaff possibly has a higher ceiling and might go for considerably less. But probably won't be available in January.Rice and N’Didi are both at clubs that we should realistically be able to sign players from and would want to come due to seeing it as a step up even in the position we’re in now, both are players that will only get better and fit the type of profile of player we’re going for so I say let’s go all out to sign one (preferably Rice) in January.
Thought that was a pretty good game from him today
I think he’s improving and has started the season well, still on the fence if we should sign him, see how he progresses.
Longstaff possibly has a higher ceiling and might go for considerably less. But probably won't be available in January.
Very true.People seem to be forgetting that he's 20 years old. He's doing incredibly well for his age. For a bit of context, at United, Chong is still deemed too young/not ready for more game time and he's 20 in a couple of months. He's also younger than Rashford and AWB.
People seem to be forgetting that he's 20 years old. He's doing incredibly well for his age. For a bit of context, at United, Chong is still deemed too young/not ready for more game time and he's 20 in a couple of months. He's also younger than Rashford and AWB.
Better passer of the ballHe's basically Eric Dier of two years ago
Eric Dier two years ago was 23 which is still 3 years older than Rice who is still only 20.He's basically Eric Dier of two years ago
Mascherano was 22 when he came over to Europe. So Rice ahead of him at the same age.Forget all that. Is he better than Mascherano at 20? If not I’m not impressed at all.
There really isn't much between them. I'd even say I've been more impressed with Rice from what I've seen of both destroyer type DMs.Not my cup of tea, if we want the pure DM type I'd prefer Ndidi.
Okay, thanks for that. I still don't like him as a footballer.Eric Dier two years ago was 23 which is still 3 years older than Rice who is still only 20.
Rice is developing into a very good DM at 20 years old. He's never gonna be a Pirlo or Carrick type if that's what you prefer. But I think he could as good as or better than Ndidi who is listed as being 22 but it's suspected he might actually be 25.Okay, thanks for that. I still don't like him as a footballer.
There really isn't much between them. I'd even say I've been more impressed with Rice from what I've seen of both destroyer type DMs.
I would prefer a ball player, but it remains to be seen what Ole's strategy is in that regard.For me when the holder isn't offering a tonne on the ball I want the more athletic and agile player of the two, and I feel that is Ndidi, but I don't really want either in truth.
Watched the whole game today. I was impressed. However it's pretty clear he is at the same level - if not below - as Scott. He does have a more commanding ability when dribbling with the ball but no where near the vision, range and intricate ball control that Scott has.
McTominay at 20 wasn't impressing many in our u23 team.Rice is a better player defensively though. I'd agree that Mctominay is better on the ball, but I don't think he is on Rice's level in terms of the defensive side of his game .. which is the most important thing for a player in Rice's role.
McTominay is also 2 years older, which I think has to be taken in to account. What Rice is doing at 20 years old is pretty exceptional and there's so much potential for growth there in a position which, more than most, the mental side of the game is incredibly important.