JoeyJoJoJrShabadoo
Full Member
I still haven't forgiven himand id actually like him
I still haven't forgiven himand id actually like him
Rice and Neves for me would make us challengers.
Is he though? No top PL teams plays like WHUM, he has a huge amount of structure around him and a system that suits his game. The one team that’s as structured and has a similar role albeit playing a different brand of football altogether is City and I doubt anyone on here is mental enough to think he’s better than Fernandinho was or Rodri is.Well if a player is considered one of the best in the world in their position then shouldn't that mean that they are world class?
If Rice is considered to be one of the best in the world in that position then it can be said that he is world class. He is certainly one of the best in the PL in that position but I am not knowledge enough to say he is one of the best in the world, maybe others on here are?
None of these would start for City or Liverpool. Then we have a LB, a CB, a RB, a LW, a RW and a striker that would not start for any of them. How can we challenge with players like Rashford, Sancho, old Ronaldo and all the others. Get real people, this process is going to be long and we are not close to being good enough in most departments.
I still haven't forgiven him
Looking at the stats, Pogba is a beast. Rice is no way worth 80m . We aren't even getting a better player than Bissouma.
Yeah, that was a bit awkward. But Bissouma is actually a fair comparison. I know Bissouma plays box to box but still the defensive contributions are slightly better.It's absolutely mental rating Rice with Pogba and Kovacic
That's like rating Lahm with Ronaldo - completely opposite players.
What Pogba does Rice can't do and what Rice does Pogba can't do.
I genuinely can't believe people don't see the difference between an Anchorman and the creative CM or box to box.
No wonder some people don't rate him, they don't understand what player he is.
Might aswell rate him compared to Bruno Fernandes.
Yeah, that was a bit awkward. But Bissouma is actually a fair comparison. I know Bissouma plays box to box but still the defensive contributions are slightly better.
Thats my problem here. The fact that we are debating about a player who has slightly better or lower stats itself but available for one third of the price - is it really worth it? Im not getting a huge upgrade on Bissouma after spending 80mRice has more (5 higher abilities)
Bissouma has more (4 higher abilities)
- touches in opposition box
- Chances created
- Final 1/3 entries
- Passes in to opposition half
- Aerial duals won
They have similair
- Shots attempted
- Duels won
- Tackles made
- Take ons attempted
- Penalty box entries (bissouma is slightly higher)
- Ball recoveries (Rice has slightly better)
- Interceptions made (Rice has slightly better)
I don't personally see how Bissouma's stats are better than Rice. This is whilst Bissouma plays box to box chasing after the ball to tackle aswell as playing more in a possesion based football with Brighton than West ham do.
Thats my problem here. The fact that we are debating about a player who has slightly better or lower stats itself but available for one third of the price - is it really worth it? Im not getting a huge upgrade on Bissouma after spending 80m
Price is my issue. Plain and simple.
Is he though? No top PL teams plays like WHUM, he has a huge amount of structure around him and a system that suits his game. The one team that’s as structured and has a similar role albeit playing a different brand of football altogether is City and I doubt anyone on here is mental enough to think he’s better than Fernandinho was or Rodri is.
He would get into United’s team, easily, I don’t think he’d get into City, Chelsea or Pool’s and if he did would he really improve them that much? Very good player but not a great one for me.
Nice combo and both could play as number 6 or number 8 giving flexibilityRice and Neves for me would make us challengers.
I think there was. It's probably just ramped up a bit as a result of how the Maguire transfer went.I genuinely love how divisive this is. There wasn't this much opposition to Maguire
Rice and Neves for me would make us challengers.
These piecemeal rebuilds, where we spend outrageous amounts on a couple of players and leave the rest for next summer, are exactly why we are where we find ourselves - fighting for top four after spending half a billion in five years. And not to mention that five years after signing Matic we can't postpone the issue anymore.Yeah I think that's the case.
Some people simply don't care about the money because
- we don't know how much we have
- Because its not really our money to worry about how its being spent either for arguably the richest club in the world
- also we can't buy Bissouma because of his poor humanity
But ultimately some people do care about the money and that's fair I guess. But It's why I find the Maguire to Rice thing a bit off since what about Pogba? He cost us more and arguably can leave us on a free twice- looking like a bad investment just as much as Mbappe may be for PSG if he leaves on a free/doesn't win the CL too.
I wonder how people act if we go and buy our other gaps first like attacking RB, RW, Striker creative CM first -
And then buy Rice the following transfer window. Then the Rice is going to stop us buying other players would be /should be a less of an argument
The Roy Keane comparisons would've been endless.If Rice had stayed Irish, he would be way more affordable
I genuinely love how divisive this is. There wasn't this much opposition to Maguire
Yeah I think that's the case.
Some people simply don't care about the money because
- we don't know how much we have
- Because its not really our money to worry about how its being spent either for arguably the richest club in the world
- also we can't buy Bissouma because of his poor humanity
But ultimately some people do care about the money and that's fair I guess. But It's why I find the Maguire to Rice thing a bit off since what about Pogba? He cost us more and arguably can leave us on a free twice- looking like a bad investment just as much as Mbappe may be for PSG if he leaves on a free/doesn't win the CL too.
I wonder how people act if we go and buy our other gaps first like attacking RB, RW, Striker creative CM first -
And then buy Rice the following transfer window. Then the Rice is going to stop us buying other players would be /should be a less of an argument
This, it's pointless to spend £100m on Rice and start next season without a quality striker and RB and that's exactly what will happen because we all know that the Glazer aren't funding a £200m summer spending spree.I think this has been divisive precisely because of Maguire.
A player coming from a lower ranked team in the league (Leicester, West Ham) who has never played in a top team that is expected to go at the big teams rather than be reactive underdogs and having a massive transfer fee hanging over their head. The parallels in the nature of the transfer are quite obvious. We expected a Van Dijk type of transformative CB when Maguire was signed for a world record defender fee and instead we’ve got a man who looks average at best.
The big issue with Rice is the cost of the transfer. Not that it’s my money, but the club needs to reinforce other positions as well, and there’s been no guarantee shown that if we spend 100 million on one player that there is adequate funding for the other positions that need it. When you take that into account along with the risk of him not being as good as we think he can be, then you can see why there’s a lot of opposition to the idea.
I like Rice. I think he is a good player with the potential to become great. However the risk very much exists that he could end up a Schneiderlin type of flop. Schneiderlin was one of the best defensive midfielders around in the league before we signed him as well. And if he fails, then we’re likely stuck with other positions not having gotten adequate reinforcements either.
I genuinely love how divisive this is. There wasn't this much opposition to Maguire
Nice combo and both could play as number 6 or number 8 giving flexibility
I am not sure so many are saying hes not good, hes very good at what he does. The problem is that the midfield needs more than what he brings, we need more players.There was a huge difference - we badly needed a central defender and there really wasn't that many out there available who looked quality. With a central midfielder I can easily think of 10 midfielders who would seriously strengthen us - even if Rice would be my first choice. And I can buy the argument that he will be too expensive considering we need to strengthen several areas - but when people say Rice ISN'T pure quality - they know very little about football. The thought of him at Liverpool scares me to death.
I had doubts over him, especially around mobility. They are still there to an extent so why pairing him with a more mobile player would help. I think otherwise Neves game has progressed this seasonIt is isnt it? Im not getting the Neves hate on here Geebs. He is already proven in the league. I think both solidify the midfield.
I had doubts over him, especially around mobility. They are still there to an extent so why pairing him with a more mobile player would help. I think otherwise Neves game has progressed this season
None of these would start for City or Liverpool. Then we have a LB, a CB, a RB, a LW, a RW and a striker that would not start for any of them. How can we challenge with players like Rashford, Sancho, old Ronaldo and all the others. Get real people, this process is going to be long and we are not close to being good enough in most departments.
I think this has been divisive precisely because of Maguire.
A player coming from a lower ranked team in the league (Leicester, West Ham) who has never played in a top team that is expected to go at the big teams rather than be reactive underdogs and having a massive transfer fee hanging over their head. The parallels in the nature of the transfer are quite obvious. We expected a Van Dijk type of transformative CB when Maguire was signed for a world record defender fee and instead we’ve got a man who looks average at best.
The big issue with Rice is the cost of the transfer. Not that it’s my money, but the club needs to reinforce other positions as well, and there’s been no guarantee shown that if we spend 100 million on one player that there is adequate funding for the other positions that need it. When you take that into account along with the risk of him not being as good as we think he can be, then you can see why there’s a lot of opposition to the idea.
I like Rice. I think he is a good player with the potential to become great. However the risk very much exists that he could end up a Schneiderlin type of flop. Schneiderlin was one of the best defensive midfielders around in the league before we signed him as well. And if he fails, then we’re likely stuck with other positions not having gotten adequate reinforcements either.
I am not even sure Rashford would make the bench.You really think Rashford and Sancho wouldn't start for City or Liverpool? Liverpool were interested in Sancho. Sancho was one of the most coveted young English players before we signed him. Chelsea and Liverpool wanted him
Just as well because he’d cost significantly more than that.Looking at the stats, Pogba is a beast. Rice is no way worth 80m . We aren't even getting a better player than Bissouma.
Based on ?I am not even sure Rashford would make the bench.
I am not even sure Rashford would make the bench.
Their better players.Based on ?
His profile is not that good.That's hilarious. An English international of his profile will make the bench at the very least of every top PL club. Firmino plays at Liverpool ffs and they've kept him on through bad spells of form