Couldn’t have gotten that more wrong, no-one wanted a fancy foreigner at all, certainly not after Veron. You’ve absolutely pulled that outta your arse.
They wanted a big hard Keano replacement and that’s why there was so much negativity about Carrick, despite his obvious talent.
And so because some utter baboons who wanted a destroyer* back in the mid 00’s rather than a technically gifted playmaker who was incredible at shielding, *unsurprisingly after coming from Keane, Ince, Robson; this might be the same?
These people were proven so wrong by our best ever spell in Europe with the technically excellent DM.
Rice is the opposite of Carrick, back to the destroyer type, yet with none of the ability of Keane, Ince or Robbo, shite on the ball, can’t dictate. If you want a comparison with this signing and the ones who want it, don’t look at a completely different type of player, look no further than Schneiderlin.
Here was a typical call on Carrick, by our Red Indian Chief:
The same stupid hard man argument is repeated all these years later by some in here. We need a Carrick, not some limited football who’s big and strong. Safe to say, all those against signing Carrick back then, would 100% all have taken Rice over him so it’s a daft comparison.