We need an rvn
Full Member
more like Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear as his rubber never loses grib.They really missed a trick with him.
more like Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear as his rubber never loses grib.They really missed a trick with him.
Just sign the contract ffs.Lays - Eat it, grow fat
or
Lays - You eat it, I don't
or
Just buy feckin Lays will ya.
It means he realises the PR potential of the marketing beast that is Manchester United.Damn what does it mean!
No, They eat patatas fritas.they eat crisps in Madrid don't they?
Worth it. That would be about £350k/week.
And we wouldn't have to spunk £50M+ on replacing him.
Good deal Woodie. Get it done.
It's awesome having the best #1 and #2 in the league.
How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
Of all the ridiculous salaries and extensions we’ve handed out in recent years, this is not the one to take issue with.How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
If we had a great team I wouldn’t have a problem.Of all the ridiculous salaries and extensions we’ve handed out in recent years, this is not the one to take issue with.
You are assuming that the money we save by letting De Gea go will be better utilized elsewhere and it will drastically improve our team in a way that we would not need another De Gea to be our keeper.If we had a great team I wouldn’t have a problem.
How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
I don’t get why you have a problem now?If we had a great team I wouldn’t have a problem.
But this is what makes a great team, signing the great players to new contracts...If we had a great team I wouldn’t have a problem.
We just need to get lukaku and Sanchez off because our wage bill is going to be so high if these deal goes through. Lukaku on 250 and Sanchez on 315 now dea gea on 350..wow.You are assuming that the money we save by letting De Gea go will be better utilized elsewhere and it will drastically improve our team in a way that we would not need another De Gea to be our keeper.
I didn’t say I want to let go of de gea, I’m just saying can’t we do it some other way we’re we pay a signing bonus and give him like 200k so that there is space for other future stars. The wage bill is going through the roof if this deal goes through.But this is what makes a great team, signing the great players to new contracts...
He's been our best player for close to 5 years now. The best player regardless of position should be on the best wages. If anyone else wants to join us on better wages they need to demonstrate that their contribution to our success will be more than DDGs.How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
Because he's been our most important player for years and yet we're paying Sanchez significantly more. I know if my company hired someone who was worse than me but they were earning more I'd be pissed offHow can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
£90 for 5 season is absolutely feck all for the amount of points he brings to the team. £150m over 5 years and I wouldn;t give a shit to be fair.I didn’t say I want to let go of de gea, I’m just saying can’t we do it some other way we’re we pay a signing bonus and give him like 200k so that there is space for other future stars. The wage bill is going through the roof if this deal goes through.
Better yet we can do it the city way and pay him off the books.
Blasphemy! Somebody ban this guy!How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
Well, you have to subtract from the equation the money we would get from De Gea's sale, but in principle you are right. Do not see how any other solution bar extending his contract is the right one.Considering that he's already on a reported £200k/w deal it's an additional outlay of £150k/w which is roughly £40m over five years. Buying an inferior goalkeeper, who would presumably be on similar wages to de Gea's current, would cost us a minimum of £75m considering what other keepers brought into the league have cost. In terms of on-pitch performance and financially, it's an absolute no-brainer.
How can a goalie be on 350k per week when we need a rebuilding job? How do we always end up in these situations. I love de gea to death but there’s just something off about these figures especially considering he’s a goalkeeper.
if you take a moment to read further down the thread you will realize I don't actually want him gone. How did you even come to that conclusion just because I said 350k for a goalie is insane which it actually is?So in your mind - the start of a good rebuilding job is letting him go cheaply (because of his contract), get a much worse goalkeeper for almost twice the amount - and save … say .. £150.000 a week in wages?
Lets for sake of argument say we sell him for £30 million and buy a new goalkeeper for £50 million. We will get a worse goalkeeper and over a 5 year period we will save a total of £25 million because of his lower wages.
In what world is that good ?
Because if we don't pay him whatever he wants (maybe 350k or maybe 300k), he will leave.if you take a moment to read further down the thread you will realize I don't actually want him gone. How did you even come to that conclusion just because I said 350k for a goalie is insane which it actually is?