Toblerone92
Full Member
I assume that the comment was sarcasm. I at least hope that it was.
I would imagine so but I’m still taking the bait.
I assume that the comment was sarcasm. I at least hope that it was.
Very very predictable.
Koeman refused to play the 2nd half.Negative Deschamps gets what he wants.
Can't be serious.Acceptable result, but Taylor robbed us. Feck you Taylor.
They should bring in bonus points for 4 goals in the pool stage matches to try and rid us of this miserable scourge of cowardly and conservative international managers
Atwell robbed themCan't be serious.
Rabiot has been fantastic in the world cup as well, excellent player.Rabiot has to be one of the most adaptable midfielders in the world. Very underrated on this forum.
I assume that the comment was sarcasm. I at least hope that it was.
I would imagine so but I’m still taking the bait.
Acceptable result, but Taylor robbed us. Feck you Taylor.
I’d compare it to when a player knocks the ball past a defender and then gets bought down. It’s a penalty regardless of if the player would have been able to get the ball before it went out for a goal kick or not.
Dumfries was stood beside him, not in his sight and Maignan never even saw the ball coming. 1 Dumfries, 10 Dumfries or no Dumfries, he was never going to save that.Koeman refused to play the 2nd half.
Can't be serious.
You can't tell that at all. As the ball leaves Simon's foot, Maignan is literally leaning over towards the side the ball went. The Dutch 22 is in front of him and to the side, meaning it's possible he had at least a peripheral awareness of him, and he then he ends up straightening up and standing because there's a massive man in an orange shirt between him and where he needs to dive.
As you said originally, it was an easy decision to make and that's because you can't stand a player next to the keeper and claim he's not in the way of shots going that side of the goal.
Both teams looked poor
But him just being there is a distraction to the keeper. Doesn’t matter if he’d have saved it or not. All the BBC pundits reckon it was harsh and I genuinely believe they’d be saying it was right if it happened in an England game that benefited us.That's completely different. You're talking about a foul in the box which is a pen.
This is about whether he interfered. It's a contentious one and the pundits I'm watching can't agree either.
They were both happy with a draw, I think.
It's fairly easy to tell it from the replay where you see where his focus is. He steps to the left as a natural reaction, but his balance is awkward and there's no chance he can actually jump to any side, and he literally only looks to the side after the ball has gone in.
Not that it really matters, because according to the rules it's offside.
But him just being there is a distraction to the keeper. Doesn’t matter if he’d have saved it or not. All the BBC pundits reckon it was harsh and I genuinely believe they’d be saying it was right if it happened in an England game that benefited us.
But him just being there is a distraction to the keeper. Doesn’t matter if he’d have saved it or not. All the BBC pundits reckon it was harsh and I genuinely believe they’d be saying it was right if it happened in an England game that benefited us.
The useless Stuart Atwell.Wasn't Taylor tbf. It's whoever was in that VAR box.
So you could says he’s Given it?Shay Given says it's a good goal.
The keeper was off balance and doesn't even attempt a dive as he wasn't in a position to do so. I don't think he prevented him from challenging for the ball as he wasn't doing that anyway.
That's the thing, he can't without launching himself into Xavi's legs.
Tchouameni is there because he is a strong body. Otherwise he is useless in terms of ball progressionI don’t understand the Tchouameni hype. He looks a distant third best in a midfield with Rabiot and an older Kante. Rabiot did have a solid game though.
Given remembers HenryShay Given says it's a good goal.
France are tactically light-years ahead of England, even if not pretty to watch.France’s tactics aren't any better than England in the sense of hoping for moments of individual quality. They get over the line more often than not because of Mbappe.
It's fairly easy to tell it from the replay where you see where his focus is. He steps to the left as a natural reaction, but his balance is awkward and there's no chance he can actually jump to any side, and he literally only looks to the side after the ball has gone in.
Not that it really matters, because according to the rules it's offside.
Deschamps plays the players in their correct position mostly. Our players are just in terrible form overall.France are tactically light-years ahead of England, even if not pretty to watch.
Netherlands did the right thing in closing the shop as they would've been killed if they opened any space. France play now the weakest team in the group while Netherlands will have to wrestle with a very impressive Austria.
Physically stop? I’d argue simply being there and being another thing to consider for the keeper might have prevented him from diving for it. Like I said before, the keeper would have to also consider the player getting a touch on it so he might not have wanted to fully commit. We could argue forever but my main frustration lies with the player not getting back on side in time. The Dutch are my best chance at seeing something positive in this Euros so would have loved a win there.Being a distraction isn't in the rules. He had to prevent the keeper from challenging for the ball which I don't think he was doing anyway.
I saw Pogba lose his mind trying to play in a two man midfield with him a while ago and I don’t think he’s progressed since.Tchouameni is there because he is a strong body. Otherwise he is useless in terms of ball progression