I think its obvious I'm not saying there's never been a single incident of cheating in Rugby or Ice hockey or anyother team sport.
But cheating, faking injury to get your opponent punished etc, this is just normal now. Happens every game.
Fist fights aren't cheating. You can dislike it but it's not the ridiculous stuff we see in football.
I'm amazed anyone can defend today's game in this sense.
Okay, let me take the time to respond more thoroughly.
The rugby example you brought up; I haven't got a clue - I've never heard of the two individuals you mention, and for that matter I couldn't name a single rugby player, dead or alive. In other words, I know nothing about Rugby. Which of course makes me realise I was rash in arguing this sort of thing happens in every contact team sport. It happens in any contact team sport I know anything about.
However, I do know a bit about ice hockey, and I don't think you do if you imagine that industrial grade shithousery doesn't occur on a regular basis in hockey. There are top players who have that as a key part of their image and identity - such as Esa Tikkanen, who was famous for his effectiveness in tight marking of the opposition's top players, in no small part through unnerving and constant nattering at them in Finnish. Trash talk is endemic, and no one frowns on attempts to put opponents off their game through more or less any means available. This is of course also a sport where it's considered perfectly normal (at least in North America) to respond to completely legal tackles by attempting to beat up the player delivering the tackle. You'll get sent to the penalty box for it, but no one would suggest it shows a lack of professionalism.
Now, football. My main point here is there's many ways to do football. There's the picture-perfect one, with players delivering superb displays of skill while sticking to the rules and behaving with mutual respect and courtesy. That football can and does exist. But it's not the only kind, and ultimately football, like every team sport, rewards those who win. And "professionalism" in effect means possesing the qualities that make that happen. If that means not playing it nice, then a top professional does not play it nice. There's risk to it - fouls, yellows, reds, the possibility of stoking the opposition morale rather than sapping it - but ultimately that's a question of calculation, not professionalism. As in hockey, there are great players who have made their careers to a considerable extent on their ability to exploit that space (Italy's CBs in the 70s and 80s,, for example - Gentile, Scirea etc). Every team with ambition want that kind of player.
It may not be the most attractive kind of football, but there's always going to be a gray zone, and it's really up to refs and federations to set and enforce its limits. If one team resorts to that approach and the other team doesn't respond in kind, then you're always going to sympathise with the latter and expect the ref to ensure it doesn't pay. But the Dutch
did respond in kind, and it looked very much to me like they were a better team for it. They needed that spark, and thrived on it. Sometimes a game just goes in that direction. That's about competitive fire and determination, and for my part I don't think that's either unprofessional or boring. And it
really doesn't happen that much in football. I have to say I think you have a pretty weak case arguing that this is something that football has infected other sports with.