prateik
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 42,505
Fletch certainly will be.
Like Berbatov? Veron?
Instead of inexperienced youth like Ronaldo and Rooney?
Don't tell me Obama is signing! Thank feck for that! Finally, changes we can believe in!! Woo hoo!!
Your delibrately missing my point. Its obvious we need experience in the team at the present time. We had youth last year and Scholes and Giggs arent getting any younger, would be a perfect time to bed them in.
I will be very surprised if we dont have a "name" particular in midfield join us before next season.
Baines, Kagawa, Asamoah.
muppet suicide.
Missing experience?
Evra
Vidic
Rio
Evans
Carrick
Nani
Valencia
Rooney
And that's not mentioning Giggs, Scholes and Fletcher, or the likes of Berbatov and Park.
Berbatov and Park are likely to be out of the club before the start of next season. Also, out of your list (not including Giggs and Scholes whos roles and gametime are uncertain next season) you have named one CM in Carrick. Thanks for listing the team out for me, it saved me looking on the website *sigh*
I can see I'm fighting a losing battle here so lets just wait and see.
You claimed we were missing experience, don't understand how anyone can claim that.
Might do. For years, all the pundits have been telling us how far on the left wing he is, but every time I see him, he's squarely in the middle of the pitch. I just wonder whether he's not too defensive to pair well with Carrick. He makes some good runs, and he makes the odd outside shot now and then, and he can distribute well if given a bit of room by the opposition, but I do wonder how creative he can really be.
Experience particularly in the central midfield area and also a real need to sign established players. Of course we should still develop youth like we have always done but we desperately need players who have bought the t-shirt to give the team (and fans) a much needed lift and send out a message. Like I said if this doesnt happen I'll be surprised so let us both have this conversation in August to see who was right.
If you read Fergie's comments today don't expect experience top players.. We wont be in the market for them.
The 80 mil from Ronaldo's sale for Naymar please. 60 for the transfer and 20 for his wages.
Thanks.
Some of you are embarrassing thundercunts. Ever since 2005 it's been an annual theme that we mock united's ambition and transfer strategy. Every so often we spend a shit load of money, including the best part of £55m last summer and yet it's as if it never happened. What did you want gill to say? He just told the truth. We have got funds and we will be buying players. It's utter retardation to think otherwise. I'm embarrassed that some people continue to peddle this line and denigrate people at the club. Does a club with no money decide to spend £11m on a new medical centre or £10m buying up bits of land in the area? Does a club with no money commit to gashing £24m on nasri before he fecked us off for an extra £70k a week? Even with the debt we turn over £30-40m cash profit. We should have more money but we aren't skint. There is clearly money to be spent and I suggest a big chunk will be committed in the next few weeks. It's not about signing the most expensive players, it's about getting the best. We've got a better squad than last season and will be stronger again next year. Stop whining. Rant over.
Obama isn't signing. Right now he's out hunting down Bin Laden's successor. God help the sucker when Obama catches up with him.
Scholes and Fletch will be like 2 new signings.
Some of you are embarrassing thundercunts. Ever since 2005 it's been an annual theme that we mock united's ambition and transfer strategy. Every so often we spend a shit load of money, including the best part of £55m last summer and yet it's as if it never happened. What did you want gill to say? He just told the truth. We have got funds and we will be buying players. It's utter retardation to think otherwise. I'm embarrassed that some people continue to peddle this line and denigrate people at the club. Does a club with no money decide to spend £11m on a new medical centre or £10m buying up bits of land in the area? Does a club with no money commit to gashing £24m on nasri before he fecked us off for an extra £70k a week? Even with the debt we turn over £30-40m cash profit. We should have more money but we aren't skint. There is clearly money to be spent and I suggest a big chunk will be committed in the next few weeks. It's not about signing the most expensive players, it's about getting the best. We've got a better squad than last season and will be stronger again next year. Stop whining. Rant over.
It's always been the same RR. In the '70s we heard the same rants from the same type of 'supporter', then the '80s and the '90s. I remember at one time we were doing stadium improvements and all the supporters wanted were new players. At the time Edwards, who was been slagged off by 'fans' and was a little sick of it all said "One day you'll thank me for this" but there was no respect for what the club was doing.
Getting Fletcher back and getting him back to his best are two very different things.
Fletch at his best though will do serious damage to that City side. They definitely won't have it as easy in the middle.
I don't think the rap is that we have no money - its that we don't seem to have the money to compete at the top end of the transfer market like we used to. In other words, the kind of talent we used to be top competitors for now tends to be too expensive for us either in terms of market value or wages. It is likely, though, that we'll see serious investment this summer proving our changing behavior in the market didn't mean much after all, but let's not pretend that it hasn't changed. Its an uncomfortable thing to accept, yes, and it seems to me that you set up and rant at straw arguments in order to insulate yourself from that.
Yes I agree Dev. Its increasingly looking like Fergie is expecting Fletch's return to be like a new signing. If by chance we keep Pogba then that will be another player in the mix. I suppose having Anderson and Cleverly healthy will have a similar effect. That's four players who didn't play much this year, potentially being available next season. So the prospects of buying another player be pushed to next summer when Scholes and Giggs are likely to retire.
De Gea, Linde
rafael, smalling, evans, rio, bida, evra
valencia, nani, young, andow, clev, carrick, fletch, scholes, giggs
rooney, chico, welbeck
Did I miss anyone?
Thats 20 players over 21.
Assumptions:
Koosh, Berba, Owen, Park leave.
Amos, Fabio go out on loan
Fletch returns.
No pressing need for a central midfielder if Fletcher is back and ready. (still need the creativity from central positions.. someone like Kagawa), but if there is someone we have an eye on and is available, I think we'll move in for him regardless.
There is space in the squad. And phasing Giggs/Scholes out isnt really much of a problem.. by that I mean they understand their role and it wont be a problem like Lampard.
I have a feeling Owen might get a new contract to be the 4th choice experienced striker after Berba leaves.. I'd rather keep Berba, but he deserves more games.. Owen with his injuries probably expects to be a squad player.
Which in my opinion is a big mistake and we'll again be tempting fate once again. Relying on 39 yr olds and injury prone players like Ando whose yet to show any consistency in his game is risky to say the least.
Oh well...one way or another the Glazer's debt must be paid.
We've never been able to compete at the top end of the transfer market.
I don't think SAF is relying on one player. The general sentiment is that he was unlucky with injuries to Anderson, Cleverly, and the Fletcher's illness. If you add those three as healthy additions, plus Scholes, it would be too crowded buy anyone unless some one exceptional become available, which I doubt.
Its funny how all roads lead to Anderson. Whether SAF has faith in him to blossom come the new season. I think our purchase may depend on that.
I agree in giving Fletch a year or two to try to resurrect his career. After all he's been a loyal servant for us and giving him a free transfer now would ruin his career for good. I may also understand in keeping Giggs and Scholes for another year altough to be honest, I would have rather kept one of them and brought someone else). However, please don't come up with Owen. The man is a wreck and he's a Liverpool legend (ie no moral debt to be paid towards him). Id rather see us give a chance to Keane or even Macheda then him.
I'm not desperate for him to stay.. but if Fergie decides we need experience on the cheap.. and someone as a 4th choice should Keane go out on loan, it might just happen.
I too would rather see Keane or Kiko, but Kiko's loan deals havent worked out. He probably is no closer to the first team that he was last season. Keane might stay around for the first half and then be loaned out in Jan.. Fergie does that.
Good chance Owen goes.. but him staying wouldnt shock me either.
If we're losing Berba, then I would imagine Owen will stay unless Will Keane is brought up permanently, in which case it would be the end of Macheda as well.
I dont see any wisdom of keeping a player whose rarely available (and hardly good anymore). Experience is needed on the pitch and not in the treatment room.
Not only that. But you have to adapt to circumstances. We're never going to be able to compete with oligarchs and price owned clubs. And I think that's exactly was SAF is doing.