arnie_ni
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
- Messages
- 15,712
Hard to tell. Don't think he did there
I’ll take a flawed DDG over 99% of the goalies in the world.Well no but he has a load of obvious flaws in his game. A good example today when he had to compete for a high ball with Ryan short arse Fraser - with no other players within 20 yards of them - and opted for a panicky punch towards touch.
Well no but he has a load of obvious flaws in his game. A good example today when he had to compete for a high ball with Ryan short arse Fraser - with no other players within 20 yards of them - and opted for a panicky punch towards touch.
Could have, or alternatively he could have done what dubravka did against Sancho who Did fumble it after trying to catch it, and nearly cost them a goal. The punch was a good shout imo, and worked out as Fraser did nothing to challenge for the ball.
I certainly don’t think we should replace him with Dubravka. I also think there’s at least 10 other keepers in the league who would have comfortably caught that ball.
How many keepers would have made that other save from SM and the other one round the post?
This. I can't believe that people still bringing that shit up.I’ll take a flawed DDG over 99% of the goalies in the world.
People are absolutely right when they say that over a long run a more well-rounded keeper will prevent more goals and add more to the team than De Gea. But that doesn't mean there aren't extended periods where De Gea can compensate with shot-stopping alone.
The sheer natural talent of this guy is something else. I wonder if more could have been done to develop the weaker areas of his game post-SAF if we hadn't been such a mess.
Seconded.I would rather have him as captain than Maguire. Always talks well, doesn't make excuses for shite performances and he actually seems to give a damn.
Stats backing what the eye-test would probably tell us anyway: his usual flaws remain but for the first season in several years his shot-stopping is more than compensating for it.
Just came to post this. A great thread, which largely supports what meets the eye, although I cannot help but feel that De Gea’s weaknesses to have a greater net negative contribution than what this analysis would suggest.
You likely read too many posts of John Harrison. This fella doesn’t like de Gea at allMy concern would moreso be that his current shot-stopping form is a lot less sustainable than just being decent at chance prevention would be.
You likely read too many posts of John Harrison. This fella doesn’t like de Gea at all
Came off his line at the start of the game to claim a cross and missed it and got a whack
That was it for the rest of the game, on his line as balls consistently got put into the 6 yard area
I’d like to see GK Twitter thread guy include range and accuracy of passing in his stats. I suspect this is another metric where DDG is miles below par. When we signed him that was supposed to be one of his best attributes but he’s regressed horribly and seems to be one of the worst keepers in the league with the ball at his feet. And, just like sweeping, this is one of the most important qualities for a keeper who plays for one of the stronger teams in the league.
Passes Completed (Launched) | 4.14 | 10 |
---|---|---|
Passes Attempted (Launched) | 9.58 | 9 |
Pass Completion Percentage (Launched) | 43.2% | 60 |
Passes Attempted | 16.16 | 1 |
Throws Attempted | 3.19 | 11 |
Launch% | 37.9% | 38 |
Average Pass Length | 35.5 | 33 |
Goal Kicks | 7.72 | 60 |
Launch% (Goal Kicks) | 44.8% | 27 |
Avg. Length of Goal Kicks | 39.1 | 28 |
If I weren't a United fan I would enjoy him being sold and replaced by the likes of Henderson or some other more experienced, better and "modern" keeper, just to see some of your reactions
Gladly I'm...
What do you want? Him to prevent the goals or to have a better passing %? That's not his job
Maguire is good with a ball ain't he, that's why we brought him and gave him the armband
Used fbref to try and answer my own question.
I’m not fully sure about what all this means but it certainly looks as though he might be as useless at kicking the ball as I feared. Numbers in right hand column are centiles as compared to peers. It’s kind of staggering a club with our ambitions is willing to stick with a keeper who is so much worse than GKs at other clubs by so many metrics.
Fecking 1st centile for passes attempted! Christ on a bike…
Passes Completed (Launched) 4.14 10Passes Attempted (Launched) 9.58 9Pass Completion Percentage (Launched) 43.2% 60Passes Attempted 16.16 1Throws Attempted 3.19 11Launch% 37.9% 38Average Pass Length 35.5 33Goal Kicks 7.72 60Launch% (Goal Kicks) 44.8% 27Avg. Length of Goal Kicks 39.1 28
All that means is that we're not passing the ball back to him a lot, because why would we, and why is that necessarily a bad thing?
He has 98% and 96% pass completion on short and medium passes. Number of passes attempted tells you how many he, uh, attempted. Doesn't say a thing about his success rate.
It’s necessarily a bad thing when it’s such a massive outlier. There will be plenty of other teams that don’t need to pass the ball back to their keeper very often but when 99% of goalkeepers attempt more passes each game then we obviously have a problem. Either the defenders don’t trust him or he doesn’t trust himself. Both scenarios are not good.
Why not?
Rangnick has even said that he prefers his keepers to have as few touches as possible. Even keepers who might be better with their feet than De Gea will still comfortably still be the weakest player technically on the team, so why give the keeper the ball more than you have to?