TheReligion
Abusive
They’re both on 9 this season. Nunez in 19 appearances and Rashford in 20. Both on 3 assists.
Ahh you’re including the Charity Shield
Fair enough!
They’re both on 9 this season. Nunez in 19 appearances and Rashford in 20. Both on 3 assists.
Not being worse than our striking options isn’t that much of a point to make. I know, I know but a fit Martial is miles better than. Nunez and even then we wouldn’t be getting Nunez on a free. Would he get in front of a 38 year old Ronaldo? Yes. Would anybody go for him for 85m or whatever you spent on him? Of course not.Nunez has started to play from the left as well but position is irrelevant. The question is whether United would take him, and right now he doesn’t seem to be any worse than your current striking options.
Rashford looks good now but he’s had a very up and down career and is two years older. From what I’ve read on here, he can frustrate with his decision making in the final third.
Martial is injury prone and you don’t really have anyone else. I’m not sure what your chance creation is like compared to ours but ETH seems to have you trying to play on the front foot and creating chances. Nunez would probably get a decent number of chances at United.
I mean it counts in the scoring charts everywhere you look online. No different to scoring in a Super Cup or World Club Cup game.Ahh you’re including the Charity Shield
Fair enough!
They’re both on 9 this season. Nunez in 19 appearances and Rashford in 20. Both on 3 assists.
Yeah I don’t disagree. I think we overpaid as well because of desperation to get someone in to replace Mane.Rashford has three goals in the World Cup though. I don't think the point is so much to compare Nunez output to Rashford, but more compare it to the price Liverpool paid.
In the age of football meme'ing, an expensive player will always get a hard time for putting up lots of misses. The good thing for Liverpool is that his head hasn't dropped, and he continues to put himself about. He could still turn out to be a useful player, but I don't think he will ever be that deadly striker that needs just one chance in a big game. It certainly looks like Liverpool have overpaid.
I mean it counts in the scoring charts everywhere you look online. No different to scoring in a Super Cup or World Club Cup game.
Yeah I don’t disagree. I think we overpaid as well because of desperation to get someone in to replace Mane.
He can still become a very good player for us though. Sadly big money signings don’t have the luxury of time.
He spends most years telling us how everybody else is better than we are and how they’re going to win every game until the end of time because of it.
Yep Nunez couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo.....but he's a disruptor. I'm not gonna explain that but you know what I mean. And now the feckers are getting Gapko as well? That's shit for us. Proper shit.Not being worse than our striking options isn’t that much of a point to make. I know, I know but a fit Martial is miles better than. Nunez and even then we wouldn’t be getting Nunez on a free. Would he get in front of a 38 year old Ronaldo? Yes. Would anybody go for him for 85m or whatever you spent on him? Of course not.
How many chances and positions can the man waste before certain people wake up to him? It’s extremely difficult to he consistent with a man like that. A man who has nothing outside of scoring goals and even struggles to do that.
Every fanbase has players like these. We talked up Lukaku and even Pogba despite their deficiencies. Chelsea had Lukaku and Morata with his goals per minute stats and shite like that. Even City fans were defending Grealish and his habit of slllllooowwwing the game waaaay down. If you do get Gakpo or another striker in the summer you’ll be relieved at selling him for 30m to Atletico. It just takes time to realise that. Hell add Maguire to our list!
Ahh, second season Tevez.Yep Nunez couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo.....but he's a disruptor. I'm not gonna explain that but you know what I mean. And now the feckers are getting Gapko as well? That's shit for us. Proper shit.
I am not surprised with the outcome. Not that I won't be surprised if at any point he starts improving and he will start scoring a couple of goals, but even Klopp was aware of his technical limitations I guess?
Me as a casual fan who watched him at Benfica only from the last 15 years from South American strikers in our league rated more Falcão, Hulk (not exactly a striker) Lisandro Lopez, Oscar Cardozo, Jackson Martinez, and I won't go with the Slimani or Bas Dost (not South Americans) stuff because Benfica posters might think I am taking the piss with them. Wouldn't trade him by Liedson anyway, that's how good I think he is.
Who was the guy who compared him with Diego Forlan? That one when didn't scored at least had class inside and outside the pitch. Darwin? He looks Ben Johnson full on steroids doing a 100 m sprint fighting with the ball and a couple of seconds later he discovers he was offside...
Good Lord, sometimes Klopp isn't as smart as he likes to show he is, isn't it?
Yeah forgot Taremi, much better football overall but TBF with Darwin he is athletically more suited to the game in England and much younger.I think you and I have been the consistent Portuguese league viewers who have been banging this drum. You are spot on with regard to the forwards in recent years who are clearly better - Slimani and Bas Dost included despite not being South American, and for me Mehdi Tahremi as well pretty comfortably.
Somewhere earlier in this thread someone tried to tell me that Darwin was better than Cavani ever had been which was beyond absurd.
Yeah forgot Taremi, much better football overall but TBF with Darwin he is athletically more suited to the game in England and much younger.
I do feel at a certain point he will get it right, but as a footballer he is behind Suarez, Cavani or Forlan for Uruguay.
No doubt about that.
What makes me laugh is that I am detecting a pattern here regarding Klopp, first he plays vs Porto, Diaz plays well let’s sign him, the same thing with Darwin later.For me until he learns how to pass he will always be an extremely limited footballer. The kind of guy you want to bring on with 15 minutes left. I just don't ever see him being influential at the highest level of the sport unless his passing improves by several orders of magnitude.
Still beating this statistical drum without context.They’re both on 9 this season. Nunez in 19 appearances and Rashford in 20. Both on 3 assists.
What makes me laugh is that I am detecting a pattern here regarding Klopp, first he plays vs Porto, Diaz plays well let’s sign him, the same thing with Darwin later.
It’s impossible they didn’t detected those issues before, this guys probably even knew him before he played 2 seasons for Benfica.
Probably Klopp has such a confidence level on his methods that he thinks he can improve any player, this one really will be curious to follow…
Rashford scored 5 in 32 last season.Still beating this statistical drum without context.
How many chances has Nunez had to score 9 goals compared to Rashford?
It's a stupid comparison just using apps and goals. There's a lot more to it than that
Edit. Checked the stats, 12.5% conversion rate for Nunez, 18.18% for Rashford.
Rashford is significantly more deadly in front of goal this season so far, he just doesn't get the same amount of chances
Wow, that singing was out if the blue, Luis Diaz-equeu.Doesn’t bode well for him if klopp is replacing him with gakpo within 6 months.
Hedging bets 101I am not surprised with the outcome. Not that I won't be surprised if at any point he starts improving and he will start scoring a couple of goals
Yea i thought so too but they just reached an agreement for Gakpo at 37mil.I’m glad Liverpool blew their transfer budget on him. Made a few odd signings since Edwards left and they overpaid here by roughly double.
Rashford scored 5 in 32 last season.
He’s having a better season right now but only marginally. He’s two years older that Núñez as well.
His price ultimately doesn’t make it worth it for United. You’re crying out for a goal scorer though.
To be fair, you'd replace him with an inform Andy Carroll if the opportunity arose.Doesn’t bode well for him if klopp is replacing him with gakpo within 6 months.
And we have no idea how that will work out yet or if he's even worth it. I remember when they signed that Asian lad for £7m and this place was in absolute uproar: "Why are Liverpool so much better than us at transfers!", even the press was saying it's a smart deal, only Klopp can find these players. Turns out they're just not good enough, which is why they get a complete free run when it comes down to actually making a bid.Yea i thought so too but they just reached an agreement for Gakpo at 37mil.
Silent domination is backThe faintest of faint praise.
Diaz was scouted extensively and signed with thr nerds stamp of approval. Darwin was scouted by Klopp and his staff in preparation for the games, the nerds advised against signing him, and Klopp just overruled them. Liverpool just had probably their worst transfer window in years and it was the first time they let Klopp be in charge of itWhat makes me laugh is that I am detecting a pattern here regarding Klopp, first he plays vs Porto, Diaz plays well let’s sign him, the same thing with Darwin later.
It’s impossible they didn’t detected those issues before, this guys probably even knew him before he played 2 seasons for Benfica.
Probably Klopp has such a confidence level on his methods that he thinks he can improve any player, this one really will be curious to follow…