poleglass red
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2015
- Messages
- 3,792
Puts everything into perspective really, at the end of the day it's just a game.
Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.Honestly you have Zero evidence to back up that statement. Martial has all the talent but zero application
Bullshit.Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
That’s clearly nonsenseMartial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English
Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
Can you get technically better at dribbling at the age of 21? I’m not so sure, he’s going to spend an awful lot of time getting knocked on his arse in the PL.
Can you get technically better at dribbling at the age of 21? I’m not so sure, he’s going to spend an awful lot of time getting knocked on his arse in the PL.
I’m pretty sure I read on here that technique can’t be improved past age 16.Well as far as I'm aware you can improve at pretty much anything at age 21... Do you have any strong argument for the opposite?
Do you honestly believe this ?Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
I’m pretty sure I read on here that technique can’t be improved past age 16.
Why not? Did you think Salah was an exceptional dribbler at Chelsea?
It’s pretty clear to see, Salah is an naturally gifted footballer, mentality, immaturity and lack of physicality were his main issues at Chelsea, not his technical ability.
It’s pretty clear to see, Salah is an naturally gifted footballer, mentality, immaturity and lack of physicality were his main issues at Chelsea, not his technical ability.
Why not? Did you think Salah was an exceptional dribbler at Chelsea?
I’m pretty sure I read on here that technique can’t be improved past age 16.
I’m pretty sure I read on here that technique can’t be improved past age 16.
Technique can be improved while talent can't though? Scholes was basically a number 10 who was known for coming into the box late but he learned how to become a midfield maestro as his career went on. He wasn't dipping his shoulder and finding impossible passing lanes in his early twenties?That view was from a guy called Scholesy , and was widely ridiculed, although it’s pretty much true in my opinion. Ball control/technical ability is largely innate.
People have banged on about Chris Smalling not being technically good at football on here for years. This isn’t someone like me and you who only play football on a Thursday after work, this is someone who has played football, with top coaches and players, almost every day for about half of his life. Yet he struggles to pass the ball. You can pick the most professional and dedicated player you want. Are you saying that Lionel Messi is technically miles better than James Milner because James Milner is too lazy to work at being as good as Messi?
His dribbling against Chelsea when he was at Basel was exceptional.
Martial performed better than Rashford when he had played as a striker.
Rashford has been playing striker for the last 6 months and had shown that he hasn’t got what it takes to lead but Martial already has, only reason why he is not getting the chances is because he’s not English.
That view was from a guy called Scholesy , and was widely ridiculed, although it’s pretty much true in my opinion. Ball control/technical ability is largely innate.
People have banged on about Chris Smalling not being technically good at football on here for years. This isn’t someone like me and you who only play football on a Thursday after work, this is someone who has played football, with top coaches and players, almost every day for about half of his life. Yet he struggles to pass the ball. You can pick the most professional and dedicated player you want. Are you saying that Lionel Messi is technically miles better than James Milner because James Milner is too lazy to work at being as good as Messi?
Technique can be improved while talent can't though? Scholes was basically a number 10 who was known for coming into the box late but he learned how to become a midfield maestro as his career went on. He wasn't dipping his shoulder and finding impossible passing lanes in his early twenties?
Henry went from an inconsistent winger to a killer striker, Ronaldo basically transformed his entire game from his early twenties as well? He wasn't the genius he would become in knowing how to strike the ball cleanly in any given situation to score a goal?
I'm sure there's lesser examples that aren't as obvious as those.
Arsene Wenger says that technical ability needs to be developed by 12.
Those are tactical improvements not technical.
Improving shooting is technical improvement?
Not always a lot of it is starting to learn what positions to get in. But, it does seem like it is the technical ability that a player is most likely to improve. But, you really do not see players improve their first touch, close control in a significant way during their professional careers.
I meant long range shooting. It's technique isn't it. Also free kicks is also technical improvement.
If we cant improve a 20 year old footballitically, are we really a professional football club with coaches, fascilities, technology and stuff?
If we cant improve a 20 year old footballitically, are we really a professional football club with coaches, fascilities, technology and stuff?
We've got some very fast lads but they're taller leggy types like Chong, rashford, martial and greenwood and aren't as quick off the mark. James's flat pace is probably less than theirs but being shorter he accelerates explosively over a shorter distance in a similar way to Michael Owen. That explosiveness would add variety to our attack. IMO we don't have a player like him in the academy.But, the thing is we can just improve the kids we already have since I do not think he is any better than the young players already at the club.
We've got some very fast lads but they're taller leggy types like Chong, rashford, martial and greenwood and aren't as quick off the mark. James's flat pace is probably less than theirs but being shorter he accelerates explosively over a shorter distance in a similar way to Michael Owen. That explosiveness would add variety to our attack. IMO we don't have a player like him in the academy.
I know. It was a joke.That view was from a guy called Scholesy , and was widely ridiculed, although it’s pretty much true in my opinion. Ball control/technical ability is largely innate.
People have banged on about Chris Smalling not being technically good at football on here for years. This isn’t someone like me and you who only play football on a Thursday after work, this is someone who has played football, with top coaches and players, almost every day for about half of his life. Yet he struggles to pass the ball. You can pick the most professional and dedicated player you want. Are you saying that Lionel Messi is technically miles better than James Milner because James Milner is too lazy to work at being as good as Messi?
I knew he was 21 and was merely rounding it up.He's turning 22 in 5 months if you're talking about James. I find it odd that posters generally reduce player's ages when being positive about them and add to their ages when being dismissive
I’m pretty sure I read on here that technique can’t be improved past age 16.
Not always a lot of it is starting to learn what positions to get in. But, it does seem like it is the technical ability that a player is most likely to improve. But, you really do not see players improve their first touch, close control in a significant way during their professional careers.
Arsene Wenger says that technical ability needs to be developed by 12.
I knew he was 21 and was merely rounding it up.
Also a poster mentioned we already have kids his ilk. I agree in part, but how many of them have the experience of playing regularly and the confidence to run with the ball in a physical division?
I don't know part of me says go for it, and another part says "please, dont give me that hope"..
Well over to you Ole.