SteveW
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
- Messages
- 7,194
Not sure we do. Jones and Smalling can do enough. Can't remember us ever having a good ball playing cb in the past and we've been fine.
Surely there has to be a gif of the 'own goal'?
One of the funniest things I've seen in a game for ages. Wtf was he thinking?
Edit: Just found it. Its so so good
Lvg wants one in his system though..Rio was decent with the ball too in the past.Not sure we do. Jones and Smalling can do enough. Can't remember us ever having a good ball playing cb in the past and we've been fine.
I'm probably one of the few that is happy with Smalling, Jones and Blind as our 3 centrebacks. Smalling is is a cert, Jones for more physical opponents and Blind for when we need that extra bit of ability on the ball against pressing teams and teams that sit back.
The thing is you don't usually do a lot of rotation with CB's, a good back 4 is built on consistency.
Lvg wants one in his system though..Rio was decent with the ball too in the past.
Rio is my favourite CB ever. An elegant defender but in truth he was nothing special in possession. He hit a lot of aimless long passes.
People need to get over this ball playing CB rubbish. All any team needs at CB is two good defenders who can defend against quality attackers, organise the defense and keep clean sheets. If they are a threat from set pieces its a bonus. As for ability on the ball they should be good enough to consistently get the ball to a midfielder and not lose the ball in the wrong areas of the pitch. That's literally all that's required. Give me that much and I'm ecstatic.
They do not need to be expansive passers and they should not need to carry a creative burden or have any real effect on how the team plays. How many CBs in world football really have a major impact on how the team plays or how many chances a team creates? Do they really play in an area of the field where they can do that? There are 8 other outfield players who play further forward. If we are looking to our CBs to dictate play our team is simply not functioning correctly.
Smalling while not having much look in front of goal this season has had more of an attacking influence from set pieces alone than just about any CB in football has had through passing or being great on the ball.
Believe me, this and the left footed lcb things are things I am not a huge fan of either. I was just saying it as its one of Lvg's obsessions. So thats one thing he'd definitely consider.
Rio is my favourite CB ever. An elegant defender but in truth he was nothing special in possession. He hit a lot of aimless long passes.
People need to get over this ball playing CB rubbish. All any team needs at CB is two good defenders who can defend against quality attackers, organise the defense and keep clean sheets. If they are a threat from set pieces its a bonus. As for ability on the ball they should be good enough to consistently get the ball to a midfielder and not lose the ball in the wrong areas of the pitch. That's literally all that's required. Give me that much and I'm ecstatic.
They do not need to be expansive passers and they should not need to carry a creative burden or have any real effect on how the team plays. How many CBs in world football really have a major impact on how the team plays or how many chances a team creates? Do they really play in an area of the field where they can do that? There are 8 other outfield players who play further forward. If we are looking to our CBs to dictate play our team is simply not functioning correctly.
Smalling while not having much look in front of goal this season has had more of an attacking influence from set pieces alone than just about any CB in football has had through passing or being great on the ball.
if you're given the choice between two centre-backs with equal defensive ability, but one is very good on the ball, while the other is terrible, then you'll naturally opt for the one with better ability on the ball.
It's a bit like strikers. Yes, you want a striker to primarily score goals, but you'd ideally want one who's an accomplished player in general and isn't merely limited to being a finisher alone.
Why? Granted, a defender's main priority should be defending, but being a good footballer can often be an important part in that. I don't see what's wrong with wanting to have a centre-back who's comfortable on the ball, and is able to competently pass it to the midfield from the back. .
True. But occasionally switching from one centre-back to other, especially when they both have a decent pairing with Smalling, wouldn't be too disruptive. Of course, I'm still hoping that Jones eventually makes the position his own and becomes a consistent starter, but until then, I'm happy to see us changing it up here and there every so often, especially when we'll have a lot of football and certain players may occasionally need a rest.
Fair enough. Wasn't really aiming it at you. It's something I've been meaning to say for a while. I'm sick to death of hearing people trying to reinvent football to suit a narrative or justify decisions like playing Blind at CB.
That literally couldn't be more obvious. I was responding to a poster who suggested we NEEDED a ball playing CB
I said in my post that defenders should be able to pass the ball into midfield and comfortable enough on the ball to to give it away in the wrong areas. They need to be able to do the basics. They don't need to be great ball players.
They don't need to be, but it certainly helps. I do think clubs should be working to ensure that when young defenders are being developed, they're as good on the ball as possible. I got the impression that you seemed to be more against this, with your comments about it being an unnecessary reinvention etc.
You must be aiming at LvG then as people saying it are simply going off what the manager has stated he wants and how he feels it is important to have a CB that can bring the ball over the halfway line and be comfortable passing it under pressure. It's the Dutch way and it's how Barca play which is what LvG likes, so he is trying to mold us that way, it's why he didn't bother with Otamendi, he already had Jones and Rojo for the dog work CB style.
I'm aiming it at him and people who agree with him. I'm aiming it people who were happy to have a midfielder playing at CB because his passing was so important to the team and the way we play. It's a load of crap. CBs should be picked on their ability to keep clean sheets. Their defensive contribution is infinitely more important that how they contribute to our play.
Barca's defence has been their only weakness over the years. It's the one part of their team I wouldn't choose to emulate. They have got away with it by being bloody brilliant in just about every other area. If we had their team we could "innovate" as much as we want at the back.
The other reason people liked Blind in there was his brain, where as Jones is as thick as week old porridge and prone to regular lapses positionally.
Is Blind really that much more astute than Jones when it comes to reading the game? I think his gracefulness, and Jones' very obvious lack of it gives that impression far more than is actually the case.
One of the best passers we've had at this club. Range is brilliant. How many times has he played a gem of a pass from the CB position this season?
Out of position, and easily out-muscled and out-paced in that phase of play. A bit disappointing that he completely gave up the chase, too!
He plays like a midfielder in defence, because that's what he is. Great passing, but little presence. To be fair, he offered just about enough today, given that Smalling was in beast mode.
Overall, a decent performance, but only because he was hardly called upon to do any defending. I'm just glad that Doumbia didn't play from the beginning. Blind was targeted by him in the away tie and I was afraid the same might happen today.
Don't let that get in their way though.That didn't happen. Blind didn't start in Moscow. He came on for Rojo by 65th minute or so and by then we were dominating the game and we were hardly required to defend.