This pleases me
COULD THE EURO MAKE YOUR PETS IMPOTENT?
Is this a simulated headline generator or are they just taken from the archives?
Missing Clapping SmileyLineker getting Walkers to boycott the Sun too.
Edit to say I just saw your thread
WRITER ON BENEFITS WASTES YOUR TAXES ON SCANTILY-CLAD STUDENTSNope, these are all made up by SteveJ.
Go on Steve, give us your best headlines!
The Diana one - it's nearly 20 years since that poor woman died. They should just leave it now. It'll run out of steam on its own eventually, as there'll be more people alive who don't even remember her than there will be middle-aged conspiracy-theorist ghouls.COULD CHAVS DEVALUE THE MIDDLE CLASS?
HAS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MADE HARD-WORKING FAMILIES IMPOTENT?
HAVE FERAL CHILDREN DEFRAUDED THE QUEEN?
IS BINGE DRINKING GIVING MIDDLE BRITAIN DIABETES? (Actually, that one could be legit)
DIANA, DIANA, DIANA, DIANA, DIANA
*waves*conspiracy-theorist ghouls.
The Diana one - it's nearly 20 years since that poor woman died. They should just leave it now. It'll run out of steam on its own eventually, as there'll be more people alive who don't even remember her than there will be middle-aged conspiracy-theorist ghouls.
WRITER ON BENEFITS WASTES YOUR TAXES ON SCANTILY-CLAD STUDENTS
Colly said:I actually made the Diana one up myself (so SteveJ couldn't)
Not really, chief. The EU did make me impotent though.Colly said:You actually do this though, don't you?
@Nick 0208 Ldn
Stuff like this is why you cannot have a mass-appeal left. It will never break through the media barriers.
Yes, apart from you. You'll never be a ghoul.*waves*
Well, when you have two pieces of information, one that he had a remain leaflet in his possession, the other that he shouted things long the line of "keep Britain first" when he murdered her, there's only one real intent I can see that would lead you to include the former in your headline rather than the latter (indeed, they kept that piece of info out of even the subheadings).I don't get it. Isn't this thread about DM being twats? That heading/sub-heads all seem reasonable enough. Or am I missing something?
Well, when you have two pieces of information, one that he had a remain leaflet in his possession, the other that he shouted things long the line of "keep Britain first" when he murdered her, there's only one real intent I can see that would lead you to include the former in your headline rather than the latter (indeed, they kept that piece of info out of even the subheadings).
I feel like I'm going mad here! I really can't see the problem with this? I haven't read the article. What are they leaving out that's important?
They're deliberately attempting to associate him with anti-Brexit to, at least, suggest he was mental and erratic and not politically motivated.I feel like I'm going mad here! I really can't see the problem with this? I haven't read the article. What are they leaving out that's important?
They're deliberately attempting to associate him with anti-Brexit to, at least, suggest he was mental and erratic and not politically motivated.
To quote reddit. Can someone please Explain Like I'm Five?
By inferring he was taking two contrary stances (anti and pro Brexit) without ever actually stating it, they undermine his self confessed "political activism" position by subtly suggesting he was inconsistent and mental. At least that's how I read it.To quote reddit. Can someone please Explain Like I'm Five?
They are trying to portray him as being anti-Brexit, presumably due to their own stance.