Daily Mail

The black art of propaganda. I wonder what their record was in the 30s. Did Geobbels learn from the Daily Heil or vice versa ?
 
Well they did support the Nazi's for a while in the 30s, so they probably learned from each other
 
COULD THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT INFECT BRITAIN'S FARMERS WITH AIDS?

COULD THE EURO MAKE YOUR PETS IMPOTENT?

WILL FACEBOOK MAKE BRITAIN'S SWANS OBESE?

ARE TEACHERS GIVING HOUSE PRICES DIABETES?
 
WILL CHAVS GIVE THE MIDDLE CLASS CANCER?

HAS THE E.U. STOLEN THE IDENTITY OF THE ROYAL FAMILY?

IS FEMINISM INFECTING DRIVERS WITH AIDS?
 
IS THE BBC MOLESTING THE BRITISH PEOPLE?

ARE MUSLIMS GIVING YOUR PETS CANCER?

ARE PAEDOPHILES DESTROYING BRITAIN'S SWANS?

All sound like legit headlines.
 
COULD CHAVS DEVALUE THE MIDDLE CLASS?

HAS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MADE HARD-WORKING FAMILIES IMPOTENT?

HAVE FERAL CHILDREN DEFRAUDED THE QUEEN?

IS BINGE DRINKING GIVING MIDDLE BRITAIN DIABETES? (Actually, that one could be legit)

DIANA, DIANA, DIANA, DIANA, DIANA
 
COULD THE GERMANS INFECT THE COUNTRYSIDE WITH AIDS?
COULD IMMIGRANTS IMPREGNATE HOMEOWNERS?
COULD MUSLIMS HAVE SEX WITH THE CHURCH?
COULD THE POLES GIVE YOUR DAUGHTERS SWINE FLU?

They all seem quite similar to headlines posted by Jippy in my opinion. :lol:
 
COULD CHAVS DEVALUE THE MIDDLE CLASS?

HAS POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MADE HARD-WORKING FAMILIES IMPOTENT?

HAVE FERAL CHILDREN DEFRAUDED THE QUEEN?

IS BINGE DRINKING GIVING MIDDLE BRITAIN DIABETES? (Actually, that one could be legit)

DIANA, DIANA, DIANA, DIANA, DIANA
The Diana one - it's nearly 20 years since that poor woman died. They should just leave it now. It'll run out of steam on its own eventually, as there'll be more people alive who don't even remember her than there will be middle-aged conspiracy-theorist ghouls.
 
The Diana one - it's nearly 20 years since that poor woman died. They should just leave it now. It'll run out of steam on its own eventually, as there'll be more people alive who don't even remember her than there will be middle-aged conspiracy-theorist ghouls.

I actually made the Diana one up myself (so SteveJ couldn't) :smirk:
 
Colly said:
I actually made the Diana one up myself (so SteveJ couldn't)
:lol:
Colly said:
You actually do this though, don't you?
Not really, chief. The EU did make me impotent though.
 
CxZSHNrWQAEL3DH.jpg
 
I don't get it. Isn't this thread about DM being twats? That heading/sub-heads all seem reasonable enough. Or am I missing something?
Well, when you have two pieces of information, one that he had a remain leaflet in his possession, the other that he shouted things long the line of "keep Britain first" when he murdered her, there's only one real intent I can see that would lead you to include the former in your headline rather than the latter (indeed, they kept that piece of info out of even the subheadings).
 
Well, when you have two pieces of information, one that he had a remain leaflet in his possession, the other that he shouted things long the line of "keep Britain first" when he murdered her, there's only one real intent I can see that would lead you to include the former in your headline rather than the latter (indeed, they kept that piece of info out of even the subheadings).

I feel like I'm going mad here! I really can't see the problem with this? I haven't read the article. What are they leaving out that's important?
 
I feel like I'm going mad here! I really can't see the problem with this? I haven't read the article. What are they leaving out that's important?
They're deliberately attempting to associate him with anti-Brexit to, at least, suggest he was mental and erratic and not politically motivated.
 
To quote reddit. Can someone please Explain Like I'm Five?
By inferring he was taking two contrary stances (anti and pro Brexit) without ever actually stating it, they undermine his self confessed "political activism" position by subtly suggesting he was inconsistent and mental. At least that's how I read it.