Daily Mail

I'm fairly sure there's a test, but even at that, would you really trust it? There'd always be that doubt wouldn't there.
 
The wording of these two articles is almost identical:

Guardian said:
England have benefited from the fact that their failure to qualify for Euro 2008 no longer counts against them when the rankings are calculated.
Click to expand...
DailyMail said:
England have benefited from the fact that their failure to qualify for Euro 2008 no longer counts against them when the rankings are calculated.
Click to expand...

DailyMail said:
England rose two places after their Euro 2012 campaign with only Spain, Germany and Uruguay ahead of them - and are expected to achieve a highest-ever ranking of third next month.
Click to expand...
Guardian said:
England rose two places after their Euro 2012 campaign with only Spain, Germany and Uruguay ahead of them – and are expected to achieve a highest-ever ranking of third next month.
Click to expand...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jul/06/fifa-defend-rankings-system?newsfeed=true
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...nkings-hard-understand.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
Sir Matt said:
:lol: Articles from the Press Association are the same shocker.
Click to expand...

Damn. I only read "By SPORTSMAIL REPORTER" from the Daily Mail side, forgot to look at the Guardian's version.

To be honest I didn't know "By SPORTSMAIL REPORTER" was the associated press.
 
I always assume that Sportsmail Reporter is the AP. It may just be a modified version of the AP story.
 
Sir Matt said:
I always assume that Sportsmail Reporter is the AP. It may just be a modified version of the AP story.
Click to expand...

A mate works there. If the sub hates your copy cos he or she has to hack it around for it to make sense you can lose your byline and be Daily Mail reporter of staff reporter apparently. Although am sure they rape AP stuff that way too.
 
rcoobc said:
So, I was right or not :hmm:
Click to expand...

Well unless Simon Bird had copied and pasted from AP, but then if he had, he'd be unlikely to take credit and then draw attention to it. Those Guardian/Mail examples may be AP, but without even looking I can guess that the Mail's was probably published later.

SPORTSMAIL REPORTER is just the Mail's proxy for "anything we didn't write"
 
I contacted the DM website yesterday to complain about the punctuation in Sportsmail Reporter's article. Every iteration of 'its' contained an apostrophe.

It made me feel better.
 
This made me do a double-take.

article-0-141E46BE000005DC-626_306x423.jpg
 
Still don't understand why people give a shit about a singers armpit hair.
 
JakeC said:
Still don't understand why people give a shit about a singers armpit hair.
Click to expand...

It's part of the objectifying of people by the gutter press and it doesn't just happen to women, they are always commenting on mens' physiques or looks too. It's as if that woman is somehow diminished in some way for showing that particular part of her body - she could accidentally show her breasts and that would get quite a different reaction.
 
I haven't read this thread because I'm too busy getting my post-baby bikini body back.
 
Not sure that piece would even pass quality control at the Daily Sport.
 
What did they want? Its the Olympics ffs. Do they want an opening ceremony that matches their colonial white supremacist view of the world?

Not to mention they'd be off their tits if the Guardian used the genuine historical abuses committed by the British to state why we shouldn't be 'proud' of our past, but they use one example of poor service to paint the NHS as a pile of shit..
 
Drainy said:
What did they want? Its the Olympics ffs. Do they want an opening ceremony that matches their colonial white supremacist view of the world?

Not to mention they'd be off their tits if the Guardian used the genuine historical abuses committed by the British to state why we shouldn't be 'proud' of our past, but they use one example of poor service to paint the NHS as a pile of shit..
Click to expand...

Absolutely. A complete smear job and naked propaganda. The content of the article not only risibly shameless but breathtakingly disingenuous.
 
But it was the absurdly unrealistic scene – and indeed one that would spring from the kind of nonsensical targets and equality quotas we see in the NHS - showing a mixed-race middle-class family in a detached new-build suburban home, which was most symptomatic of the politically correct agenda in modern Britain.

This was supposed to be a representation of modern life in England but it is likely to be a challenge for the organisers to find an educated white middle-aged mother and black father living together with a happy family in such a set-up.

Almost, if not every shot, in the next sequence included an ethnic minority performer. The BBC presenter Hazel Irvine gushed about the importance of grime music (a form of awful electronic music popular among black youths) to east London.

This multicultural equality agenda was so staged it was painful to watch.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...HS-disgracefully-glorified.html#ixzz21vaxMJy5
Click to expand...

:eek: Been a while since I read the Mail.

Surely when you're using the word 'equality' to smear your opponents, you must start to suspect you've joined the Dark Side?

 
This was supposed to be a representation of modern life in England but it is likely to be a challenge for the organisers to find an educated white middle-aged mother and black father living together with a happy family in such a set-up.
Click to expand...

Yes because, obviously, all black people are crack-addicted criminals, while non-middle class white women ('trailing countless scruffy children supported by YOUR taxes!') with black partners are all thick whores. :rolleyes:

F*cking disgusted with the Daily Mail. Anyway...strip away the veneer of 'better' modern-day standards of living for those of us who aren't middle-or-upper class and the Ceremony's brief footage from Oliver Twist remains apposite.
 
SteveJ said:
Yes because, obviously, all black people are crack-addicted criminals, while non-middle class white women ('trailing countless scruffy children supported by YOUR taxes!') with black partners are all thick whores. :rolleyes:

F*cking disgusted with the Daily Mail. Anyway...strip away the veneer of 'better' modern-day standards of living for those of us who aren't middle-or-upper class and the Ceremony's brief footage from Oliver Twist remains apposite.
Click to expand...
I think it was supposed to be more of a smear on white women who, in their eyes, degrade themselves when they get them some black cock.

For the record though, it's not particularly hard to find middle class mixed race couples. Not that it matter here, the daily mail is obviously just pandering to it's close minded extreme right wing readers, and the hordes of the left wing (i.e us) who are ready to be disgusting by these articles giving them more hits on their website.

Seriously people, stop fecking linking us to daily mail articles. Just fecking copy and paste and the whole thing. I for one refuse to click on those links or go on their website and you should too. Every time you visit their website you give them more advertising revenue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.