Criticism is fine (and encouraged) but there are some criticisms thrown at Ole that don't make any sense

I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.
 
I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.

And if we dont win anything, should those with opposite views be banned?
 
I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.

Looks like everyone will be safe then. Because us and silverware ain't happening. Not while he's here anyway.
 
I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.

Funny as I think it's exactly the other way round. No matter how much he fecks up he'll always be blindly defended by some
 
No I haven't. You are living in cocoo land again

Why are you posting that you don’t see people criticising Ole when he fecks up if you don’t think he’s consistently fecking up?
What do you want them to do? Post about Ole fecking up no matter how much he fecks up… even though you don’t think he’s consistently fecking up?
 
Why are you posting that you don’t see people criticising Ole when he fecks up if you don’t think he’s consistently fecking up?
What do you want them to do? Post about Ole fecking up no matter how much he fecks up… even though you don’t think he’s consistently fecking up?

I have no idea what you are on about mate.
 
Funny as I think it's exactly the other way round. No matter how much he fecks up he'll always be blindly defended by some

Yeah it's the match going TOP REDS who are blindly defending him to the hilt, I had a ST back in 10/11 but couldn't afford to keep it going but if I had kept it then I would still not just accept this inability to keep the ball in the majority of games and ignore his faults that are clear as day
 
I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.
You think people hate Ole, and also for no reason?
 
When has Ole consistently fecked up?
Last nearly 3 years? Do you really want to list the feck ups (no not every time we didnt win)?

He has done well and f'd up consistently, which started with his fantastic start as interim to bottling top 4 eventually anyway.
 
I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.

The perfect example of why the OP is wrong right here.

A consistent concern loses us a game and when people read criticism on it the toys go out the pram.

The simple fact is the some aren't able to comprehend that most of the posters criticising Ole and sharing their concerns still want him to stay and be a success.

Since they're unwilling to debate flaws any opposing opinion becomes illogical and they either create threads to only speak to those they already agree with or worse threads slagging off those they don't.

The rest of us just want to debate the good and the bad without this nonsense.
 
I know, Ole will always get bashed no matter what happens, let their small minds explode with negatively, I think even if we had won a trophy by now itd still be oh why haven't we won this or this. He'll never have the backing of some so let them spew their garbage every time we lose.
Let's hope all these when we get silverware get banned.

No, it is precisely because when Utd have been within striking distance of silverware that Ole has choked, and to be quite frank, blown it. He does not have the tactical nous or mental toughness to motivate this team at crucial moments. I think he will be gone by the end of this season, if not sooner.
 
No, it is precisely because when Utd have been within striking distance of silverware that Ole has choked, and to be quite frank, blown it. He does not have the tactical nous or mental toughness to motivate this team at crucial moments. I think he will be gone by the end of this season, if not sooner.


You are going to be massively disappointed this season when he not gone.


Be absolutely bonkers sacking him, considering the planning and money they've put into getting us back to a consistent level, improvement year on year and the squad we have built up for now and the future.
 
When has Ole consistently fecked up?

In the cups. The league is where he has shown consistency really.

To have not win a cup by now is poor especially when he had the benefit of being in the EL twice by getting knocked out of the CL in a ridiculous fashion.
 
The lack of tactical identity is the most concerning for me. We still play like a side sent out with nothing more but a hope their big players put in a performance rather than a team that are sent out to play in a certain way.

He doesn’t have an identity as manager tactically. He says things like “The United way” and makes us feel warm and remembers the past but…that’s it
 
The perfect example of why the OP is wrong right here.

A consistent concern loses us a game and when people read criticism on it the toys go out the pram.

The simple fact is the some aren't able to comprehend that most of the posters criticising Ole and sharing their concerns still want him to stay and be a success.

Since they're unwilling to debate flaws any opposing opinion becomes illogical and they either create threads to only speak to those they already agree with or worse threads slagging off those they don't.

The rest of us just want to debate the good and the bad without this nonsense.

I very much agree with the bolded sentence. But it also makes that very difficult when lots of posters just conflate what's gone wrong in a given game with what they think is wrong with OGS, or the team. There's no balance to it. You get something in one game and people point to that and the fact it's been a problem in 5 or 6 other games and think this proves that's how this team is, and just ignore that it hasn't been like that in 50 other games.

But in any case, that's a futile debate. I wish we could just re-start. Accept we've just stepped out of one phase - rebuild - and are now in another, where things have to come together, and where we can recalibrate expectations too. During the course of this season, very good things need to happen - this is when all that investment and all that painstaking rebuilding of the squad and club culture should start yielding tangible results.

Early returns seem to be some things are in place, some aren't. Maybe we still need a little patience, there are many new pieces in and a lot of impact to sort out. Maybe we need to remember that the results of getting Ronaldo maybe cannot be reasonably expected to match how good it feels to have gotten Ronaldo. But, we are no longer talking about a patience of seasons, but of weeks, or at most months. This does need to come together in a clearer way than it has so far. I think OGS has that view too. Last year, this felt like a team that was becoming great, staking a claim to be back among the PL elite. This year, it needs to provide a sense that it is back, undisputably.

It is both fairer and more relevant to judge OGS on his results now than it was 6 or 18 months ago. I just wish people would do so without drawing stuff they saw occasionally during the past two seasons into it. How he does with this squad is what he should be judged on.
 
I very much agree with the bolded sentence. But it also makes that very difficult when lots of posters just conflate what's gone wrong in a given game with what they think is wrong with OGS, or the team. There's no balance to it. You get something in one game and people point to that and the fact it's been a problem in 5 or 6 other games and think this proves that's how this team is, and just ignore that it hasn't been like that in 50 other games.

But in any case, that's a futile debate. I wish we could just re-start. Accept we've just stepped out of one phase - rebuild - and are now in another, where things have to come together, and where we can recalibrate expectations too. During the course of this season, very good things need to happen - this is when all that investment and all that painstaking rebuilding of the squad and club culture should start yielding tangible results.

Early returns seem to be some things are in place, some aren't. Maybe we still need a little patience, there are many new pieces in and a lot of impact to sort out. Maybe we need to remember that the results of getting Ronaldo maybe cannot be reasonably expected to match how good it feels to have gotten Ronaldo. But, we are no longer talking about a patience of seasons, but of weeks, or at most months. This does need to come together in a clearer way than it has so far. I think OGS has that view too. Last year, this felt like a team that was becoming great, staking a claim to be back among the PL elite. This year, it needs to provide a sense that it is back, undisputably.

It is both fairer and more relevant to judge OGS on his results now than it was 6 or 18 months ago. I just wish people would do so without drawing stuff they saw occasionally during the past two seasons into it. How he does with this squad is what he should be judged on.

The bit in bold is interesting - what do you expect people to do though if the concerns they have are still very much prevalent with this squad of players too? Surely then history is a valid indicator?
 
The bit in bold is interesting - what do you expect people to do though if the concerns they have are still very much prevalent with this squad of players too? Surely then history is a valid indicator?

Mostly no I think, because the key point is that there are phases in play here. On the whole, I think the results and performances delivered in 2019/20 and 2020/21 were up to or beyond expectations, given where we were in the process at those times. As the squad has improved, so has the results. But it takes time to build a winner, and it usually involves stumbles at key moments. The ones we've had haven't generally been different or worse than we should expect. And there's been a good deal that has been impressive, and better than we could expect.

It generally makes little sense to me to insist on seeing OGS' period as a single whole - what we can expect now is too different from what we could expect in, say, the fall of 2019 and the reasons why things work or don't work are also different. If we have a certain problem in one game now that we also had in 5 games in 2019 and 3 games in 2020, that doesn't necessarily show that the problem is OGS and not the squad. The reasons may be very different in different cases, or a different mix of factors. So I'd be careful with that. But I wouldn't want to go to the opposite extreme either, in some cases there are clearly elements of continuity that is to do with OGS' approach. But it just so easily tips over into excessive generalisation that fails to take account of the fact it's been a real journey, with different parts of that journey looking very different, and for very good reasons. I mean, just look at how our best XI looked at times during that period, compared to what we have now. It's like different worlds.
 
Ole reminds me of Southgate,both learning on the job
No subs in the europa league final and wrong subs on Thursday
The Manager that utilities the squad best will win the league this season
He needs to trust his squad more not just rely on Bruno and Ronaldo
 
With Ole is boils down to just not being good enough for a club like United. I like to counter argument threads like this with a simple question.

If Ole didn't have an affiliation with the club and delivered the results/performances he has to date, would the fan base accept it?


I believe the answer to the above is a resounding 'no'. On the basis the LVG and Jose were more successful but we still didn't think they were right. Ole also now has a far better squad than both of them.

I'm not saying Ole isn't a good manager, but Manchester United is a club that should have an elite manager, not settle for 'good'. We look round every position in our squad and want to improve the weaknesses, whether that be CDM, RW or CB.

Our biggest weakness at present is the management. If you give Pep, Klopp or Tuchel our squad I honestly think we are favourites for the league.

Ole once said he only wants the best for the club. The fact is, 'he' isn't the best for the club, only the best to serve as the Glazers shield.
 
Ole reminds me of Southgate,both learning on the job
No subs in the europa league final and wrong subs on Thursday
The Manager that utilities the squad best will win the league this season
He needs to trust his squad more not just rely on Bruno and Ronaldo
Being a learning manager is palatable if you learn from your mistakes. This season he has no excuses so although there were really over the top reactions to Young Boys, it's not exactly surprising. He's in his 4th year and shooting himself in the foot in his first European game. That too after failing to control 2 out of his 4 league games against midtable sides.
 
With Ole is boils down to just not being good enough for a club like United. I like to counter argument threads like this with a simple question.

If Ole didn't have an affiliation with the club and delivered the results/performances he has to date, would the fan base accept it?

I believe the answer to the above is a resounding 'no'. On the basis the LVG and Jose were more successful but we still didn't think they were right. Ole also now has a far better squad than both of them.

I'm not saying Ole isn't a good manager, but Manchester United is a club that should have an elite manager, not settle for 'good'. We look round every position in our squad and want to improve the weaknesses, whether that be CDM, RW or CB.

Our biggest weakness at present is the management. If you give Pep, Klopp or Tuchel our squad I honestly think we are favourites for the league.

Ole once said he only wants the best for the club. The fact is, 'he' isn't the best for the club, only the best to serve as the Glazers shield.
In some sense he has been more succesful than Mourinho and LvG one could argue, when it comes to trophies, he is not.
 
In some sense he has been more succesful than Mourinho and LvG one could argue, when it comes to trophies, he is not.

I hate to sound like Jose but in football, for a club like United, trophies are the ONLY meaningful success.

It's all well and good building a great squad, culture and atmosphere but that is all to serve the attainment of silverware. Something I just don't think Ole will ever do.

Actually pray to be proven wrong as I know the club have no intention of changing unless things get terrible and we can't even make top 4.
 
I hate to sound like Jose but in football, for a club like United, trophies are the ONLY meaningful success.

It's all well and good building a great squad, culture and atmosphere but that is all to serve the attainment of silverware. Something I just don't think Ole will ever do.

Actually pray to be proven wrong as I know the club have no intention of changing unless things get terrible and we can't even make top 4.
It's a fair point whilst Im not sure if I agree. He has generally had better league campaigns and he has improved yearly albeit very marginally. But I think the points of both camps are fair enough.
 
Are you trying to say we don't have fans that hate Ole? You only need to do a search on this forum to see we do.
Think hate is a strong word, and if they would it is very much based on his career here as a manager. I doubt it is because they just despise the man and want to see him fail.

I don't think he's a great coach at all but I'd love it if he was and if he succeeds here at United. He seems a very decent and likeable man.
 
With Ole is boils down to just not being good enough for a club like United. I like to counter argument threads like this with a simple question.

If Ole didn't have an affiliation with the club and delivered the results/performances he has to date, would the fan base accept it?

I believe the answer to the above is a resounding 'no'. On the basis the LVG and Jose were more successful but we still didn't think they were right. Ole also now has a far better squad than both of them.

I'm not saying Ole isn't a good manager, but Manchester United is a club that should have an elite manager, not settle for 'good'. We look round every position in our squad and want to improve the weaknesses, whether that be CDM, RW or CB.

Our biggest weakness at present is the management. If you give Pep, Klopp or Tuchel our squad I honestly think we are favourites for the league.

Ole once said he only wants the best for the club. The fact is, 'he' isn't the best for the club, only the best to serve as the Glazers shield.

The answer should be a resounding "yes". You take far too much for granted, including your ability to determine how good a manager Ole is.
 
I hate to sound like Jose but in football, for a club like United, trophies are the ONLY meaningful success.

It's all well and good building a great squad, culture and atmosphere but that is all to serve the attainment of silverware. Something I just don't think Ole will ever do.

Actually pray to be proven wrong as I know the club have no intention of changing unless things get terrible and we can't even make top 4.

You build a great squad, culture and atmosphere exactly BECAUSE trophies are the only meaningful success, and because you need these things in order to win them. Did you imagine the club, Ole or anyone here thought those things were the aim in themselves?
 
Being a learning manager is palatable if you learn from your mistakes. This season he has no excuses so although there were really over the top reactions to Young Boys, it's not exactly surprising. He's in his 4th year and shooting himself in the foot in his first European game. That too after failing to control 2 out of his 4 league games against midtable sides.

Agreed. It's actually an impressive achievement to come up with an over the top reaction to the YBB game, given how much you could very reasonably cram in under the top, but some people still managed it. :)

There really, really can't be many more nights like that.
 
In total he is a worse manager than Guardiola, Klopp, Tuchel etc but better than many others. Point.
 
Oles biggest genius is getting people to be so angry at him that they are genuinely not blaming Jesse Lingard for making a perfect pointless pass to give Young Boys the 2-1 goal. Mesmerizing.
 
Make or break season for Ole. Time to deliver or move on.
Yup he needs to leapfrog the two best managers on planet Earth and two of the richest clubs on earth, in the most competitive league in the world, otherwise we need to hire Conte or Zidane.

Am I doing this right?
 
Yup he needs to leapfrog the two best managers on planet Earth and two of the richest clubs on earth, in the most competitive league in the world, otherwise we need to hire Conte or Zidane.

Am I doing this right?

What would it actually take for you to realize he isn't a good manager? Just because he isn't a complete disaster doesn't mean we should keep him if there are upgraded available. Or do you actually think it's okay that we just continue along with what you admit is a worse manager than our rivals?
 
Whatever happens the man will always be a legend at this club.

However, he, the team and the fans need a trophy win or he’ll be saddled with a ‘loser’ or ‘choker’ tag. There’s no doubt he’s improved the team but he needs to get us over the line. A huge chance was wasted against Villarreal in the EL final but that’s now history. He’s got us mighty close but now is the time to deliver. We have a good enough squad to win something. I pray he can
 
Yup he needs to leapfrog the two best managers on planet Earth and two of the richest clubs on earth, in the most competitive league in the world, otherwise we need to hire Conte or Zidane.

Am I doing this right?
No, it's better to make top 4 every year and just concede that you will never challenge because the other clubs have the two best managers on earth(aren't you defeating your own point here?) and are two of the richest clubs on earth. We need to stick with Ole for life.

Am I doing this right?